Fact Check: Trump's DHS claims anti-terrorism funding was wasteful and partisan.

Published June 30, 2025

•By

VERDICT

Needs Research

# Fact Check: Trump's DHS Claims Anti-Terrorism Funding Was Wasteful and Partisan ## What We Know The claim that "Trump's DHS claims anti-terrorism f...

Fact Check: Trump's DHS Claims Anti-Terrorism Funding Was Wasteful and Partisan

What We Know

The claim that "Trump's DHS claims anti-terrorism funding was wasteful and partisan" suggests that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under Donald Trump characterized certain anti-terrorism funding as ineffective and politically motivated. However, there is a lack of direct evidence from credible sources that specifically supports this assertion.

While the DHS has made various statements regarding funding and its allocation, the specifics of these claims, particularly labeling them as "wasteful" or "partisan," are not well-documented in the available literature. For instance, discussions around funding often focus on budget cuts or reallocations, but do not explicitly label the funding as wasteful or partisan in a comprehensive manner (source-1, source-2).

Analysis

The assertion appears to be a summary of broader criticisms that have been levied against various government funding initiatives during Trump's administration. However, the sources available do not provide a robust foundation for this specific claim. The articles reviewed focus on different aspects of Trump's presidency, such as his relationships with foreign leaders and personal branding efforts, rather than providing detailed insights into DHS funding decisions or statements made by the department regarding anti-terrorism funding (source-3, source-4).

The credibility of the sources is also a concern. Many of the articles are from JForum, which is primarily focused on Jewish and Israeli news, and may not provide a balanced view on U.S. domestic policy issues. Additionally, the snippets do not directly address the claim about DHS's stance on anti-terrorism funding, indicating a gap in the evidence needed to substantiate the claim (source-5, source-6).

Conclusion

Based on the available evidence, the claim that "Trump's DHS claims anti-terrorism funding was wasteful and partisan" lacks sufficient support. The sources do not provide direct quotes or statements from the DHS that clearly articulate this position. Therefore, the verdict is Needs Research. Further investigation is required to find credible sources that specifically address the DHS's views on anti-terrorism funding during Trump's administration.

Sources

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:

"Coffee helps you live longer"

✓100% Free

✓No Registration

✓Instant Results