Fact Check: "The US Supreme Court can lift injunctions allowing policies to move forward during litigation."
What We Know
The claim that the US Supreme Court can lift injunctions allowing policies to move forward during litigation is supported by recent developments in case law. On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. CASA, Inc. that lower courts have limited authority to issue nationwide injunctions that block executive actions. This decision effectively allows the federal government to implement policies even while litigation is ongoing, as long as those policies are not universally enjoined by a court (source-1, source-4).
The ruling addressed the issue of "universal injunctions," which are court orders that prevent the government from enforcing a law or policy against anyone, not just the plaintiffs in the case. The Supreme Court's decision restricts this practice, thereby enabling the executive branch to proceed with its policies while litigation is pending (source-3, source-7).
Analysis
The Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. CASA, Inc. is a significant legal development that confirms the Court's authority to limit the scope of injunctions issued by lower courts. By ruling that federal judges cannot issue universal injunctions that block executive policies nationwide, the Court has effectively empowered the executive branch to implement its agenda without being hindered by widespread judicial orders (source-2, source-5).
The sources used in this analysis are credible and come from reputable news outlets and legal analyses. For instance, the New York Times and NPR provide detailed coverage of the Supreme Court's decision and its implications for executive power (source-4, source-3). Additionally, the National Law Review offers a legal perspective on the ramifications of this ruling, further supporting the claim that the Supreme Court can lift injunctions (source-7).
Conclusion
The claim that "the US Supreme Court can lift injunctions allowing policies to move forward during litigation" is True. The Supreme Court's recent ruling in Trump v. CASA, Inc. has established that lower courts cannot issue universal injunctions that prevent the federal government from enforcing its policies. This ruling enhances the executive branch's ability to implement its agenda while litigation is ongoing, thereby affirming the Supreme Court's role in shaping the boundaries of judicial authority over executive actions.
Sources
- 24A884 Trump v. CASA, Inc. (06/27/2025)
- "A BIG WIN": Supreme Court Ends Excessive Nationwide Injunctions
- The Supreme Court has limited universal injunctions. What does it mean ...
- Supreme Court Limits Judges' Ability to Issue Nationwide ...
- How the Supreme Court's Injunction Ruling Expands Trump's Power
- U.S. Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunction Authority
