Fact Check: The trial of Dmitriy Kurashov is the first of its kind in Ukraine, as he is the first person to be brought to trial for the crime of battlefield execution since the full-scale invasion began.

Fact Check: The trial of Dmitriy Kurashov is the first of its kind in Ukraine, as he is the first person to be brought to trial for the crime of battlefield execution since the full-scale invasion began.

Published June 15, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The trial of Dmitriy Kurashov is the first of its kind in Ukraine, as he is the first person to be brought to trial for the crime of ba...

Fact Check: "The trial of Dmitriy Kurashov is the first of its kind in Ukraine, as he is the first person to be brought to trial for the crime of battlefield execution since the full-scale invasion began."

What We Know

Dmitriy Kurashov, a Russian soldier, is currently on trial in Ukraine for the alleged execution of a Ukrainian soldier, Vitalii Hodniuk, during a battlefield encounter in January 2024. This trial is significant as it is reported to be the first instance of a soldier being prosecuted in Ukraine for battlefield execution since the onset of the full-scale invasion by Russia in February 2022. According to Ukrainian authorities, there have been at least 124 documented cases of battlefield executions by Russian forces since the invasion began, but Kurashov is noted as the first individual to face trial for such a crime (BBC, Yahoo).

Analysis

The claim that Kurashov's trial is the first of its kind in Ukraine is supported by multiple credible sources. The BBC, for instance, explicitly states that Kurashov is the first person to be brought to trial for battlefield execution in Ukraine since the full-scale invasion began (BBC). This assertion is corroborated by other outlets, including Radio Free Europe and Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, which also highlight the unprecedented nature of this trial (RFERL, KhPG).

The reliability of these sources is generally high, as they are established news organizations with a track record of reporting on the conflict in Ukraine. They provide detailed accounts of the trial proceedings and the context surrounding Kurashov's actions, which adds to the credibility of the claim. Additionally, the presence of witnesses from Kurashov's own unit testifying against him further underscores the seriousness of the charges and the legal process being followed (BBC, Yahoo).

Conclusion

The claim that Dmitriy Kurashov is the first person to be brought to trial in Ukraine for the crime of battlefield execution since the full-scale invasion began is True. The evidence from multiple reputable sources confirms that this trial is indeed a landmark case in the ongoing conflict, highlighting Ukraine's commitment to prosecuting war crimes.

Sources

  1. Ukraine war crime trial: A Russian soldier takes the stand for an execution
  2. Russian on trial for killing Ukrainian POW with his commander
  3. Exclusive: Russian Soldier On Trial In Ukraine Over Alleged Battlefield Execution
  4. The first trial of its kind: A Russian soldier takes the stand

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?" The Epstein records were sealed by a judge until after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. They weren't unsealed until January 2024. So no, Biden couldn't release what wasn't legally available. Biden didn't run a cult. He He let the DOJ operate independently y-unlike Trump, who demands loyalty oaths and treats every agency like his personal operatives. And no Democrat ran on a platform promising to release the Epstein files. Trump did. Then blocked them.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Ken Paxton's adultery was a focal point of his impeachment trial.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Ken Paxton's adultery was a focal point of his impeachment trial.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ken Paxton's adultery was a focal point of his impeachment trial.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein killed himself while in a Manhattan cell awaiting trial.
True

Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein killed himself while in a Manhattan cell awaiting trial.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jeffrey Epstein killed himself while in a Manhattan cell awaiting trial.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Many news organizations offer trial subscriptions to attract new readers.
True

Fact Check: Many news organizations offer trial subscriptions to attract new readers.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Many news organizations offer trial subscriptions to attract new readers.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  Annie Farmer (Maria's sister) She was 16 when Epstein flew her to New . She says Ghislaine watched as Epstein massaged her, groped her, and crawled into her bed. Annie told her parents. They told the FBI. Nothing happened. She later became the only victim to testify under her real name at Maxwell's trial. Her bravery is why we know what we know.
Partially True

Fact Check: Annie Farmer (Maria's sister) She was 16 when Epstein flew her to New . She says Ghislaine watched as Epstein massaged her, groped her, and crawled into her bed. Annie told her parents. They told the FBI. Nothing happened. She later became the only victim to testify under her real name at Maxwell's trial. Her bravery is why we know what we know.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Annie Farmer (Maria's sister) She was 16 when Epstein flew her to New . She says Ghislaine watched as Epstein massaged her, groped her, and crawled into her bed. Annie told her parents. They told the FBI. Nothing happened. She later became the only victim to testify under her real name at Maxwell's trial. Her bravery is why we know what we know.

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The trial of Dmitriy Kurashov is the first of its kind in Ukraine, as he is the first person to be brought to trial for the crime of battlefield execution since the full-scale invasion began. | TruthOrFake Blog