Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court stated that the assets linked to Viktor Yanukovych cannot be withdrawn before a decision is made on their confiscation.

Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court stated that the assets linked to Viktor Yanukovych cannot be withdrawn before a decision is made on their confiscation.

June 14, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The Swiss Federal Supreme Court stated that the assets linked to Viktor Yanukovych cannot be withdrawn before a decision is made on the...

Fact Check: "The Swiss Federal Supreme Court stated that the assets linked to Viktor Yanukovych cannot be withdrawn before a decision is made on their confiscation."

What We Know

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court recently upheld the freezing of assets linked to Viktor Yanukovych, the former president of Ukraine. According to reports, the court's decision confirmed that these assets cannot be released until a final decision regarding their confiscation is made (Swissinfo, Mezha). The Swiss Federal Council had initiated these asset freezes in response to concerns about illicitly acquired assets linked to politically exposed persons in Ukraine, particularly following Yanukovych's ousting in 2014 (Reuters, STEP).

Analysis

The claim that the Swiss Federal Supreme Court stated that the assets linked to Viktor Yanukovych cannot be withdrawn before a decision on their confiscation is supported by multiple credible sources. The court's ruling, as reported by Swissinfo and Mezha, explicitly states that the assets will remain frozen pending the outcome of the confiscation proceedings. This aligns with Switzerland's legal framework regarding the handling of assets linked to foreign politicians accused of corruption or other illicit activities.

The reliability of these sources is high, as they are established news outlets with a history of accurate reporting. The information provided by Reuters and STEP corroborates the court's decision and the legal context surrounding the asset freezes. Furthermore, the Swiss Federal Council's actions are consistent with international norms regarding the treatment of assets linked to corruption.

Conclusion

The claim that the Swiss Federal Supreme Court stated that the assets linked to Viktor Yanukovych cannot be withdrawn before a decision is made on their confiscation is True. The court's ruling is clear and supported by multiple credible sources, confirming that the assets will remain frozen until the confiscation process is resolved.

Sources

  1. Swiss seek to confiscate $140 million linked to ex-Ukraine President Yanukovych
  2. Swiss court rejects appeal to release funds linked to former Ukraine regime
  3. Swiss government prepares to confiscate frozen assets of former Ukrainian president Yanukovych
  4. Switzerland Maintains Asset Freeze on Fugitive Ukrainian Ex-President Yanukovych
  5. Federal Supreme Court: Account freezes on Ukraine ordered by the federal council remain in place
  6. Over CHF 130 million from entourage of former Ukrainian president Yanukovych
  7. Swiss move to confiscate assets of ally of ex-Ukrainian leader
  8. Swiss Court Rejects Appeal To Release Funds Linked To Former Ukraine Regime

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court rejected three appeals to release funds linked to former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych on July 27, 2024.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court rejected three appeals to release funds linked to former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych on July 27, 2024.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court rejected three appeals to release funds linked to former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych on July 27, 2024.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Council ordered the blocking of assets linked to politically exposed persons from Ukraine in 2022 and 2023.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Council ordered the blocking of assets linked to politically exposed persons from Ukraine in 2022 and 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Swiss Federal Council ordered the blocking of assets linked to politically exposed persons from Ukraine in 2022 and 2023.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The five former Memphis officers involved in Tyre Nichols' death were indicted in federal court in September 2023.
True

Fact Check: The five former Memphis officers involved in Tyre Nichols' death were indicted in federal court in September 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The five former Memphis officers involved in Tyre Nichols' death were indicted in federal court in September 2023.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: On June 14, 2025, a federal judge ordered President Trump to end his unilateral deployment of the National Guard in California, but an appeals court temporarily preserved his ability to do so.
True

Fact Check: On June 14, 2025, a federal judge ordered President Trump to end his unilateral deployment of the National Guard in California, but an appeals court temporarily preserved his ability to do so.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On June 14, 2025, a federal judge ordered President Trump to end his unilateral deployment of the National Guard in California, but an appeals court temporarily preserved his ability to do so.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: California Governor Gavin Newsom stated that President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and deploy troops to Los Angeles was an escalation that threatened democracy.
True

Fact Check: California Governor Gavin Newsom stated that President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and deploy troops to Los Angeles was an escalation that threatened democracy.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: California Governor Gavin Newsom stated that President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and deploy troops to Los Angeles was an escalation that threatened democracy.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court stated that the assets linked to Viktor Yanukovych cannot be withdrawn before a decision is made on their confiscation. | TruthOrFake Blog