Fact Check: Trump approved attack plans on Iran but hasn't decided to strike.

Published June 19, 2025

•By

VERDICT

Partially True

# Fact Check: "Trump approved attack plans on Iran but hasn't decided to strike." ## What We Know Recent reports indicate that President Donald Trump...

Fact Check: "Trump approved attack plans on Iran but hasn't decided to strike."

What We Know

Recent reports indicate that President Donald Trump has indeed approved military attack plans against Iran but has not yet made a final decision to execute these plans. According to a report from Reuters, Trump informed senior aides that he had approved these plans but was holding off on issuing the final order. This aligns with statements made by Trump himself, where he expressed uncertainty about his next steps, stating, “I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I’m going to do” (New York Times).

Furthermore, sources from CBS News confirm that while Trump has greenlighted attack plans, he is waiting to see if Iran will de-escalate the situation before making a definitive decision. This reflects a cautious approach, as Trump is reportedly wary of becoming entangled in a prolonged conflict, a sentiment echoed in multiple reports (CNN, NBC News).

Analysis

The claim that Trump approved attack plans on Iran but has not decided to strike is supported by multiple credible sources. The reports from Reuters and CBS News are particularly noteworthy as they provide direct insights from senior aides and official statements from Trump. These sources are generally reliable, as they are established news organizations with a history of covering political and military affairs accurately.

However, the context of Trump's decision-making process is crucial. His statements suggest a level of indecision and a desire to keep options open, which could imply that while plans are in place, the likelihood of immediate action is uncertain. The reports also highlight the geopolitical complexities at play, including pressures from Israel and warnings from Iranian leadership about the consequences of U.S. military action (New York Times, Al Jazeera).

While the information is largely consistent across sources, it is essential to consider the potential for bias. For instance, reports from outlets like Al Jazeera may have a different editorial perspective compared to U.S.-based outlets, which could influence the framing of the situation.

Conclusion

The claim that "Trump approved attack plans on Iran but hasn't decided to strike" is Partially True. While it is accurate that Trump has approved military plans, his indecision regarding immediate action reflects a more nuanced situation than the claim suggests. The approval of plans does not equate to an imminent strike, and Trump's cautious approach indicates he is weighing multiple factors before making a final decision.

Sources

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:

"Coffee helps you live longer"

✓100% Free

✓No Registration

✓Instant Results