Fact Check: The Swedish cartridge 8x63 mm was created due to Sweden's lack of anti-tank guns.

Fact Check: The Swedish cartridge 8x63 mm was created due to Sweden's lack of anti-tank guns.

Published March 26, 2025
by TruthOrFake
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# The Claim: "The Swedish cartridge 8x63 mm was created due to Sweden's lack of anti-tank guns." ## 1. Introduction The claim suggests that the 8x63 ...

The Claim: "The Swedish cartridge 8x63 mm was created due to Sweden's lack of anti-tank guns."

1. Introduction

The claim suggests that the 8x63 mm cartridge, known as the patron m/32, was developed in response to Sweden's deficiency in anti-tank weaponry. This assertion implies a direct correlation between military needs and the development of specific ammunition. To evaluate this claim, we will explore the historical context of the 8x63 mm cartridge, its intended uses, and the state of Sweden's military capabilities during the time of its introduction.

2. What We Know

The 8x63 mm patron m/32 was introduced in 1932 primarily for use in Swedish heavy and medium machine guns, such as the Kulspruta m/39 17. This cartridge was designed to fit in the Browning machine gun platform, which was already in use by the Swedish military. The 8x63 mm cartridge is characterized by its bottlenecked design and was intended for combat situations rather than training 4.

Historically, Sweden faced significant military challenges in the interwar period, particularly as tensions rose in Europe. The country did not possess a dedicated anti-tank gun until the late 1930s, relying instead on other forms of weaponry, including machine guns that could potentially serve in an anti-tank role 3. The Kulspruta m/39, which utilized the 8x63 mm cartridge, was versatile and could be adapted for various combat scenarios, including anti-aircraft operations 2.

3. Analysis

The claim that the 8x63 mm cartridge was created specifically due to a lack of anti-tank guns requires careful scrutiny. While it is true that Sweden did not have dedicated anti-tank guns at the time, the development of the 8x63 mm cartridge appears to be more closely related to the need for a powerful round for machine guns rather than a direct response to anti-tank deficiencies.

  1. Source Reliability:

    • The Wikipedia entry on the 8x63 mm patron m/32 provides a broad overview of the cartridge's specifications and historical context but may lack comprehensive citations and expert verification, which can lead to potential biases or inaccuracies 1.
    • The Kulspruta m/39 article also offers insights into the military applications of the cartridge but does not explicitly link its creation to anti-tank needs 2.
    • Gotavapen.se, a site dedicated to Swedish firearms history, discusses the military's procurement strategies and the use of various rifles, including the K98k, but does not provide a definitive connection between the cartridge and anti-tank capabilities 3.
  2. Conflicting Information:

    • Some sources suggest that the 8x63 mm cartridge was primarily developed for machine guns and not specifically for anti-tank purposes 57. This indicates that while the cartridge could be used in an anti-tank role, its primary design intention was not for that purpose.
    • Other discussions, such as those found in forums, mention that Sweden's military strategy included adapting existing weaponry for various roles, which complicates the narrative that the cartridge was solely a response to a lack of anti-tank guns 68.
  3. Methodological Concerns:

    • The claim lacks specific historical documentation or military records that directly link the development of the 8x63 mm cartridge to the absence of anti-tank guns. Additional primary sources, such as military archives or official documents from the Swedish military, would be beneficial to substantiate or refute this claim.

4. Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The assertion that the 8x63 mm cartridge was created due to Sweden's lack of anti-tank guns is partially true. Evidence indicates that while Sweden did not have dedicated anti-tank guns at the time of the cartridge's introduction, the primary purpose of the 8x63 mm was for use in machine guns rather than as a direct response to anti-tank deficiencies. The cartridge's design was influenced by the need for a powerful round suitable for various combat scenarios, including potential anti-tank applications.

However, the lack of definitive historical documentation linking the cartridge's development specifically to anti-tank needs introduces uncertainty. The available sources do not provide a clear consensus, and the narrative is complicated by Sweden's military strategy of adapting existing weaponry for multiple roles.

Readers should remain cautious and critically evaluate information regarding military history, as interpretations can vary based on the sources consulted and the context in which claims are made.

5. Sources

  1. 8×63mm patron m/32 - Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8%C3%9763mm_patron_m/32
  2. Kulspruta m/39 - Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kulspruta_m/39
  3. Swedish rifles - Gev m/39 and m/40 - gotavapen.se. Retrieved from http://gotavapen.se/gota/artiklar/rifles_se/gev39_40.htm
  4. The Swedish Military Ammunition Site - amkat.se. Retrieved from https://www.amkat.se/index.php?Env=Ammo&Menu_A=30&Menu_B=110&Menu_C=10&Menu_Value_A=8x63&Menu_Value_B=Ball&Menu_Name=Ball
  5. 8×63mm patron m/32 | Military Wiki | Fandom. Retrieved from https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/8%C3%9763mm_patron_m/32
  6. A rare Swedish 98K in 8x63 - Gunboards Forums. Retrieved from https://www.gunboards.com/threads/a-rare-swedish-98k-in-8x63.1245270/
  7. 8 x 63 : [S] ; 8 mm Swedish M1932 - Imperial War Museums. Retrieved from https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30026381
  8. 8X63 Swedish? - Gunboards Forums. Retrieved from https://www.gunboards.com/threads/8x63-swedish.316990/
  9. 8×63mm patron m/32 | Vietnam War | Fandom. Retrieved from https://vietnamwar.fandom.com/wiki/8%C3%9763mm_patron_m/32
  10. Gev m/39 and m/40. The Swedish K98 Rifles. Retrieved from http://www.gotavapen.se/gota/artiklar/rifles_se/gev40/g39g40.htm

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The Swedish cartridge 8x63 mm was created due to Sweden's lack of anti-tank guns.
Mostly False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Swedish cartridge 8x63 mm was created due to Sweden's lack of anti-tank guns.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Swedish cartridge 8x63 mm was created due to Sweden's lack of anti-tank guns.

Mar 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Swedish cartridge 8x63 mm was created due to a change in machine-gun doctrine.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Swedish cartridge 8x63 mm was created due to a change in machine-gun doctrine.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Swedish cartridge 8x63 mm was created due to a change in machine-gun doctrine.

Mar 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Swedish army trials showed that continued use of the 6.5x55 mm cartridge in machine guns would require a change in machine gun doctrine.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Swedish army trials showed that continued use of the 6.5x55 mm cartridge in machine guns would require a change in machine gun doctrine.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Swedish army trials showed that continued use of the 6.5x55 mm cartridge in machine guns would require a change in machine gun doctrine.

Mar 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Swedish army trials showed that using the 6.5x55 mm cartridge in machine guns would require a change in machine gun doctrine.
Unverified

Fact Check: Swedish army trials showed that using the 6.5x55 mm cartridge in machine guns would require a change in machine gun doctrine.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Swedish army trials showed that using the 6.5x55 mm cartridge in machine guns would require a change in machine gun doctrine.

Mar 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Swedish hard to learn?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is Swedish hard to learn?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Swedish hard to learn?

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post Cape Breton Politics Jason Boudreau · 1h · Big numbers in unions. 😁😁

Detailed fact-check analysis of: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post Cape Breton Politics Jason Boudreau · 1h · Big numbers in unions. 😁😁

Mar 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Swedish cartridge 8x63 mm was created due to Sweden's lack of anti-tank guns. | TruthOrFake Blog