Fact Check: Trump is bad

Fact Check: Trump is bad

Published May 13, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
i
VERDICT
Misleading

# Claim Analysis: "Trump is bad" ## Introduction The claim "Trump is bad" is a subjective assertion that reflects a negative opinion about former Pre...

Claim Analysis: "Trump is bad"

Introduction

The claim "Trump is bad" is a subjective assertion that reflects a negative opinion about former President Donald Trump. This statement can be interpreted in various ways, including his performance in office, public approval ratings, or personal conduct. Given the complexity of political opinions and the polarized nature of American politics, it is essential to analyze the evidence surrounding Trump's approval ratings and public perception to understand the context of this claim.

What We Know

  1. Approval Ratings: Recent polls indicate that Donald Trump's approval ratings have been fluctuating and are currently lower than they were shortly after he took office. For example, a poll from the University of Texas/Texas Politics Project shows that Trump's approval rating has fallen to 47% due to economic concerns among Texans 1. Similarly, a New York Times report states that his approval rating has decreased from 52% to approximately 45% 2.

  2. Economic Perception: According to a Washington Post-ABC-Ipsos poll, Trump's economic approval rating has dropped to 39%, with 61% of respondents expressing negative views about his handling of economic issues 3. This decline in economic approval is significant, as economic performance is often a critical factor in presidential approval.

  3. General Trends: The Economist has tracked Trump's approval ratings, noting a general downward trend in public perception 45. A recent Newsweek article highlights that Trump's approval has turned negative in a majority of states, including swing states that previously supported him 7.

  4. Polling Variability: Different polls show varying results regarding Trump's approval ratings. For instance, a Big Data poll indicated that 48% of respondents approve of Trump, while other polls suggest a more negative perception overall 69. This variability raises questions about the reliability of individual polls and how they may reflect broader public sentiment.

  5. Demographic Shifts: Pew Research Center data reveals that Trump's approval has declined significantly among various demographic groups, particularly among Asian Americans, where approval dropped from 47% to a much lower figure within a few months 10.

Analysis

The claim that "Trump is bad" can be supported by the evidence of declining approval ratings and negative public perception. However, the interpretation of these ratings requires careful consideration of the sources and methodologies used in polling.

  1. Source Reliability: The sources cited include reputable organizations such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Pew Research Center, which are generally considered reliable for political analysis. However, it's essential to note that polling data can be influenced by various factors, including the timing of the polls, sample sizes, and demographic representation.

  2. Potential Bias: Some sources may have inherent biases based on their editorial slants. For instance, The Washington Post and The New York Times are often viewed as leaning liberal, which may affect how they report on Trump. Conversely, sources like Newsweek may have varying editorial perspectives, which could influence their interpretation of polling data.

  3. Methodological Concerns: Polling methodologies can vary significantly. For example, the way questions are framed can influence responses. Polls that focus on specific issues, such as economic performance, may yield different results than those that assess overall approval. Furthermore, the timing of polls can coincide with significant events that may skew public perception temporarily.

  4. Conflicting Data: The existence of conflicting data—such as the Big Data poll showing a higher approval rating—highlights the complexity of public opinion. This inconsistency suggests that while some individuals may view Trump favorably, a substantial portion of the population does not, indicating a divided electorate.

  5. Contextual Factors: The economic climate, ongoing political controversies, and Trump's own actions during his presidency all contribute to public perception. Understanding these factors is crucial in evaluating the claim that "Trump is bad," as they provide context for the approval ratings and public sentiment.

Conclusion

Verdict: Misleading

The claim that "Trump is bad" is misleading due to its subjective nature and the complexity of public opinion surrounding Donald Trump's presidency. While evidence indicates declining approval ratings and negative perceptions, these ratings are influenced by various factors, including economic conditions, demographic shifts, and the inherent biases of polling sources. The variability in polling data further complicates the interpretation of public sentiment, suggesting that while many view Trump unfavorably, a significant portion of the electorate still supports him.

It is important to recognize the limitations of the available evidence, as polling methodologies can differ, and results may not fully capture the nuances of public opinion. Additionally, the claim's subjective nature means that it cannot be definitively categorized as "true" or "false." Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider multiple perspectives when forming their opinions on political figures and issues.

Sources

  1. University of Texas / Texas Politics Project Poll: https://texaspolitics.utexas.edu/blog/new-ut-texas-politics-project-poll-economic-uncertainty-hurts-trump-ratings-in-texas-looms-over-the-legislature
  2. The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/23/us/politics/trump-approval-rating.html
  3. The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/04/27/trump-poll-approval-rating-100-days/
  4. The Economist: https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker
  5. The Economist: https://www.economist.com/united-states/2025/04/16/donald-trumps-approval-rating-is-dropping
  6. Newsweek: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-approval-rating-latest-2070803
  7. Newsweek: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-approval-rating-turns-negative-majority-states-2070263
  8. Gallup: https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx
  9. Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2025/05/09/trump-approval-rating-tracker-post-tariff-dive-tapers/
  10. Pew Research Center: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/04/23/evaluations-of-trump-job-approval-and-confidence-on-issues/

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Did Trump pay off girls that he abused that were 10-13 years old?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Did Trump pay off girls that he abused that were 10-13 years old?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did Trump pay off girls that he abused that were 10-13 years old?

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein introduced 14-year-old victim to Donald Trump at Mar-a Mar-a-Lago, Ghislaine Maxwell trial testimony reveals
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein introduced 14-year-old victim to Donald Trump at Mar-a Mar-a-Lago, Ghislaine Maxwell trial testimony reveals

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jeffrey Epstein introduced 14-year-old victim to Donald Trump at Mar-a Mar-a-Lago, Ghislaine Maxwell trial testimony reveals

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: After the phase of the Trump presidency, where he's no longer answering questions, he's reacting to the sound of them. Now, I want you to watch this very carefully. Peter Doocy, Fox News reporter, of all people, tosses Trump a softball question. Do you think there's a threat of a left-wing militia targeting ICE? You know, a simple yes or no, or let me talk about Antrifa, would have probably done the trick. But instead, Trump just starts saying random words. I do not believe that Trump has the cognitive capacity to parse, understand, and meaningfully respond to most questions.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: After the phase of the Trump presidency, where he's no longer answering questions, he's reacting to the sound of them. Now, I want you to watch this very carefully. Peter Doocy, Fox News reporter, of all people, tosses Trump a softball question. Do you think there's a threat of a left-wing militia targeting ICE? You know, a simple yes or no, or let me talk about Antrifa, would have probably done the trick. But instead, Trump just starts saying random words. I do not believe that Trump has the cognitive capacity to parse, understand, and meaningfully respond to most questions.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: After the phase of the Trump presidency, where he's no longer answering questions, he's reacting to the sound of them. Now, I want you to watch this very carefully. Peter Doocy, Fox News reporter, of all people, tosses Trump a softball question. Do you think there's a threat of a left-wing militia targeting ICE? You know, a simple yes or no, or let me talk about Antrifa, would have probably done the trick. But instead, Trump just starts saying random words. I do not believe that Trump has the cognitive capacity to parse, understand, and meaningfully respond to most questions.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: “ICE agents are raiding L.A. in masks without badges, names, or accountability. They ignore city and state leaders. They answer only to Trump, Stephen Miller, and Kristi Noem.So the Save America Movement is launching Liberty Vans: 𝗺𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘀, 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀, 𝗹𝗮𝘄𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀 & 𝘃𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀. 𝗪𝗲’𝗹𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗜𝗖𝗘 𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗱𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲, 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀.
It'll cost $500,000 to launch this operation in L.A. and expand nationwide.”🧵
Partially True

Fact Check: “ICE agents are raiding L.A. in masks without badges, names, or accountability. They ignore city and state leaders. They answer only to Trump, Stephen Miller, and Kristi Noem.So the Save America Movement is launching Liberty Vans: 𝗺𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘀, 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀, 𝗹𝗮𝘄𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀 & 𝘃𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀. 𝗪𝗲’𝗹𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗜𝗖𝗘 𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗱𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲, 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀. It'll cost $500,000 to launch this operation in L.A. and expand nationwide.”🧵

Detailed fact-check analysis of: “ICE agents are raiding L.A. in masks without badges, names, or accountability. They ignore city and state leaders. They answer only to Trump, Stephen Miller, and Kristi Noem.So the Save America Movement is launching Liberty Vans: 𝗺𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘀, 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀, 𝗹𝗮𝘄𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀 & 𝘃𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀. 𝗪𝗲’𝗹𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗜𝗖𝗘 𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗱𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲, 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀. It'll cost $500,000 to launch this operation in L.A. and expand nationwide.”🧵

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.
Partially True

Fact Check: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  ICE just received $45 billion in funding for the next 4 years - more than the U.S. government spent on immigration detention during the Obama, Biden, and first Trump administrations Combined
True

Fact Check: ICE just received $45 billion in funding for the next 4 years - more than the U.S. government spent on immigration detention during the Obama, Biden, and first Trump administrations Combined

Detailed fact-check analysis of: ICE just received $45 billion in funding for the next 4 years - more than the U.S. government spent on immigration detention during the Obama, Biden, and first Trump administrations Combined

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump is bad | TruthOrFake Blog