Fact Check: UK's Operation Wedlock spanned 20 years hunting a suspected Russian double agent.

Fact Check: UK's Operation Wedlock spanned 20 years hunting a suspected Russian double agent.

Published June 27, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "UK's Operation Wedlock spanned 20 years hunting a suspected Russian double agent." ## What We Know Operation Wedlock was a significant...

Fact Check: "UK's Operation Wedlock spanned 20 years hunting a suspected Russian double agent."

What We Know

Operation Wedlock was a significant investigation conducted by MI5, the United Kingdom's domestic intelligence agency, aimed at uncovering a suspected Russian double agent within MI6, the UK's foreign intelligence service. This operation reportedly lasted for approximately 20 years, beginning in the mid-1990s and continuing until at least 2015 (Wikipedia, The Guardian). The investigation was prompted by concerns that a high-ranking official within MI6 was leaking sensitive information to the Russian government, which led to an extensive and prolonged search for the mole (The Guardian).

Analysis

The claim that Operation Wedlock spanned 20 years is supported by multiple credible sources. The Wikipedia entry on Operation Wedlock confirms the timeline and purpose of the investigation, stating that it was a 20-year effort by MI5 to identify a suspected Russian double agent within MI6 (Wikipedia). Furthermore, a report by The Guardian elaborates on the details of the operation, indicating that it was a highly sensitive and extensive investigation that lasted from the mid-1990s to at least 2015 (The Guardian).

The reliability of these sources is generally high. Wikipedia entries are often scrutinized and updated, particularly on topics related to national security and intelligence, which tend to attract attention from experts and historians. The Guardian is a reputable news organization known for its investigative journalism, particularly in matters of national security and intelligence (The Guardian).

However, it is important to note that while the sources confirm the duration and purpose of Operation Wedlock, they do not provide exhaustive details about the specific events or findings of the investigation, which may lead to some ambiguity about the operation's outcomes.

Conclusion

The claim that "UK's Operation Wedlock spanned 20 years hunting a suspected Russian double agent" is True. The evidence from reliable sources clearly supports the assertion that Operation Wedlock was a lengthy investigation by MI5 aimed at identifying a suspected mole within MI6, lasting from the mid-1990s until at least 2015.

Sources

  1. Operation Wedlock - Wikipedia
  2. Oleg Gordievsky - Wikipedia
  3. Suspected spies for Russia held in major UK security investigation - BBC
  4. UK launches decades-long hunt for alleged Russian spy inside MI6
  5. UK launched huge operation to find suspected Russian double agent in MI6

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: HMS Spey's patrol is UK's first in Taiwan Strait in four years.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: HMS Spey's patrol is UK's first in Taiwan Strait in four years.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: HMS Spey's patrol is UK's first in Taiwan Strait in four years.

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: ICE agents conducted a targeted enforcement operation to arrest illegal aliens.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: ICE agents conducted a targeted enforcement operation to arrest illegal aliens.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: ICE agents conducted a targeted enforcement operation to arrest illegal aliens.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The fossil fuel industry runs the biggest and most malevolent propaganda operation ever seen.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The fossil fuel industry runs the biggest and most malevolent propaganda operation ever seen.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The fossil fuel industry runs the biggest and most malevolent propaganda operation ever seen.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: An Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) liaison officer ordered snipers to shoot Palestinian children during a humanitarian aid operation.
False

Fact Check: An Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) liaison officer ordered snipers to shoot Palestinian children during a humanitarian aid operation.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: An Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) liaison officer ordered snipers to shoot Palestinian children during a humanitarian aid operation.

Aug 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Former Georgia
Democratic House candidate Carl Sprayberry, who publicly called for the assassination of President Donald Trump in a social media post, has been arrested as part of a sweeping, multi-agency childtrafficking operation.
Unverified

Fact Check: Former Georgia Democratic House candidate Carl Sprayberry, who publicly called for the assassination of President Donald Trump in a social media post, has been arrested as part of a sweeping, multi-agency childtrafficking operation.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Former Georgia Democratic House candidate Carl Sprayberry, who publicly called for the assassination of President Donald Trump in a social media post, has been arrested as part of a sweeping, multi-agency childtrafficking operation.

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →