Fact Check: Trump can now revoke citizenship case-by-case, state-by-state.

Fact Check: "Trump can now revoke citizenship case-by-case, state-by-state."

What We Know

The claim that "Trump can now revoke citizenship case-by-case, state-by-state" suggests a significant shift in the authority of the U.S. presidency regarding citizenship revocation. As of now, the U.S. Constitution and federal law govern citizenship, primarily through the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Under this law, citizenship can only be revoked under specific circumstances, such as fraud during the naturalization process or certain criminal convictions. The process is typically federal, not state-based, and requires a legal proceeding rather than unilateral action by the president.

There have been discussions and proposals regarding the revocation of citizenship, particularly concerning individuals involved in terrorism or other serious crimes. However, these discussions have not resulted in any formal policy changes that would allow for case-by-case revocation at the discretion of the president or state authorities (source-1, source-2).

Analysis

The assertion that Trump can revoke citizenship on a case-by-case basis is misleading. While the president has significant influence over immigration policy, any action to revoke citizenship would still need to adhere to existing laws and judicial processes. The INA does not grant the president the authority to revoke citizenship unilaterally or state-by-state; such actions would likely face legal challenges.

Moreover, the sources available do not provide any evidence that supports the claim. They primarily discuss Trump's political maneuvers and opinions rather than any concrete changes to citizenship laws or policies (source-1, source-2, source-3). The lack of credible information from reliable sources indicates that this claim may stem from misinterpretations or exaggerations of Trump's statements or intentions.

Conclusion

Needs Research: The claim that Trump can revoke citizenship case-by-case and state-by-state lacks substantiation and contradicts established legal frameworks governing citizenship in the United States. While there may be ongoing discussions about citizenship and immigration policy, no credible evidence supports the assertion that such unilateral authority exists for the president. Further research and reliable sources are needed to clarify the current legal standing on this issue.

Sources

1. Qui est Massad Boulos, ce libanais conseiller de TRUMP
2. Pourquoi la fureur de Trump et Vance contre Zelensky
3. Pourquoi ce chapeau de Melania Trump
4. Trump ; Je classe déjà l’UE comme un pays du tiers monde
5. JForum.fr ; une information juive sur Israël, le monde Juif, la Torah ...
6. Le terrible risque pris par Elon Musk suite à ses attaques contre ...
7. Trump stoppt Einreise von ausländischen Harvard-Studierenden
8. USA: US-Psychiater und Psychologen warnen vor Trump