Fact Check: "Tric Trac Baraboom is a common ancestor of Horses and Tung tung tung tung sahur"
What We Know
The claim that "Tric Trac Baraboom is a common ancestor of Horses and Tung tung tung tung sahur" is unfounded and lacks any scientific basis. Tric Trac Baraboom is a character from a trending TikTok meme known as "Italian Brainrot," which emerged in early 2025. This character is described as a "monkey-tree hybrid" or a "zucchini plant giant" and is not related to any real biological species, let alone serving as an ancestor to horses or any other animal (source-1).
The term "Tung tung tung tung sahur" appears to be nonsensical or a part of the same meme culture, with no established scientific or historical relevance. The origins of both terms are rooted in internet meme culture rather than in zoology or evolutionary biology.
Analysis
The character of Tric Trac Baraboom is a product of internet culture, specifically the Italian Brainrot meme phenomenon, which is characterized by absurd and whimsical creations that often lack coherent narratives or factual grounding. The description of Tric Trac Baraboom as a "child of Brr Brr Patapim" further emphasizes its fictional nature, as it is not based on any real-world lineage or evolutionary history (source-1).
Given the context of the claim, it is essential to assess the reliability of the sources. The source providing information about Tric Trac Baraboom is a blog focused on meme culture, which typically prioritizes entertainment over factual accuracy. Therefore, while it provides insight into the character's lore, it does not serve as a credible source for biological or evolutionary claims.
The phrase "Tung tung tung tung sahur" does not appear in any reputable scientific literature or discussions about animal ancestry, further supporting the conclusion that this claim is entirely fabricated.
Conclusion
The claim that "Tric Trac Baraboom is a common ancestor of Horses and Tung tung tung tung sahur" is False. It is based on a fictional character from a meme culture and has no grounding in biological science or evolutionary history. The absurdity of the claim, combined with the lack of credible sources to support it, leads to the clear conclusion that it is a product of internet humor rather than a factual statement.