Fact Check: "Trump celebrates historic peace deal ending nearly 30 years of conflict."
What We Know
On June 27, 2025, President Donald Trump announced the signing of a U.S.-brokered peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Rwanda, which he claimed would end nearly 30 years of conflict in the region. During the signing ceremony, Trump stated, "today the violence and destruction comes to an end," and emphasized that this agreement would usher in "a new chapter of hope and opportunity" for the region (ABC News). The conflict in question has deep historical roots, primarily stemming from the aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan genocide and subsequent regional tensions, which have resulted in millions of deaths since the late 1990s (CNN).
The peace deal includes provisions for ending support for non-state armed groups, the return of refugees, and the establishment of a joint security mechanism to address disputes (ABC News). However, critics argue that the deal may not address the underlying issues driving the conflict and could lead to further resource exploitation in the mineral-rich region (CNN).
Analysis
While the claim that Trump celebrated a peace deal is accurate, the assertion that it will definitively end nearly 30 years of conflict is more complex. The DRC and Rwanda have been embroiled in a multifaceted conflict involving various armed groups, and previous peace agreements have often failed to bring lasting stability (CNN). The recent agreement has not been universally accepted, as key militia groups, such as the M23, have not committed to disarmament and have expressed intentions to pursue separate negotiations (CNN).
The credibility of the sources reporting on this event varies. Major news outlets like ABC News and CNN provide detailed accounts of the signing and the context of the conflict, making them reliable sources for understanding the situation (ABC News, CNN). However, the optimistic framing by Trump and his administration raises questions about potential bias, as they may emphasize the deal's significance to bolster their diplomatic achievements (ABC News, CNN).
Furthermore, experts have warned that without addressing the root causes of the conflict—such as the distribution of mineral wealth and the political dynamics between the DRC and Rwanda—the peace deal may only serve as a temporary solution (CNN).
Conclusion
The claim that Trump celebrated a historic peace deal is Partially True. While a peace agreement has indeed been signed, the assertion that it will end nearly 30 years of conflict is overly optimistic given the complexities of the situation and the lack of commitment from all parties involved. The deal may represent a step toward peace, but significant challenges remain that could undermine its effectiveness.
