Fact Check: "Trump's hotel plans come amid ongoing Israel-Iran war."
What We Know
The claim that "Trump's hotel plans come amid ongoing Israel-Iran war" is rooted in recent developments regarding a potential Trump hotel in Tel Aviv. According to a report by The New York Times, discussions about a partnership for a hotel in the Sarona district of Tel Aviv were ongoing as of June 2025. These talks involved Eric Trump, who indicated that the Trump Organization was interested in managing the property, which is currently under construction and expected to be the tallest hotel in the city.
The context of these discussions coincides with heightened tensions in the region, particularly following missile strikes from Iran targeting Israel on June 13, 2025, as part of a broader conflict that has seen military actions from both sides (AP News). The situation escalated to a point where President Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran shortly after the missile attacks, although both countries accused each other of violating the terms of this ceasefire (NPR).
Analysis
The claim is partially true. While it accurately states that discussions regarding a Trump hotel in Tel Aviv are taking place amid ongoing military conflict between Israel and Iran, the specifics of the situation are nuanced. The hotel discussions were described as "preliminary," and Eric Trump himself stated that there were "no plans at this time" for a deal, indicating a cautious approach given the volatile environment (The New York Times).
Furthermore, the timing of the hotel discussions aligns with significant military actions, including Israel's airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and Iran's retaliatory missile strikes. This backdrop of conflict complicates the Trump Organization's potential business dealings in the region, as any Trump-branded property could become a target due to the geopolitical tensions (Reuters).
In evaluating the sources, The New York Times is a reputable publication known for its investigative journalism, while AP News and NPR also provide reliable reporting on international affairs. However, the framing of the claim could suggest a more direct connection between the hotel plans and the war than what the evidence supports, as the discussions were not directly instigated by the conflict but were ongoing prior to the recent escalations.
Conclusion
The verdict is Partially True. The assertion that Trump's hotel plans are occurring amid an Israel-Iran war is accurate in terms of timing and context. However, the discussions about the hotel are described as preliminary and cautious, reflecting the complexities and risks involved in pursuing business opportunities in a conflict zone. Thus, while the claim holds some truth, it lacks the nuance that the discussions were not initiated by the war and may not proceed due to the ongoing tensions.
