Fact Check: The Trump-Russia partnership was a fabrication set loose by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Fact Check: "The Trump-Russia partnership was a fabrication set loose by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton."

What We Know

The claim that the Trump-Russia partnership was a fabrication orchestrated by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton is not supported by credible evidence. Investigations, including the Mueller Report, found substantial links between the Trump campaign and Russian officials during the 2016 presidential election. For instance, members of Trump's campaign had numerous contacts with Russian intelligence officials, and Trump's own business dealings with Russia date back years, including a significant real estate transaction with Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev in 2008 (source-1).

Moreover, the claim that Hillary Clinton and Obama conspired to create a false narrative about Trump and Russia lacks substantiation. The origins of the investigation into Russian interference were based on credible intelligence and not merely a political ploy. The FBI's investigation was initiated after the discovery of Russian attempts to meddle in the election, which were confirmed by multiple intelligence agencies (source-2).

Analysis

The assertion that the Trump-Russia partnership was a fabrication is contradicted by extensive evidence documented in various investigations. The Mueller Report, for example, detailed numerous contacts between Trump associates and Russian officials, concluding that Russia did interfere in the election to benefit Trump's candidacy (source-1).

Conversely, claims suggesting that Obama and Clinton orchestrated a conspiracy to fabricate the Trump-Russia narrative stem from sources that often exhibit partisan bias. For instance, reports from the New York Post regarding CIA reviews have been criticized for lacking rigorous verification and being politically motivated (source-6). Furthermore, the narrative that Clinton "conjured" the Trump-Russia scandal has been widely debunked as part of a broader conspiracy theory that lacks credible evidence (source-7).

In evaluating the reliability of the sources, it is crucial to note that while some sources may present alternative viewpoints, they often do so without the backing of substantial evidence. The majority of reputable investigations, including those by the FBI and the Senate Intelligence Committee, have consistently supported the conclusion that Russian interference was real and that there were significant connections between the Trump campaign and Russian entities.

Conclusion

Verdict: False
The claim that the Trump-Russia partnership was a fabrication set loose by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton is false. It is contradicted by substantial evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election and documented connections between Trump associates and Russian officials. The narrative suggesting a conspiracy to fabricate this partnership lacks credible support and is primarily propagated by sources with known partisan biases.

Fact Check: The Trump-Russia partnership was a fabrication set loose by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.