Fact Check: U.S. military has no authority to drone strike Mexican drug cartels

Fact Check: U.S. military has no authority to drone strike Mexican drug cartels

Published April 9, 2025
VERDICT
True

# U.S. Military Has No Authority to Drone Strike Mexican Drug Cartels ## Introduction The claim that the U.S. military lacks the authority to conduct...

U.S. Military Has No Authority to Drone Strike Mexican Drug Cartels

Introduction

The claim that the U.S. military lacks the authority to conduct drone strikes against Mexican drug cartels has recently gained attention, particularly in light of statements from Pentagon officials. This assertion comes amidst discussions regarding the designation of these cartels as foreign terrorist organizations by former President Donald Trump. The implications of this designation and the legal authority surrounding military actions in foreign nations, particularly Mexico, are complex and multifaceted.

What We Know

  1. Pentagon Statements: A senior Pentagon official, Colby Jenkins, confirmed during a Senate committee hearing that U.S. special operations forces do not currently have the authority to execute drone strikes against drug cartels in Mexico, despite their designation as foreign terrorist organizations by the Trump administration 1610.

  2. Legal Framework: The legal authority for military action is governed by U.S. law and international law, which generally prohibits military operations in another sovereign nation without explicit permission from that nation or a UN mandate. Mexico has publicly rejected any unilateral military action by the U.S. 29.

  3. Designation of Cartels: The Trump administration's designation of certain Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations was intended to provide U.S. intelligence and military agencies with broader operational capabilities. However, this designation does not automatically confer the authority to conduct military strikes 45.

  4. Current Review by CIA: The CIA is reportedly reviewing its own authorities regarding the use of lethal force against drug cartels, indicating that there may be ongoing discussions about the extent of military engagement in this context 8.

  5. Mexico's Position: The Mexican government has expressed strong opposition to any potential U.S. military action, emphasizing the importance of sovereignty and diplomatic relations 29.

Analysis

The claim that the U.S. military has no authority to drone strike Mexican drug cartels is supported by official statements from Pentagon officials, which lend credibility to the assertion. The source of this information, AP News, is generally regarded as a reliable news organization, known for its fact-based reporting and adherence to journalistic standards 1. However, it is essential to consider the context in which these statements were made, including the political climate and ongoing discussions about U.S.-Mexico relations.

The Reuters articles also corroborate the Pentagon's position, providing additional context regarding Mexico's rejection of unilateral military action and the implications of the cartels' designation as terrorist organizations 23. However, it is important to note that the sources reporting on this issue may have varying degrees of bias, particularly given the politically charged nature of U.S. military actions abroad.

The potential for conflict of interest arises from the involvement of political figures and the implications of military actions on international relations. For instance, the Trump administration's approach to drug cartels was part of a broader strategy that included significant political rhetoric, which may influence how these claims are presented in the media 45.

Moreover, the ongoing review by the CIA suggests that there may be internal debates about the legal frameworks governing military actions against drug cartels, which could lead to changes in policy or authority in the future 8. This uncertainty highlights the need for further clarification on the legal boundaries of military engagement in Mexico.

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The assertion that the U.S. military has no authority to conduct drone strikes against Mexican drug cartels is substantiated by official statements from Pentagon officials, which indicate a clear legal framework that prohibits such actions without explicit permission from Mexico or a UN mandate. The designation of these cartels as foreign terrorist organizations does not automatically grant the military the authority to engage in strikes. Additionally, the Mexican government's strong opposition to any unilateral military action further reinforces this conclusion.

However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence. The ongoing review by the CIA regarding its authorities suggests that there may be evolving discussions about military engagement in this context, which could potentially alter the current legal landscape. As such, while the current stance is clear, future developments could introduce new complexities.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and stay informed about any changes in policy or legal interpretations regarding military actions in foreign nations.

Sources

  1. AP News. "Pentagon official: US military has no authority to do drone strikes on drug cartels in Mexico." Link
  2. Reuters. "Mexico rejects unilateral US military action after report US is weighing strikes." Link
  3. Reuters. "Trump administration weighs drone strikes on Mexican cartels, NBC News reports." Link
  4. NPR. "Trump Floating Terrorist Label For Mexican Cartels Brings Fears Of Drone Strikes." Link
  5. NBC News. "Trump administration weighs drone strikes on Mexican cartels." Link
  6. Yahoo News. "Pentagon official: US military has no authority to do drone strikes on drug cartels in Mexico." Link
  7. Seattle Times. "U.S. military has no authority to drone strike Mexican drug cartels." Link
  8. CNN. "CIA is reviewing its authorities to use lethal force against drug cartels." Link
  9. Los Angeles Times. "Mexico warns against potential U.S. drone strikes on cartels." Link
  10. U.S. News. "Pentagon Official: US Military Has No Authority to Do Drone Strikes on Drug Cartels in Mexico." Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  Satellite imagery released in July indicates that a U.S. TPS‑75 transportable radar system was damaged during Iran’s June 23 missile strike on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Satellite imagery released in July indicates that a U.S. TPS‑75 transportable radar system was damaged during Iran’s June 23 missile strike on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Satellite imagery released in July indicates that a U.S. TPS‑75 transportable radar system was damaged during Iran’s June 23 missile strike on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: U.S. military has no authority to drone strike Mexican drug cartels | TruthOrFake Blog