Fact Check: US-China trade talks show potential for easing soybean tariffs.

Fact Check: US-China trade talks show potential for easing soybean tariffs.

Published June 28, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: US-China Trade Talks Show Potential for Easing Soybean Tariffs ## What We Know Recent developments in the US-China trade negotiations i...

Fact Check: US-China Trade Talks Show Potential for Easing Soybean Tariffs

What We Know

Recent developments in the US-China trade negotiations indicate a significant reduction in tariffs, particularly affecting agricultural products like soybeans. According to a report by NPR, the United States and China have agreed to cut tariffs on each other's goods, with U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports dropping from at least 145% to a base levy of 30%, and Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods decreasing from at least 125% to 10%. This agreement is part of a temporary truce lasting 90 days, aimed at easing the ongoing trade war that has impacted global markets and economies.

The negotiations were described as "candid, in-depth, and constructive," with both sides expressing a commitment to balanced trade and continued discussions on various issues, including fentanyl smuggling (NPR). The agreement has been welcomed by U.S. farmers, who have faced significant challenges due to previous high tariffs on soybeans, which had severely limited their access to the Chinese market, the largest importer of soybeans globally.

Analysis

The claim regarding the easing of soybean tariffs is supported by multiple credible sources. The NPR article outlines the specifics of the tariff reductions and the context of the negotiations, highlighting the importance of these discussions for U.S. agricultural exports, particularly soybeans (NPR). Furthermore, a report from Reuters emphasizes that U.S. farmers are still concerned about China's remaining duties on U.S. soybeans, despite the recent tariff cuts. This indicates that while there is potential for easing, challenges remain in fully restoring trade levels.

Additionally, the World Economic Forum notes that the trade dispute has seen significant escalations and retaliatory measures, but the recent agreement marks a critical step towards resolving some of these tensions. The temporary nature of the tariff reductions, however, introduces an element of uncertainty, as these concessions could be reversed if negotiations falter.

While the immediate impact of the tariff reductions is positive, with soybean prices responding favorably (DTN), the long-term implications depend on the continuation of negotiations and the establishment of a stable trade framework. The reliability of the sources used in this analysis is high, as they include established news organizations and trade-focused publications that provide in-depth coverage of economic issues.

Conclusion

The claim that US-China trade talks show potential for easing soybean tariffs is True. The recent agreement to temporarily reduce tariffs on both sides demonstrates a willingness to negotiate and could lead to improved conditions for U.S. soybean exports. However, the temporary nature of these reductions and the existing duties still in place suggest that while progress has been made, the situation remains fluid and requires ongoing attention.

Sources

  1. U.S. and China announce deal to temporarily cut tariffs : NPR
  2. US farmers say Brazil keeps edge in China's soy market ...
  3. Tracking tariffs: Key moments in the US-China trade dispute
  4. Soybean Prices Quickly Respond to China, US Temporarily Rolling Back ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Trump imposed 30% Tariffs on Mexico and The European Union today. Marking another unnecessary trade negotiation that is going to hurt the American people and strain our relationship with close allies. They will come into effect in around 20 days..
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump imposed 30% Tariffs on Mexico and The European Union today. Marking another unnecessary trade negotiation that is going to hurt the American people and strain our relationship with close allies. They will come into effect in around 20 days..

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump imposed 30% Tariffs on Mexico and The European Union today. Marking another unnecessary trade negotiation that is going to hurt the American people and strain our relationship with close allies. They will come into effect in around 20 days..

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: China's government spent 42 billion this year on a consumer trade-in program.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: China's government spent 42 billion this year on a consumer trade-in program.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: China's government spent 42 billion this year on a consumer trade-in program.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Brazil is benefiting from U.S. trade tensions by increasing exports to China.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Brazil is benefiting from U.S. trade tensions by increasing exports to China.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Brazil is benefiting from U.S. trade tensions by increasing exports to China.

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Companies must now pay higher tariffs on inputs used in foreign trade zones.
True

Fact Check: Companies must now pay higher tariffs on inputs used in foreign trade zones.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Companies must now pay higher tariffs on inputs used in foreign trade zones.

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Shenzhen Kate Plastic Products fights to stay relevant amid US-China trade war.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Shenzhen Kate Plastic Products fights to stay relevant amid US-China trade war.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Shenzhen Kate Plastic Products fights to stay relevant amid US-China trade war.

Jun 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: US-China trade talks show potential for easing soybean tariffs. | TruthOrFake Blog