Fact Check: Trial lasted nearly three and a half years before reaching a verdict.

Fact Check: Trial lasted nearly three and a half years before reaching a verdict.

Published June 18, 2025
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Trial lasted nearly three and a half years before reaching a verdict." ## What We Know The claim that a trial lasted nearly three and ...

Fact Check: "Trial lasted nearly three and a half years before reaching a verdict."

What We Know

The claim that a trial lasted nearly three and a half years before reaching a verdict requires scrutiny. According to a fact sheet from New York University, the average duration of civil cases in federal court is approximately 771 days, which translates to about 2.1 years. Court trials can take longer, with some cases exceeding this average duration. However, specific cases can vary significantly based on numerous factors including complexity, the number of witnesses, and legal motions filed.

In a broader context, a study on the trajectory of civil cases in federal court indicates that court trial dispositions had the highest average duration at 831 days, or over two years (Above the Law). This suggests that while lengthy trials do occur, the claim of a trial lasting three and a half years is on the higher end of the spectrum.

Analysis

Evaluating the claim involves assessing the reliability of the sources and the context of trial durations. The data from the New York University fact sheet and the study from Above the Law provide a general overview of trial durations but do not specifically confirm or deny the three and a half year duration for any particular case.

The source from Georgetown Law mentions the procedural aspects of trials but does not provide specific timelines for verdicts (Georgetown Law). This indicates that while lengthy trials are possible, the claim lacks direct evidence from reliable sources that confirm a specific trial lasting three and a half years.

Moreover, the variability in trial lengths can be influenced by numerous factors, including the nature of the case, the jurisdiction, and the strategies employed by the legal teams involved. For instance, complex cases with extensive evidence and numerous witnesses are more likely to extend beyond average durations (Expertise.com).

Given the lack of direct evidence supporting the claim and the general averages provided by credible sources, the assertion that a trial lasted nearly three and a half years remains unverified.

Conclusion

Needs Research: The claim that a trial lasted nearly three and a half years before reaching a verdict is not substantiated by the available evidence. While lengthy trials do occur, the specifics of this claim require further investigation to determine its accuracy. The average durations provided by credible sources suggest that while possible, such lengthy trials are not the norm and lack specific corroboration in this instance.

Sources

  1. PDF Grounded On Newly Discovered Evidence - Georgetown Law
  2. PDF FACT SHEET: Limiting Length of Trials - New York University
  3. The Trajectory Of Civil Cases In Federal Court - Above the Law
  4. Can you predict a verdict based on length of jury deliberations?
  5. How Long Do Criminal Trials Last? | Expertise.com
  6. Federal Sentencing
  7. How Long Does Court Last? A Breakdown of Court Sessions and Trials
  8. Karen Read jurors end deliberations for day after questions

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  Annie Farmer (Maria's sister) She was 16 when Epstein flew her to New . She says Ghislaine watched as Epstein massaged her, groped her, and crawled into her bed. Annie told her parents. They told the FBI. Nothing happened. She later became the only victim to testify under her real name at Maxwell's trial. Her bravery is why we know what we know.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Annie Farmer (Maria's sister) She was 16 when Epstein flew her to New . She says Ghislaine watched as Epstein massaged her, groped her, and crawled into her bed. Annie told her parents. They told the FBI. Nothing happened. She later became the only victim to testify under her real name at Maxwell's trial. Her bravery is why we know what we know.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Annie Farmer (Maria's sister) She was 16 when Epstein flew her to New . She says Ghislaine watched as Epstein massaged her, groped her, and crawled into her bed. Annie told her parents. They told the FBI. Nothing happened. She later became the only victim to testify under her real name at Maxwell's trial. Her bravery is why we know what we know.

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
Don't ever forget every news
media outlet was telling you if
you was unvaccinated in 2021 to
go ahead pick your barrier plot
get you a good ass casket and
set your suit up. Cuz you
going todie. Not going to
you're not going to get COVID
if you have these vaccinations.
His drug maker Pfizer just
announcing the results of its
vaccine trial for adolescents.
It says its coronavirus shot
was 1 00 percent effective at
preventing infection and
sickness among 12 to 15 year
00:30
olds. That's what the fucking
message was in twenty twenty-1.
Never forget that shit. Now in
2025 they say COVID vaccine
heart risk warning. Update
issues by FDA. I guess it's
time to stop listening to these
stupid motherfuckers. They
obviously don't know what the
fuck they talking about.
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Don't ever forget every news media outlet was telling you if you was unvaccinated in 2021 to go ahead pick your barrier plot get you a good ass casket and set your suit up. Cuz you going todie. Not going to you're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. His drug maker Pfizer just announcing the results of its vaccine trial for adolescents. It says its coronavirus shot was 1 00 percent effective at preventing infection and sickness among 12 to 15 year 00:30 olds. That's what the fucking message was in twenty twenty-1. Never forget that shit. Now in 2025 they say COVID vaccine heart risk warning. Update issues by FDA. I guess it's time to stop listening to these stupid motherfuckers. They obviously don't know what the fuck they talking about.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Don't ever forget every news media outlet was telling you if you was unvaccinated in 2021 to go ahead pick your barrier plot get you a good ass casket and set your suit up. Cuz you going todie. Not going to you're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. His drug maker Pfizer just announcing the results of its vaccine trial for adolescents. It says its coronavirus shot was 1 00 percent effective at preventing infection and sickness among 12 to 15 year 00:30 olds. That's what the fucking message was in twenty twenty-1. Never forget that shit. Now in 2025 they say COVID vaccine heart risk warning. Update issues by FDA. I guess it's time to stop listening to these stupid motherfuckers. They obviously don't know what the fuck they talking about.

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein introduced 14-year-old victim to Donald Trump at Mar-a Mar-a-Lago, Ghislaine Maxwell trial testimony reveals
Partially True

Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein introduced 14-year-old victim to Donald Trump at Mar-a Mar-a-Lago, Ghislaine Maxwell trial testimony reveals

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jeffrey Epstein introduced 14-year-old victim to Donald Trump at Mar-a Mar-a-Lago, Ghislaine Maxwell trial testimony reveals

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Ken Paxton's adultery was a focal point of his impeachment trial.
True

Fact Check: Ken Paxton's adultery was a focal point of his impeachment trial.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ken Paxton's adultery was a focal point of his impeachment trial.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trial lasted nearly three and a half years before reaching a verdict. | TruthOrFake Blog