Fact Check: "The U.S. has seen a 128% increase in ICE's apprehension of immigrants facing criminal charges."
What We Know
The claim regarding a 128% increase in the apprehension of immigrants facing criminal charges by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) lacks direct substantiation in the available data. The Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Report provides insights into ICE's operations, including the Criminal Apprehension Program (CAP), which identifies and arrests noncitizens in custody of other law enforcement agencies. However, specific statistics detailing the percentage increase in apprehensions related to criminal charges are not explicitly mentioned in this report.
Additionally, the ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Statistics dashboard presents trends in arrests, detentions, and removals, but it does not provide a clear breakdown or percentage increase specifically for apprehensions of immigrants with criminal charges.
Analysis
The absence of concrete figures in the cited reports raises questions about the accuracy of the claim. The Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Report and the ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Statistics do not provide a direct comparison or historical data that would allow for the calculation of a 128% increase. This lack of specific data makes it difficult to verify the claim.
Moreover, while the reports do indicate ongoing operations and trends, they do not specify the nature of the apprehensions or provide a year-over-year comparison that would be necessary to substantiate such a significant increase. The claim may stem from a misinterpretation or misrepresentation of the data presented in these reports.
The reliability of the sources is generally high, as they are official reports from ICE and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). However, the absence of specific figures related to the claim diminishes their utility in verifying this particular assertion.
Conclusion
The claim that "The U.S. has seen a 128% increase in ICE's apprehension of immigrants facing criminal charges" is currently Unverified. The lack of specific data in the available sources means that there is no basis to confirm or refute the claim definitively. Without clear statistics or a reliable source directly supporting this figure, it remains unsubstantiated.