Fact Check: "US strikes may not fully eliminate Iran's nuclear program, experts warn."
What We Know
Following recent U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, experts have expressed skepticism regarding the complete destruction of Iran's nuclear capabilities. The strikes targeted three key sites: Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan, employing advanced munitions like the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, which is designed to penetrate deep underground facilities (source-1). While U.S. officials claimed significant damage was inflicted, independent assessments from experts such as Jeffrey Lewis and David Albright indicate that critical components of Iran's nuclear program remain intact. They noted that important facilities and stockpiles of highly enriched uranium were likely untouched, suggesting that Iran's nuclear ambitions are far from obliterated (source-2).
Analysis
The claim that U.S. strikes may not fully eliminate Iran's nuclear program is supported by multiple credible sources. Experts have highlighted that while the strikes may have disrupted some operations, they did not comprehensively dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure. For instance, Lewis pointed out that "some really important things that haven't been hit" remain operational, and Albright confirmed the existence of significant amounts of enriched uranium that were likely not targeted during the strikes (source-2).
Moreover, the broader implications of the strikes could paradoxically motivate Iran to accelerate its nuclear ambitions. Rosemary Kelanic, a defense policy expert, warned that the U.S. actions might lead Iran to pursue nuclear weapons more aggressively, as they could perceive nuclear capability as essential for national security (source-1). This perspective is echoed by various intelligence assessments, which suggest that the strikes may have hardened Iran's resolve rather than diminished it (source-1).
The reliability of the sources used in this analysis is high. The New York Times and NPR are reputable news organizations known for their rigorous journalistic standards. The experts cited are recognized authorities in the field of nuclear non-proliferation and international security, lending further credibility to their assessments.
Conclusion
The claim that U.S. strikes may not fully eliminate Iran's nuclear program is True. Evidence from multiple expert analyses indicates that while the strikes may have caused damage, they did not comprehensively dismantle Iran's nuclear capabilities. Furthermore, the geopolitical implications of these strikes could potentially encourage Iran to pursue nuclear weapons more fervently, contradicting the intended deterrent effect of the military action.
Sources
- After U.S. Strikes, Iran May Be Determined to Build a Nuclear Weapon
- Satellites show damage to Iran's nuclear program, but experts say it's not destroyed
- 4 takeaways on the U.S. airstrikes on Iran
- World awaits Iranian response after US hits nuclear sites
- The Latest: US claims strikes on Iran's nuclear sites caused ...
- Analysis: Iran's race toward a nuclear bomb may be gathering pace
- 4 ways Tehran could retaliate after U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear ...
