Fact Check: "U.N. nuclear chief Rafael Grossi told the Security Council that the above-ground section of the Natanz facility was destroyed."
What We Know
The claim states that Rafael Grossi, the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), informed the United Nations Security Council that the above-ground section of the Natanz nuclear facility in Iran was destroyed. Reports indicate that there were recent airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, including Natanz, which resulted in damage to some above-ground facilities. However, it has been confirmed that the deeply buried uranium enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow have not been significantly damaged (Washington Post).
In a statement made by Grossi, he acknowledged the attacks on the Natanz site but did not confirm the complete destruction of its above-ground facilities. Instead, he stated that "only the Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant site has been attacked" (IAEA). This suggests that while damage occurred, it does not equate to total destruction as claimed.
Analysis
The claim appears to misinterpret or misrepresent Grossi's statements regarding the situation at Natanz. The IAEA's reports and Grossi's own statements indicate that while there was damage to the facility, it was not of a nature that would constitute total destruction. Experts have noted that the airstrikes did not eliminate the operational capabilities of the facility, particularly the underground components, which are crucial for uranium enrichment (Washington Post).
The sources used to assess this claim include the IAEA's official statements and reports from reputable news organizations. The IAEA is a credible source as it is the international body responsible for monitoring nuclear activities and ensuring compliance with nuclear non-proliferation agreements. The Washington Post also provides reliable reporting based on expert analysis and satellite imagery, which corroborates the IAEA's findings.
Conclusion
Verdict: False
The claim that Rafael Grossi stated the above-ground section of the Natanz facility was destroyed is misleading. While there was damage to the facility, Grossi did not confirm its total destruction, and reports indicate that significant operational components remain intact. Thus, the assertion does not accurately reflect the situation as reported by credible sources.
