Fact Check: This is the first CO2 storage agreement between two countries.

Fact Check: This is the first CO2 storage agreement between two countries.

Published June 18, 2025
βœ—
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "This is the first CO2 storage agreement between two countries." ## What We Know On April 15, 2025, Switzerland and Norway signed a bil...

Fact Check: "This is the first CO2 storage agreement between two countries."

What We Know

On April 15, 2025, Switzerland and Norway signed a bilateral agreement for the future storage of carbon dioxide (CO2) under the North Sea. This agreement establishes the legal framework for the cross-border transport and storage of CO2, which is a significant step in international climate policy efforts (source-2). The press release from both countries claims that this is the first agreement of its kind between two countries, focusing on carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and cross-border CO2 storage (CCS) (source-2).

However, this claim contradicts previous agreements made between other countries. Notably, Denmark, Flanders, and Belgium entered into a specific arrangement in 2022 that allows for the transportation of CO2 between these countries for permanent geological storage. This arrangement is recognized as the world's first bilateral agreement for such purposes (source-4, source-1).

Analysis

The assertion that the agreement between Switzerland and Norway is the first of its kind is misleading. While it may be the first formal agreement specifically between these two nations, it is not the first international CO2 storage agreement overall. The arrangement between Denmark, Flanders, and Belgium, which was finalized in 2022, is recognized as the first international framework for the transportation and storage of CO2 across borders (source-4, source-1).

The credibility of the sources reporting on the agreement between Switzerland and Norway is strong, as it comes from official government press releases and reputable news outlets. However, the claim made in the press release appears to overlook existing agreements, which raises questions about the thoroughness of the information provided by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment and Norway’s Ministry of Energy (source-2).

Conclusion

Verdict: False. The claim that the agreement between Switzerland and Norway is the first CO2 storage agreement between two countries is inaccurate. It is essential to recognize that Denmark, Flanders, and Belgium had already established a similar agreement in 2022, making the assertion misleading. The context and existing agreements should be acknowledged to provide a complete understanding of international efforts in CO2 storage.

Sources

  1. Pioneering cross-border CO2 storage begins in Danish waters
  2. Switzerland and Norway sign CO2 storage deal
  3. World's first agreement to ship CO2 - Maritime Professionals
  4. World's first agreement to ship CO2 - Maritime Professionals
  5. First CO2 storage in the North Sea
  6. Northern Lights Project Signs World's First Commercial Agreement
  7. World-first agreement made for transport of captured CO2
  8. Carbon, Capture, and Storage: History, Current State, and Obstacles

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

πŸ’‘ Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
βœ“100% Free
βœ“No Registration
βœ“Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Social security number issued after 2011 does not verify state inn the first three numbers. So Obama was either a non citizen or he was given a bogus number issued by the CIA. Yale University located in Conn. President and ex bones man Bush was head of CIA.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Social security number issued after 2011 does not verify state inn the first three numbers. So Obama was either a non citizen or he was given a bogus number issued by the CIA. Yale University located in Conn. President and ex bones man Bush was head of CIA.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Social security number issued after 2011 does not verify state inn the first three numbers. So Obama was either a non citizen or he was given a bogus number issued by the CIA. Yale University located in Conn. President and ex bones man Bush was head of CIA.

Aug 16, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: 	
So now I may expose everything
they love hiding from
customers. First, half of the
security cameras at Walmart are
literally fake. I saw someone
open one up and it was
literally just a plastic shell.
They're just there to scare
you. Alright, they be hiding
this but y'all really can get a
seven hundred dollar Walmart
gift card. If you sign up at
700 WM. com, everyone is
qualified for this and I still
do this every month since I'm a
single mom. Next, if you find
something in Walmart that's
already been open or with
ripped packaging, you can ask
for a discount and we have to
give it to you. Okay now if you
comment Walmart in the comments
00:32
I'll send you a little bonus
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus

Detailed fact-check analysis of: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus

Jul 31, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check:  the President confirmed that First Lady Melania Trump is facing a critical and deeply private health battle
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: the President confirmed that First Lady Melania Trump is facing a critical and deeply private health battle

Detailed fact-check analysis of: the President confirmed that First Lady Melania Trump is facing a critical and deeply private health battle

Jul 31, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: Elon Musk and the U.S. President in Heated Clash After Controversial Encounter With First Lady In a shocking development t
False

Fact Check: Elon Musk and the U.S. President in Heated Clash After Controversial Encounter With First Lady In a shocking development t

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Elon Musk and the U.S. President in Heated Clash After Controversial Encounter With First Lady In a shocking development t

Jul 14, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: β€œThe United States Southern Command included the Falkland Islands as part of Argentine territory for the first time.” https://derechadiario.com.ar/politica/comando-sur-los-estados-unidos-reconocio-las-islas-malvinas-como-argentinas
Partially True

Fact Check: β€œThe United States Southern Command included the Falkland Islands as part of Argentine territory for the first time.” https://derechadiario.com.ar/politica/comando-sur-los-estados-unidos-reconocio-las-islas-malvinas-como-argentinas

Detailed fact-check analysis of: β€œThe United States Southern Command included the Falkland Islands as part of Argentine territory for the first time.” https://derechadiario.com.ar/politica/comando-sur-los-estados-unidos-reconocio-las-islas-malvinas-como-argentinas

Aug 20, 2025
Read more β†’