Fact Check: Trump had sought a hearing before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit after a three-judge panel declined to overturn the judgment.

Fact Check: Trump had sought a hearing before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit after a three-judge panel declined to overturn the judgment.

June 14, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Trump Seeks Hearing Before Full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ## What We Know The claim that "Trump had sought a hearing be...

Fact Check: Trump Seeks Hearing Before Full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit

What We Know

The claim that "Trump had sought a hearing before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit after a three-judge panel declined to overturn the judgment" is supported by multiple sources. Following a jury's verdict in 2023, which found Trump liable for battery and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, Trump attempted to challenge this ruling. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit denied his request for an en banc hearing, which would involve the full bench of the court reviewing the case after a three-judge panel had already upheld the jury's decision (ABC News, CNBC).

The appellate court's decision came without explanation, which is a common practice in such cases. A divided opinion from the court indicated that there was "no manifest error by the district court" that would warrant further review (ABC News).

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim is robust. Reports from reputable news outlets like ABC News and CNBC confirm that Trump did indeed seek a rehearing before the full 2nd Circuit after a three-judge panel had upheld the jury's verdict (ABC News, CNBC). The sources are credible, as they are established news organizations known for their journalistic standards.

The lack of a detailed explanation from the court regarding the denial of the en banc hearing is typical in appellate court proceedings, where such decisions often do not require public justification (ABC News). The dissenting opinion from Judge Steven Menashi, a Trump appointee, adds nuance to the situation, suggesting that there were differing views on the merits of the case, but it does not contradict the fact that Trump sought further review (ABC News).

Overall, the claim is substantiated by multiple credible sources, and the context surrounding the legal proceedings adds to the reliability of the information.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that Trump sought a hearing before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit after a three-judge panel declined to overturn the judgment is accurate. The evidence from multiple credible news sources confirms that Trump made this request following the unfavorable ruling from the three-judge panel.

Sources

  1. Supreme Court Procedures
  2. Appeals court rejects Trump's bid to challenge $5 million E. Jean Carroll judgment
  3. Trump loses bid to rehear E. Jean Carroll case appeal

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Judge Steven Menashi, a Trump appointee, dissented in the appeals court ruling, arguing that the district court should have allowed evidence regarding Trump's belief that Carroll's lawsuit was politically motivated.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Judge Steven Menashi, a Trump appointee, dissented in the appeals court ruling, arguing that the district court should have allowed evidence regarding Trump's belief that Carroll's lawsuit was politically motivated.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Judge Steven Menashi, a Trump appointee, dissented in the appeals court ruling, arguing that the district court should have allowed evidence regarding Trump's belief that Carroll's lawsuit was politically motivated.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision and that Trump's legal efforts have failed.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision and that Trump's legal efforts have failed.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: E. Jean Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, stated on October 27, 2023, that Carroll is pleased with the appeals court's decision and that Trump's legal efforts have failed.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The federal government filed an appeal against a federal judge's ruling that deemed Trump's deployment of National Guard troops illegal.
True

Fact Check: The federal government filed an appeal against a federal judge's ruling that deemed Trump's deployment of National Guard troops illegal.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The federal government filed an appeal against a federal judge's ruling that deemed Trump's deployment of National Guard troops illegal.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Trump administration reduced the staff of the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships from 45 full-time employees and several dozen contract workers to just a handful of employees.
Partially True

Fact Check: The Trump administration reduced the staff of the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships from 45 full-time employees and several dozen contract workers to just a handful of employees.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Trump administration reduced the staff of the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships from 45 full-time employees and several dozen contract workers to just a handful of employees.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The New York Times was the first to report the Trump administration's decision to limit ICE enforcement at farms, hotels, and restaurants.
True

Fact Check: The New York Times was the first to report the Trump administration's decision to limit ICE enforcement at farms, hotels, and restaurants.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The New York Times was the first to report the Trump administration's decision to limit ICE enforcement at farms, hotels, and restaurants.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump had sought a hearing before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit after a three-judge panel declined to overturn the judgment. | TruthOrFake Blog