TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Three out of five CRS projects in Sudan canceled due to funding cuts.

Fact Check: Three out of five CRS projects in Sudan canceled due to funding cuts.

Published June 28, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Three out of five CRS projects in Sudan canceled due to funding cuts." ## What We Know The claim that "three out of five CRS projects ...

Fact Check: "Three out of five CRS projects in Sudan canceled due to funding cuts."

What We Know

The claim that "three out of five CRS projects in Sudan" have been canceled due to funding cuts is supported by reports indicating significant reductions in funding for humanitarian projects in the region. Specifically, a report from NCR Online states that three out of five Catholic Relief Services (CRS) projects in Sudan, which focus on health, livelihood, and food security, have been affected, impacting over 600,000 people. This aligns with the broader context of funding cuts affecting various humanitarian organizations, including CRS, as a result of changes in U.S. foreign aid policy.

Additionally, the humanitarian crisis in Sudan is worsening, with reports indicating that over 30.4 million people, or 64% of the population, are in need of assistance due to ongoing conflict and funding reductions (Care.org). This context highlights the severe impact of funding cuts on humanitarian efforts in Sudan.

Analysis

The reliability of the sources supporting this claim varies. The report from NCR Online is credible, as it discusses the implications of U.S. aid cuts on CRS projects directly, providing specific figures and context. However, it is essential to note that while the claim about the cancellation of projects is substantiated, the precise reasons for these cancellations—whether solely due to funding cuts or other factors—are not fully explored in the available sources.

Moreover, the broader context provided by Care.org and other reports indicates that the humanitarian situation in Sudan is dire, with many organizations facing significant funding challenges. However, these sources do not specifically confirm the exact proportions of project cancellations attributed to funding cuts, leaving some ambiguity regarding the claim's accuracy.

The potential bias in the reporting should also be considered. Sources like NCR Online may have a particular focus on the implications of U.S. policy on faith-based organizations, which could influence the framing of the narrative. Therefore, while the claim has some basis in fact, the lack of comprehensive data on the reasons behind the project cancellations necessitates caution.

Conclusion

Needs Research: While there is evidence supporting the claim that three out of five CRS projects in Sudan have been canceled due to funding cuts, the context and reasons for these cancellations require further investigation. The available sources provide a partial picture but do not fully clarify the extent to which funding cuts are the sole reason for the project cancellations. More detailed and comprehensive data would be needed to definitively validate or refute the claim.

Sources

  1. trilogy vs a group of two, four, ... books, movies, etc
  2. Trump's aid cuts cause thousands of deaths around the world
  3. 3-year v. 3 years' experience | WordReference Forums
  4. 4 in 5 USAID projects now canceled, with State Department ...
  5. 两周年之际，民航局通报「3·21」东航 MU5735 航空器 ...
  6. Sudan's humanitarian crisis worsens amid conflict and ...
  7. Telling the Time (0 = 'oh') - WordReference Forums
  8. Sudan Enters Third Year of Conflict Amid Mass ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Are Trump's approval ratings in the tank? Let's check it out. I mean every politician would like this number here especially to see it go up. How about compared to other presidents who are Republicans? Yeah. It's history making. It's history making. What are we talking about here? So why don't we look back? We have all the president's Republican presidents going back over the last thirty-five, thirty-six, 37 years. What are we talking about? GOP who strongly approved 5 months in. Look at this. George, HW Bush, Bush forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three, fifty you see Trump the first 00:31 term 53, but look at this 63% he beats all the other Republicans on the board here and I was looking even back since Reagan and get this Donald Trump beats Ronald Reagan when it comes to the strongly approved five months and of course Reagan was coming off that high after that assassination attempt so the bottom line is Donald Trump is making history with the Republican base he is more beloved by this Republican base than any Republican base loved any GOP president 5 months in. It is history making. Even CNN 01:03 is telling the truth. Feels like hell might be freezing over.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Are Trump's approval ratings in the tank? Let's check it out. I mean every politician would like this number here especially to see it go up. How about compared to other presidents who are Republicans? Yeah. It's history making. It's history making. What are we talking about here? So why don't we look back? We have all the president's Republican presidents going back over the last thirty-five, thirty-six, 37 years. What are we talking about? GOP who strongly approved 5 months in. Look at this. George, HW Bush, Bush forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three, fifty you see Trump the first 00:31 term 53, but look at this 63% he beats all the other Republicans on the board here and I was looking even back since Reagan and get this Donald Trump beats Ronald Reagan when it comes to the strongly approved five months and of course Reagan was coming off that high after that assassination attempt so the bottom line is Donald Trump is making history with the Republican base he is more beloved by this Republican base than any Republican base loved any GOP president 5 months in. It is history making. Even CNN 01:03 is telling the truth. Feels like hell might be freezing over.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Are Trump's approval ratings in the tank? Let's check it out. I mean every politician would like this number here especially to see it go up. How about compared to other presidents who are Republicans? Yeah. It's history making. It's history making. What are we talking about here? So why don't we look back? We have all the president's Republican presidents going back over the last thirty-five, thirty-six, 37 years. What are we talking about? GOP who strongly approved 5 months in. Look at this. George, HW Bush, Bush forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three, fifty you see Trump the first 00:31 term 53, but look at this 63% he beats all the other Republicans on the board here and I was looking even back since Reagan and get this Donald Trump beats Ronald Reagan when it comes to the strongly approved five months and of course Reagan was coming off that high after that assassination attempt so the bottom line is Donald Trump is making history with the Republican base he is more beloved by this Republican base than any Republican base loved any GOP president 5 months in. It is history making. Even CNN 01:03 is telling the truth. Feels like hell might be freezing over.

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: On July 10, ICE agents raided two marijuana farms in Carpinteria and Camarillo in the sanctuary state of California. Agents found at least 14 migrant children at the sites, believed to have been labor trafficked, and more than 360 illegal aliens — including those convicted of rape, child molestation, and kidnapping, among other crimes. Among the hundreds of illegal aliens arrested in the raid were: Santos Alberto Rodriguez-Jacinto of El Salvador, arrested in El Salvador in 2006 and 2011 for terroristic threats Josefina Lopez-Martinez of Mexico, previously deported in 1998 and convicted in 2023 of willful cruelty to a child in California Jorge Luis Anaya-Garcia of Mexico, previously arrested in California for possession with intent to sell narcotics Jose Vasquez-Lopez of Mexico, previously deported five times from the U.S. and convicted of battery in Florida Fabian Fernando Antonio-Martinez of Mexico, twice granted voluntary return and was arrested in February 2021 in California for felony possession of a firearm Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez of Mexico, previously arrested for indecent exposure and granted voluntary return three times Miguel Mejia-Echevearia of El Salvador, arrested for hit-and-run with property damage Christina Martinez-Modesto of Mexico, arrested for misdemeanor assault and battery of her spouse Cinthia Paola Cardona-Mendoza of Mexico, arrested for assault with a deadly weapon Adriana Gonzalez-Gonzalez of Mexico, convicted three times for burglary and drunk driving
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: On July 10, ICE agents raided two marijuana farms in Carpinteria and Camarillo in the sanctuary state of California. Agents found at least 14 migrant children at the sites, believed to have been labor trafficked, and more than 360 illegal aliens — including those convicted of rape, child molestation, and kidnapping, among other crimes. Among the hundreds of illegal aliens arrested in the raid were: Santos Alberto Rodriguez-Jacinto of El Salvador, arrested in El Salvador in 2006 and 2011 for terroristic threats Josefina Lopez-Martinez of Mexico, previously deported in 1998 and convicted in 2023 of willful cruelty to a child in California Jorge Luis Anaya-Garcia of Mexico, previously arrested in California for possession with intent to sell narcotics Jose Vasquez-Lopez of Mexico, previously deported five times from the U.S. and convicted of battery in Florida Fabian Fernando Antonio-Martinez of Mexico, twice granted voluntary return and was arrested in February 2021 in California for felony possession of a firearm Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez of Mexico, previously arrested for indecent exposure and granted voluntary return three times Miguel Mejia-Echevearia of El Salvador, arrested for hit-and-run with property damage Christina Martinez-Modesto of Mexico, arrested for misdemeanor assault and battery of her spouse Cinthia Paola Cardona-Mendoza of Mexico, arrested for assault with a deadly weapon Adriana Gonzalez-Gonzalez of Mexico, convicted three times for burglary and drunk driving

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On July 10, ICE agents raided two marijuana farms in Carpinteria and Camarillo in the sanctuary state of California. Agents found at least 14 migrant children at the sites, believed to have been labor trafficked, and more than 360 illegal aliens — including those convicted of rape, child molestation, and kidnapping, among other crimes. Among the hundreds of illegal aliens arrested in the raid were: Santos Alberto Rodriguez-Jacinto of El Salvador, arrested in El Salvador in 2006 and 2011 for terroristic threats Josefina Lopez-Martinez of Mexico, previously deported in 1998 and convicted in 2023 of willful cruelty to a child in California Jorge Luis Anaya-Garcia of Mexico, previously arrested in California for possession with intent to sell narcotics Jose Vasquez-Lopez of Mexico, previously deported five times from the U.S. and convicted of battery in Florida Fabian Fernando Antonio-Martinez of Mexico, twice granted voluntary return and was arrested in February 2021 in California for felony possession of a firearm Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez of Mexico, previously arrested for indecent exposure and granted voluntary return three times Miguel Mejia-Echevearia of El Salvador, arrested for hit-and-run with property damage Christina Martinez-Modesto of Mexico, arrested for misdemeanor assault and battery of her spouse Cinthia Paola Cardona-Mendoza of Mexico, arrested for assault with a deadly weapon Adriana Gonzalez-Gonzalez of Mexico, convicted three times for burglary and drunk driving

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sealand of the Pacific closed in 1992 due of earlier fatal incident surrounding three killer whales in 1991
True

Fact Check: Sealand of the Pacific closed in 1992 due of earlier fatal incident surrounding three killer whales in 1991

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Sealand of the Pacific closed in 1992 due of earlier fatal incident surrounding three killer whales in 1991

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Marineland of Pacific closed in 1992 due of earlier fatal incident surrounding three killer whales
False

Fact Check: Marineland of Pacific closed in 1992 due of earlier fatal incident surrounding three killer whales

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Marineland of Pacific closed in 1992 due of earlier fatal incident surrounding three killer whales

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Social security number issued after 2011 does not verify state inn the first three numbers. So Obama was either a non citizen or he was given a bogus number issued by the CIA. Yale University located in Conn. President and ex bones man Bush was head of CIA.
False

Fact Check: Social security number issued after 2011 does not verify state inn the first three numbers. So Obama was either a non citizen or he was given a bogus number issued by the CIA. Yale University located in Conn. President and ex bones man Bush was head of CIA.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Social security number issued after 2011 does not verify state inn the first three numbers. So Obama was either a non citizen or he was given a bogus number issued by the CIA. Yale University located in Conn. President and ex bones man Bush was head of CIA.

Aug 16, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks