TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: The UN nuclear watchdog concluded this week that Iran was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty.

Fact Check: The UN nuclear watchdog concluded this week that Iran was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty.

Published June 13, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The UN nuclear watchdog concluded this week that Iran was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty." ...

Fact Check: "The UN nuclear watchdog concluded this week that Iran was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty."

What We Know

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), often referred to as the UN nuclear watchdog, has formally declared that Iran is in breach of its nuclear non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. This resolution was adopted by a vote of 19 out of 35 member countries of the IAEA's board of governors, with support from the United States, United Kingdom, France, and Germany (BBC). The resolution cites Iran's "many failures" to provide the IAEA with full answers regarding its undeclared nuclear materials and activities, which constitutes non-compliance with its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) (New York Times).

The IAEA's findings are significant, particularly as they express concern over Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium, which has been enriched to levels near weapons-grade purity (AP News). Iran has responded to the resolution by condemning it as a "political" act and has announced plans to establish a new nuclear enrichment facility (Reuters).

Analysis

The IAEA's declaration is based on a comprehensive assessment of Iran's nuclear activities and its failure to cooperate fully with the agency's investigations. The resolution emphasizes that Iran's lack of transparency regarding undeclared nuclear material raises significant concerns about the peaceful nature of its nuclear program (Washington Post).

The credibility of the IAEA as a source is high, given its established role as an international authority on nuclear non-proliferation and its mandate to monitor compliance with the NPT. The board's decision reflects a consensus among Western nations, while countries like Russia and China opposed the resolution, highlighting geopolitical divisions on this issue (Al Jazeera).

Iran's response, which includes plans for further enrichment activities, indicates a potential escalation of tensions in the region and suggests that the situation may become more complex as negotiations continue (UN News). The political motivations behind the resolution, as claimed by Iran, cannot be entirely dismissed, but the documented failures in compliance provide a factual basis for the IAEA's findings.

Conclusion

The claim that the UN nuclear watchdog concluded that Iran was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty is True. The IAEA's formal declaration, supported by a significant majority of its board members, is grounded in Iran's documented failures to comply with its nuclear obligations. The situation remains fluid, with potential implications for international relations and regional security.

Sources

  1. Watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations - BBC
  2. Iran Is Breaking Rules on Nuclear Activity, U.N. Watchdog Says - New York Times
  3. Iran announces a new nuclear enrichment site after UN watchdog censure - AP News
  4. IAEA board declares Iran in breach of non-proliferation - Reuters
  5. U.N. nuclear watchdog says Iran failed to meet nuclear obligations - Washington Post
  6. Atomic watchdog says Iran not complying with nuclear safeguards - UN News
  7. UN nuclear watchdog board finds Iran not complying with obligations - Al Jazeera

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Nuclear weapons proliferation increases global security risks.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Nuclear weapons proliferation increases global security risks.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Nuclear weapons proliferation increases global security risks.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Tulsa Gabbana testified that Iran was not building a nuclear bomb
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Tulsa Gabbana testified that Iran was not building a nuclear bomb

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Tulsa Gabbana testified that Iran was not building a nuclear bomb

Jul 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Nuclear inspections are critical for global security.
True

Fact Check: Nuclear inspections are critical for global security.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Nuclear inspections are critical for global security.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated
Partially True

Fact Check: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated

Jul 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran. In the process, he sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani, Iran's lead nuclear negotiator."
False

Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran. In the process, he sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani, Iran's lead nuclear negotiator."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran. In the process, he sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani, Iran's lead nuclear negotiator."

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks