Fact Check: Trump won by landslide in 2024

Fact Check: Trump won by landslide in 2024

Published April 8, 2025
VERDICT
Mostly False

# The Claim: "Trump won by landslide in 2024" In the aftermath of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, various sources have reported that Donald Trum...

The Claim: "Trump won by landslide in 2024"

In the aftermath of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, various sources have reported that Donald Trump achieved a "landslide" victory against his Democratic opponent, Kamala Harris. This claim has sparked debate regarding the definition of a landslide and the actual margins of victory in both the popular and electoral votes. This article will explore the available evidence surrounding this claim while critically evaluating the reliability of the sources.

What We Know

  1. Electoral and Popular Vote Results: According to the official results from the Federal Election Commission, Trump won 312 of the 538 electoral votes and secured approximately 49.9% of the popular vote, leading by a margin of about 2.3 million votes over Harris 23.

  2. Analysis of Voting Data: A report from the Medill Journalism School indicates that Trump won 91% of counties classified as "news deserts," which may suggest strong local support in less populated areas 1.

  3. Contrasting Perspectives: Some analyses argue that the election was not a landslide. For instance, ABC News reported that Trump won several key swing states by narrow margins, often less than four points, which challenges the characterization of his victory as a landslide 7.

  4. Historical Context: Comparisons to past elections indicate that the 2024 election was one of the closest in U.S. history, with only 0.15% of voters determining the outcome, which raises questions about the appropriateness of labeling it a landslide 8.

  5. Media Coverage: Various media outlets, including the BBC and The New York Times, reported on the election results, with some headlines emphasizing Trump's popular vote win and others highlighting the narrow margins in key states 45.

Analysis

The claim that Trump won by a landslide in 2024 is contentious and depends heavily on the definitions and metrics used to assess electoral victories.

  • Source Credibility: The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is a reliable source for official election results 2. However, analyses from media outlets and academic institutions can vary in their interpretations and may reflect biases. For example, the Washington Times, which has a conservative editorial stance, described Trump's victory as a "landslide" without providing detailed context on the margins 10.

  • Methodological Concerns: The analysis by Medill Journalism School focuses on specific demographics (news deserts) and may not represent the overall voting landscape 1. While it provides interesting insights, the broader implications of such localized support require further examination.

  • Conflicting Claims: The contrasting views from sources like ABC News and The Hill emphasize the narrowness of Trump's victories in swing states, suggesting that labeling the election as a landslide may be misleading 78. These sources provide a more nuanced view that challenges the notion of a decisive win.

  • Public Perception and Bias: The framing of Trump's victory as a landslide may resonate with certain political biases, particularly among his supporters. This could influence the interpretation of data and the emphasis placed on specific aspects of the election results.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly False

The claim that Donald Trump won the 2024 election by a landslide is mostly false. While Trump did secure a significant number of electoral votes and a majority of the popular vote, the margins of victory in key states were narrow, and the overall election results were among the closest in U.S. history. The characterization of a "landslide" victory is not supported by the evidence, particularly when considering the small percentage of voters that ultimately determined the outcome.

It is important to note that the definition of a landslide can vary, and interpretations of the election results may be influenced by political biases. The evidence indicates that while Trump had substantial support, the election was highly competitive, which complicates the assertion of a decisive victory.

Limitations in the available evidence include potential biases in reporting and analysis, as well as the varying definitions of what constitutes a landslide. Readers should critically evaluate the information presented and consider multiple perspectives when assessing claims related to electoral outcomes.

Sources

  1. In news deserts, Trump won in a landslide | Local News Initiative. Retrieved from Local News Initiative
  2. Official 2024 Presidential General Election Results - FEC.gov. Retrieved from FEC.gov
  3. Was the 2024 US Election Truly a Landslide Win for ... Retrieved from RSIS
  4. Just how big was Donald Trump's election victory? Retrieved from BBC
  5. Presidential Election Results: Trump Wins. Retrieved from New York Times
  6. 2024 Presidential Election Results. Retrieved from AP News
  7. The 2024 presidential election was close, not a landslide. Retrieved from ABC News
  8. A landslide? Just 0.15 percent of all voters determined Trump's 2024 ... Retrieved from The Hill
  9. The size of Donald Trump's 2024 election victory ... Retrieved from PBS
  10. Donald Trump's landslide win resets political landscape - Washington Times. Retrieved from Washington Times

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Trump a pathological liar
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump a pathological liar

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump a pathological liar

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: is there evidence that Trump won the 2020 election
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: is there evidence that Trump won the 2020 election

Detailed fact-check analysis of: is there evidence that Trump won the 2020 election

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.
True

Fact Check: DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU.

✅ No tax on tips.
✅ No tax on overtime.
✅ Medicare protected.
Partially True

Fact Check: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU. ✅ No tax on tips. ✅ No tax on overtime. ✅ Medicare protected.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU. ✅ No tax on tips. ✅ No tax on overtime. ✅ Medicare protected.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein.

wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ.

how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ.

so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times.

The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump.

oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work?

does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you.

we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’

you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls.

it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is.

let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time:

‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’
Partially True

Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump won by landslide in 2024 | TruthOrFake Blog