Fact Check: The U.S. has a history of immigration enforcement policies.

Fact Check: The U.S. has a history of immigration enforcement policies.

Published July 3, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: The U.S. has a history of immigration enforcement policies ## What We Know The United States has a long and complex history of immigrat...

Fact Check: The U.S. has a history of immigration enforcement policies

What We Know

The United States has a long and complex history of immigration enforcement policies that date back to the late 19th century. The federal government began to take a more active role in regulating immigration with the Immigration Act of 1891, which established the Office of Immigration to oversee the entry of immigrants (Origins of the Federal Immigration Service). This marked the beginning of a series of legislative measures aimed at controlling who could enter the country.

One of the most significant pieces of legislation was the Immigration Act of 1924, also known as the Johnson-Reed Act. This law established a national origins quota system that limited the number of immigrants allowed entry into the U.S. based on their nationality, effectively prioritizing immigrants from Northern and Western Europe while excluding those from Asia entirely (The Immigration Act of 1924). The act was a response to growing nativist sentiments and aimed to preserve the racial composition of the U.S. population.

Prior to the 1924 Act, the Immigration Act of 1917 had already introduced literacy tests and created the "Asiatic Barred Zone," which restricted immigration from certain Asian countries (The Immigration Act of 1924). These early policies laid the groundwork for more restrictive immigration laws in the following decades.

Analysis

The claim that the U.S. has a history of immigration enforcement policies is substantiated by various historical records and analyses. The establishment of the Office of Immigration in 1891 and subsequent acts, such as the 1917 and 1924 Immigration Acts, illustrate a clear trajectory toward more stringent immigration controls (Early American Immigration Policies, The Immigration Act of 1924).

The 1924 Immigration Act is particularly noteworthy as it not only imposed quotas but also reflected the racial and ethnic biases of the time, aiming to maintain a homogenous society (The Immigration Act of 1924). This act was a culmination of earlier restrictive measures and demonstrated a significant shift in U.S. immigration policy towards exclusion rather than inclusion.

The reliability of the sources used in this analysis is generally high. The information from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and historical analyses from reputable organizations provide a well-rounded view of the evolution of immigration policies. However, it is essential to recognize that historical interpretations can vary, and some sources may reflect particular ideological perspectives (History of ICE, A Brief History of U.S. Immigration Policy).

Conclusion

The verdict is True. The United States has a well-documented history of immigration enforcement policies that have evolved over time, characterized by various legislative acts aimed at regulating and restricting immigration based on nationality, race, and other factors. The evidence clearly supports the claim that immigration enforcement has been a significant aspect of U.S. policy since the late 19th century.

Sources

  1. Origins of the Federal Immigration Service
  2. Early American Immigration Policies
  3. The Immigration Act of 1924 (The Johnson-Reed Act)
  4. PDF Overview of INS History - USCIS
  5. History of ICE
  6. A Brief History of U.S. Immigration Policy from the Colonial Period to Present Day
  7. Timeline - Immigration History
  8. How U.S. immigration laws and rules have changed through history

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  ICE just received $45 billion in funding for the next 4 years - more than the U.S. government spent on immigration detention during the Obama, Biden, and first Trump administrations Combined
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: ICE just received $45 billion in funding for the next 4 years - more than the U.S. government spent on immigration detention during the Obama, Biden, and first Trump administrations Combined

Detailed fact-check analysis of: ICE just received $45 billion in funding for the next 4 years - more than the U.S. government spent on immigration detention during the Obama, Biden, and first Trump administrations Combined

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The longest filibuster in U.S. history was 75 days. It took place in 1964, when Democrats tried to block the Civil Rights Act.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The longest filibuster in U.S. history was 75 days. It took place in 1964, when Democrats tried to block the Civil Rights Act.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The longest filibuster in U.S. history was 75 days. It took place in 1964, when Democrats tried to block the Civil Rights Act.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  the lowest number of border crossings in recorded history for June— with zero illegal alien releases into the U.S., compared to over 27,000 in June 2024.
Unverified

Fact Check: the lowest number of border crossings in recorded history for June— with zero illegal alien releases into the U.S., compared to over 27,000 in June 2024.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: the lowest number of border crossings in recorded history for June— with zero illegal alien releases into the U.S., compared to over 27,000 in June 2024.

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Illegal immigration into the U.S. has virtually stopped due to President Trump.
Partially True

Fact Check: Illegal immigration into the U.S. has virtually stopped due to President Trump.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Illegal immigration into the U.S. has virtually stopped due to President Trump.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →