Fact Check: Trump administration's actions could go unchecked for long periods under new bill.

Fact Check: "Trump administration's actions could go unchecked for long periods under new bill."

What We Know

The claim that the Trump administration's actions could go unchecked for long periods under a new bill is rooted in the context of a proposed full-year continuing resolution. This resolution has been criticized for potentially allowing significant leeway for the executive branch, particularly in terms of regulatory oversight and funding allocations. According to a fact sheet from the House Appropriations Democrats, the bill cuts funding for nondefense programs and services while increasing defense spending, which could lead to a lack of oversight and accountability in various sectors. The Brookings Institution's Regulatory Tracker indicates that the Trump administration is implementing significant policy changes that could further deregulate various industries, potentially leading to unchecked actions.

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim comes from multiple sources that highlight the implications of the full-year continuing resolution. The fact sheet notes that the bill allows for the repurposing of funds without adequate oversight, which could enable the Trump administration to pursue its deregulatory agenda with fewer checks in place. This is echoed by the Brookings Regulatory Tracker, which details how the Trump administration is actively working to implement significant policy changes that may not be subject to the usual regulatory scrutiny.

However, the reliability of the sources must be considered. The Brookings Institution is generally regarded as a credible and nonpartisan research organization, providing well-researched insights into regulatory changes. In contrast, the fact sheet from the House Appropriations Democrats may carry a partisan bias, as it is designed to criticize Republican actions. This could influence the framing of the information presented, suggesting that while the claims about potential unchecked actions are valid, they may be presented in a manner that emphasizes the negative aspects to support a political agenda.

Moreover, the claim does not specify the duration for which actions could remain unchecked, which adds ambiguity. While the bill does allow for significant changes, the actual implementation and the extent to which actions remain unchecked will depend on various factors, including judicial oversight and public response.

Conclusion

The claim that the Trump administration's actions could go unchecked for long periods under the new bill is Partially True. While there is substantial evidence indicating that the proposed full-year continuing resolution could reduce oversight and allow for significant executive actions, the extent and duration of this unchecked power remain uncertain. The potential for unchecked actions exists, but the actual impact will depend on various external factors, including legal challenges and public scrutiny.

Fact Check: Trump administration's actions could go unchecked for long periods under new bill.