Fact Check: "US military operation did not destroy key underground nuclear facilities."
What We Know
A recent military operation by the United States targeted three key Iranian nuclear facilities: the Fordow Uranium Enrichment Plant, the Natanz Nuclear Facility, and the Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center. According to a preliminary classified report from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, the bombing effectively sealed off the entrances to two of these facilities but did not collapse their underground structures (New York Times). The initial assessment indicated that the strikes set back Iran's nuclear program by only a few months, rather than obliterating it as claimed by some officials, including former President Trump (Reuters).
Further evaluations revealed that much of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile had been relocated prior to the strikes, limiting the damage to the nuclear material itself (New York Times). Additionally, independent assessments from various sources, including satellite imagery, confirmed that while there was significant damage, the core components of Iran's nuclear program remained intact (NPR).
Analysis
The claim that the U.S. military operation did not destroy key underground nuclear facilities is supported by multiple credible sources. The initial U.S. intelligence assessment, as reported by the New York Times, indicates that the bombing did not result in the total destruction of the facilities, contradicting more aggressive claims made by some government officials. The assessment also noted that the damage was less severe than anticipated, with the potential for Iran to quickly recover its nuclear capabilities.
Moreover, independent reports from Reuters and CNN corroborate these findings, emphasizing that the strikes did not eliminate the core components of Iran's nuclear infrastructure. The reliability of these sources is bolstered by their established reputations in reporting on military and intelligence matters.
However, it is important to note that while the strikes did not achieve their intended goal of complete destruction, they did inflict significant damage, as highlighted by the U.S. military's own assessments (Wikipedia). The mixed messages from various officials, including the administration's pushback against the initial assessments, suggest a complex narrative surrounding the effectiveness of the military operation.
Conclusion
Verdict: True
The claim that the U.S. military operation did not destroy key underground nuclear facilities is accurate based on the evidence presented. The preliminary assessments indicate that while the operation caused damage and delayed Iran's nuclear program, it did not result in the complete destruction of the facilities as claimed by some officials. The findings from multiple credible sources support this conclusion, highlighting the complexities and limitations of military interventions in nuclear infrastructure.
Sources
- Strike Set Back Iran's Nuclear Program by Only a Few Months, U.S ...
- United States strikes on Iranian nuclear sites - Wikipedia
- US strikes may have set back Iran nuclear program only ...
- Early US assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not ...
- Satellites show damage to Iran's nuclear program, but ...
- Exclusive: Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did ... - CNN
- U.S.、USA、America 有什么区别? - 知乎
- US bombs Iran's nuclear sites: What we know so far