Fact Check: The VA revised its internal bylaws to allow healthcare workers to refuse treatment to veterans based on characteristics not explicitly protected by federal law.

Fact Check: The VA revised its internal bylaws to allow healthcare workers to refuse treatment to veterans based on characteristics not explicitly protected by federal law.

Published June 16, 2025
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "The VA revised its internal bylaws to allow healthcare workers to refuse treatment to veterans based on characteristics not explicitly ...

Fact Check: "The VA revised its internal bylaws to allow healthcare workers to refuse treatment to veterans based on characteristics not explicitly protected by federal law."

What We Know

The claim suggests that the Veterans Affairs (VA) has modified its internal bylaws in a way that permits healthcare workers to deny treatment to veterans based on characteristics that are not explicitly protected under federal law. To assess this, we need to examine the relevant policies and directives from the VA.

  1. The VHA Publications indicate that the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has established mandatory policies and procedures that govern the treatment of veterans. These policies are designed to ensure that veterans receive consistent, safe, and high-quality healthcare.

  2. According to the VHA Directive 1100.20(2), there are specific guidelines regarding the provision of healthcare services to veterans, but it does not explicitly mention any changes that would allow healthcare workers to refuse treatment based on non-federally protected characteristics.

  3. The Bylaws and Rules of The Medical Staff outline the operational framework for healthcare delivery within the VA, emphasizing the need for equitable treatment of all veterans. However, there is no clear evidence within these bylaws that indicates a change allowing discrimination based on characteristics not protected by federal law.

  4. The 38 CFR Part 17 regulations affirm that patients receiving care from the VA have the right to accept or refuse any medical treatment. This suggests a framework of patient autonomy rather than a system that allows for selective treatment based on personal characteristics.

Analysis

The claim requires a careful examination of the sources and their context. The primary sources from the VA, including the VHA directives and bylaws, do not provide evidence supporting the assertion that healthcare workers can refuse treatment based on characteristics not protected by federal law.

  • The VHA Publications and VHA Directive 1100.20(2) do not indicate any revisions that would support this claim. They focus on maintaining standards of care and ensuring that veterans receive necessary treatments.

  • The Bylaws and Rules emphasize the importance of providing high-quality healthcare to veterans, which contradicts the notion of allowing discrimination based on unprotected characteristics.

  • Furthermore, the 38 CFR Part 17 reinforces the rights of patients to refuse treatment, which does not imply that healthcare providers can refuse treatment based on arbitrary characteristics.

In conclusion, while the claim raises a significant concern regarding potential discrimination in healthcare, the current available evidence does not substantiate it. The sources reviewed are credible, as they originate from official VA publications and directives, which are designed to uphold the rights and care of veterans.

Conclusion

Needs Research: The claim that the VA has revised its bylaws to allow healthcare workers to refuse treatment to veterans based on characteristics not explicitly protected by federal law is not supported by the available evidence. While the concern is valid, further investigation into any recent changes in VA policy or directives is necessary to clarify the situation. Current sources do not indicate such a revision, and the existing policies emphasize equitable treatment for all veterans.

Sources

  1. VHA Publications - VA.gov | Veterans Affairs
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE 1100.20(2) Veterans Health ...
  3. BYLAWS, RULES, AND REGULATIONS of the MEDICAL ...
  4. LEGAL - Veterans Affairs
  5. VHA DIRECTIVE 1100.21(1) Veterans Health ...
  6. Medical Staff Bylaws Rules and Regulations - Veterans Affairs
  7. 38 CFR Part 17 -- Medical
  8. Bylaws and Rules of The Medical Staff of Veterans Health Administration ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to:

Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it.

Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data.

Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted.

Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men.

Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law.

Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty.

Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling.

Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain."

These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to: Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it. Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data. Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted. Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men. Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law. Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty. Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling. Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain." These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to: Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it. Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data. Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted. Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men. Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law. Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty. Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling. Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain." These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump is angry with the BRICS group:
"We will not allow the dollar to lose its value."
"We received $5.1 trillion in 'investment' from the Gulf, and now $17 billion from Bahrain, and they're all eager to pour more into America!
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump is angry with the BRICS group: "We will not allow the dollar to lose its value." "We received $5.1 trillion in 'investment' from the Gulf, and now $17 billion from Bahrain, and they're all eager to pour more into America!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump is angry with the BRICS group: "We will not allow the dollar to lose its value." "We received $5.1 trillion in 'investment' from the Gulf, and now $17 billion from Bahrain, and they're all eager to pour more into America!

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: California legislators revised state law in 2022 to specify that journalists have the right to be in public spaces during upheaval, even if others must disperse or follow a curfew.
True

Fact Check: California legislators revised state law in 2022 to specify that journalists have the right to be in public spaces during upheaval, even if others must disperse or follow a curfew.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: California legislators revised state law in 2022 to specify that journalists have the right to be in public spaces during upheaval, even if others must disperse or follow a curfew.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Coronavirus is over in 2025 or its not kiling so much peple
Unverified

Fact Check: Coronavirus is over in 2025 or its not kiling so much peple

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Coronavirus is over in 2025 or its not kiling so much peple

Aug 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The UN admits that 87% of its 2,010 food trucks in Gaza between May 19–July 29 were hijacked by armed groups (e.g., Hamas), and this is 'not Israeli propaganda'
Partially True

Fact Check: The UN admits that 87% of its 2,010 food trucks in Gaza between May 19–July 29 were hijacked by armed groups (e.g., Hamas), and this is 'not Israeli propaganda'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The UN admits that 87% of its 2,010 food trucks in Gaza between May 19–July 29 were hijacked by armed groups (e.g., Hamas), and this is 'not Israeli propaganda'

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →