TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: There are increasing attacks against public service media in recent years

Fact Check: There are increasing attacks against public service media in recent years

Published July 7, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "There are increasing attacks against public service media in recent years" ## What We Know The claim regarding increasing attacks agai...

Fact Check: "There are increasing attacks against public service media in recent years"

What We Know

The claim regarding increasing attacks against public service media can be contextualized through various reports and studies. According to the 2025 Digital News Report, traditional news media are facing significant challenges, including declining engagement and trust, particularly in the United States. This report highlights a shift towards social media and alternative media platforms, which has diminished the influence of institutional journalism.

Moreover, the RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025 indicates that while physical attacks on journalists are a visible concern, economic pressures and disinformation campaigns represent a more insidious threat to press freedom. This suggests that public service media may be increasingly vulnerable to both direct and indirect attacks, including financial instability and the spread of misinformation.

Additionally, the UNESCO report on threats to freedom of the press emphasizes that violence, disinformation, and censorship are significant threats that journalists face globally. The report notes that between 2006 and 2020, over 1,200 media professionals lost their lives, with many cases remaining unsolved, indicating a persistent danger to those in the field.

Analysis

The evidence presented supports the notion that public service media are under increasing threat, but the nature of these threats is multifaceted. The 2025 Digital News Report illustrates a decline in traditional media's ability to connect with audiences, which could be interpreted as a form of attack on the credibility and relevance of public service media. The shift towards social media and alternative platforms has not only fragmented the audience but also created an environment where misinformation can thrive, undermining the authority of traditional journalism.

The RSF World Press Freedom Index and the UNESCO report further corroborate this by highlighting the economic fragility and the rise of disinformation as critical issues facing journalists today. These reports suggest that while there may not be a direct increase in physical attacks on public service media, the overall landscape of threats is evolving, making it more challenging for these institutions to operate effectively.

However, it is essential to consider the reliability of the sources. The Digital News Report is produced by the Reuters Institute, which is generally regarded as a credible source in media studies. The RSF and UNESCO are also reputable organizations focused on press freedom and the safety of journalists, lending further credibility to their findings.

Conclusion

The claim that "there are increasing attacks against public service media in recent years" is Partially True. While there is evidence of increasing challenges and threats to public service media, particularly through economic pressures and misinformation, the nature of these attacks is not solely physical. The evolving media landscape poses significant risks to the credibility and effectiveness of public service media, indicating a complex interplay of factors rather than a straightforward increase in traditional forms of attacks.

Sources

  1. Internet Crime Complaint Center Releases 2022 Statistics - FBI
  2. Homeland Threat Assessment 2025
  3. Overview and key findings of the 2025 Digital News Report
  4. RSF World Press Freedom Index 2025: economic fragility a ...
  5. United States government and cybercrime - statistics & facts
  6. Threats to freedom of press: Violence, disinformation & ...
  7. Five Key Insights Into Americans' Views of the News Media
  8. Threats that silence: Trends in the safety of journalists

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Chris Smalls, who took on Amazon and won, was assaulted by the Israeli military while participating in the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, a peaceful aid mission carrying food, insulin, diapers, and water filters to starved Gaza. Israeli forces intercepted the ship in international waters, cut communications, boarded the boat, physically assaulted Chris with choking and kicking, leaving him bruised and bleeding. The assault was racially motivated, and despite public calls for solidarity, there is silence
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Chris Smalls, who took on Amazon and won, was assaulted by the Israeli military while participating in the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, a peaceful aid mission carrying food, insulin, diapers, and water filters to starved Gaza. Israeli forces intercepted the ship in international waters, cut communications, boarded the boat, physically assaulted Chris with choking and kicking, leaving him bruised and bleeding. The assault was racially motivated, and despite public calls for solidarity, there is silence

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Chris Smalls, who took on Amazon and won, was assaulted by the Israeli military while participating in the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, a peaceful aid mission carrying food, insulin, diapers, and water filters to starved Gaza. Israeli forces intercepted the ship in international waters, cut communications, boarded the boat, physically assaulted Chris with choking and kicking, leaving him bruised and bleeding. The assault was racially motivated, and despite public calls for solidarity, there is silence

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: is there a safe pirated games website =
Partially True

Fact Check: is there a safe pirated games website =

Detailed fact-check analysis of: is there a safe pirated games website =

Aug 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: there are plants that help curb epilepsy
Partially True

Fact Check: there are plants that help curb epilepsy

Detailed fact-check analysis of: there are plants that help curb epilepsy

Aug 19, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: There are About 1.4 million American women on OnlyFans. There are about 10 million women between the age of 18-25 in the US. It can be reasonably inferred that 14% of women 18-25 have only fans accounts.
Partially True

Fact Check: There are About 1.4 million American women on OnlyFans. There are about 10 million women between the age of 18-25 in the US. It can be reasonably inferred that 14% of women 18-25 have only fans accounts.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There are About 1.4 million American women on OnlyFans. There are about 10 million women between the age of 18-25 in the US. It can be reasonably inferred that 14% of women 18-25 have only fans accounts.

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks