Fact Check: Trump's USAID cuts have already led to deaths.

Published July 12, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Trump's USAID cuts have already led to deaths." ## What We Know The claim that cuts to the United States Agency for International Deve...

Fact Check: "Trump's USAID cuts have already led to deaths."

What We Know

The claim that cuts to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the Trump administration have already resulted in deaths is supported by various studies and expert analyses. According to Brooke Nichols, an associate professor of global health, the cessation of USAID funding has led to significant increases in mortality rates from diseases such as HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis. Nichols' tracking tools estimate that if funding is not restored, more than 176,000 additional adults and children could die from HIV alone by the end of 2025, with at least 62,000 additional deaths from tuberculosis expected in the same timeframe.

Furthermore, a study published in The Lancet estimates that if the current cuts persist through 2030, up to 14 million lives could be lost due to the disruption of essential health services funded by USAID. This study highlights that high levels of USAID funding have historically been associated with a 15% reduction in deaths from any cause and a 32% reduction in deaths among children under five years old, indicating the critical role of USAID in global health outcomes.

Analysis

While the evidence suggests a potential for increased mortality due to USAID funding cuts, it is important to note that the estimates provided are projections based on the continuation of current policies rather than confirmed deaths that have already occurred. The Impact Counter platform, which tracks anticipated deaths, reflects a methodology that uses existing data to model expected outcomes based on the cessation of funding. This approach is valuable for understanding the potential human cost of policy decisions, but it does not provide concrete evidence of deaths that have already taken place as a direct result of the cuts.

Moreover, the credibility of the sources cited, including peer-reviewed studies and expert commentary, lends weight to the claims made. However, there is also a degree of uncertainty inherent in projecting future deaths based on funding changes, as various factors can influence health outcomes in different regions. The estimates rely on historical data and assumptions about the continuation of health programs, which may not fully account for local adaptations or alternative funding sources that could mitigate some of the anticipated impacts.

Conclusion

The claim that "Trump's USAID cuts have already led to deaths" is Partially True. While there is strong evidence indicating that the cuts could lead to significant increases in mortality rates in the future, the assertion that deaths have already occurred as a direct result of these funding cuts remains speculative. The projections provided by experts highlight a concerning trend that could have dire consequences if funding is not restored, but they do not confirm immediate fatalities linked directly to the cuts.

Sources

  1. Tracking Anticipated Deaths from USAID Funding Cuts
  2. Study: 14 million lives could be lost due to Trump aid cuts
  3. Trump's aid cut risks causing 14 million deaths, report finds
  4. USAID cuts may cause over 14 million additional deaths by ...
  5. Over 14 million people could die from Trump administration ...
  6. Evaluating the impact of two decades of USAID ...
  7. Bill Gates says Trump's cuts to USAID are devastating
  8. The Forecasted Death Toll of Shuttering USAID | TIME

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Trump's reading ability
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump's reading ability

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's reading ability

Aug 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's number one promise was
to lower prices. Prices are up
especially on meat.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump's number one promise was to lower prices. Prices are up especially on meat.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's number one promise was to lower prices. Prices are up especially on meat.

Aug 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's name appears in the Epstein files 64 times,
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump's name appears in the Epstein files 64 times,

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's name appears in the Epstein files 64 times,

Aug 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
Are Trump's approval ratings in
the tank? Let's check it out. I
mean every politician would
like this number here
especially to see it go up. How
about compared to other
presidents who are Republicans?
Yeah. It's history making. It's
history making. What are we
talking about here? So why
don't we look back? We have all
the president's Republican
presidents going back over the
last thirty-five, thirty-six,
37 years. What are we talking
about? GOP who strongly
approved 5 months in. Look at
this. George, HW Bush, Bush
forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three,
fifty you see Trump the first
00:31
term 53, but look at this 63%
he beats all the other
Republicans on the board here
and I was looking even back
since Reagan and get this
Donald Trump beats Ronald
Reagan when it comes to the
strongly approved five months
and of course Reagan was coming
off that high after that
assassination attempt so the
bottom line is Donald Trump is
making history with the
Republican base he is more
beloved by this Republican base
than any Republican base loved
any GOP president 5 months in.
It is history making. Even CNN
01:03
is telling the truth. Feels
like hell might be freezing
over.
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Are Trump's approval ratings in the tank? Let's check it out. I mean every politician would like this number here especially to see it go up. How about compared to other presidents who are Republicans? Yeah. It's history making. It's history making. What are we talking about here? So why don't we look back? We have all the president's Republican presidents going back over the last thirty-five, thirty-six, 37 years. What are we talking about? GOP who strongly approved 5 months in. Look at this. George, HW Bush, Bush forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three, fifty you see Trump the first 00:31 term 53, but look at this 63% he beats all the other Republicans on the board here and I was looking even back since Reagan and get this Donald Trump beats Ronald Reagan when it comes to the strongly approved five months and of course Reagan was coming off that high after that assassination attempt so the bottom line is Donald Trump is making history with the Republican base he is more beloved by this Republican base than any Republican base loved any GOP president 5 months in. It is history making. Even CNN 01:03 is telling the truth. Feels like hell might be freezing over.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Are Trump's approval ratings in the tank? Let's check it out. I mean every politician would like this number here especially to see it go up. How about compared to other presidents who are Republicans? Yeah. It's history making. It's history making. What are we talking about here? So why don't we look back? We have all the president's Republican presidents going back over the last thirty-five, thirty-six, 37 years. What are we talking about? GOP who strongly approved 5 months in. Look at this. George, HW Bush, Bush forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three, fifty you see Trump the first 00:31 term 53, but look at this 63% he beats all the other Republicans on the board here and I was looking even back since Reagan and get this Donald Trump beats Ronald Reagan when it comes to the strongly approved five months and of course Reagan was coming off that high after that assassination attempt so the bottom line is Donald Trump is making history with the Republican base he is more beloved by this Republican base than any Republican base loved any GOP president 5 months in. It is history making. Even CNN 01:03 is telling the truth. Feels like hell might be freezing over.

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Wall Street Journal also published Trump's denial in writing lewd birthday card to his best friend Jeffrey Epstein that ended with " every day be another wonderful secret. in his denial Trump claims: "This is not This is fake thing...l have never wrote picture in my life" Annie? Rauwerda
Partially True

Fact Check: The Wall Street Journal also published Trump's denial in writing lewd birthday card to his best friend Jeffrey Epstein that ended with " every day be another wonderful secret. in his denial Trump claims: "This is not This is fake thing...l have never wrote picture in my life" Annie? Rauwerda

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Wall Street Journal also published Trump's denial in writing lewd birthday card to his best friend Jeffrey Epstein that ended with " every day be another wonderful secret. in his denial Trump claims: "This is not This is fake thing...l have never wrote picture in my life" Annie? Rauwerda

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Last week,
we call for a full-scale
investigation into Trump's
abysmal handling of the Texas
floods and Senator Ruben
Gallego agrees. He's calling
for a full-scale investigation
because we've gotta know what
happened.
Partially True

Fact Check: Last week, we call for a full-scale investigation into Trump's abysmal handling of the Texas floods and Senator Ruben Gallego agrees. He's calling for a full-scale investigation because we've gotta know what happened.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Last week, we call for a full-scale investigation into Trump's abysmal handling of the Texas floods and Senator Ruben Gallego agrees. He's calling for a full-scale investigation because we've gotta know what happened.

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →