Fact Check: The Smartmatic defamation case against Fox News has been decided in Smartmatic's favor.

Fact Check: The Smartmatic defamation case against Fox News has been decided in Smartmatic's favor.

Published May 28, 2025
VERDICT
False

# The Smartmatic Defamation Case Against Fox News: A Detailed Examination ## Introduction The claim that "The Smartmatic defamation case against Fox ...

The Smartmatic Defamation Case Against Fox News: A Detailed Examination

Introduction

The claim that "The Smartmatic defamation case against Fox News has been decided in Smartmatic's favor" suggests a resolution in the ongoing legal battle between the voting technology company Smartmatic and Fox News regarding allegations of defamation related to the 2020 presidential election. However, the current status of the case is more complex, with ongoing legal proceedings and no definitive ruling in favor of either party at this time.

What We Know

  1. Background of the Case: Smartmatic filed a $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News, claiming that the network spread false information about the company's role in the 2020 election, which allegedly damaged its reputation and business 7. This lawsuit follows a similar case involving Dominion Voting Systems, which resulted in a $787.5 million settlement for defamation against Fox News in April 2023 2.

  2. Current Legal Status: As of now, both Smartmatic and Fox News have filed motions for summary judgment, seeking a ruling in their favor without going to trial 210. This indicates that the case is still active, and no final decision has been made.

  3. Counterclaims and Legal Maneuvering: Fox News has countered Smartmatic's claims by arguing that the lawsuit is frivolous and intended to suppress its reporting 1. Additionally, Fox has accused Smartmatic of destroying evidence relevant to the case 56.

  4. Recent Developments: Recent court rulings have allowed Fox News to access certain materials related to Smartmatic's executives and their alleged misconduct, which Fox argues is pertinent to its defense 8. However, there has been no indication that the case has been resolved in favor of Smartmatic.

Analysis

The claim in question appears to misrepresent the current legal landscape of the Smartmatic vs. Fox News case. While Smartmatic is actively pursuing its defamation claims, there has been no ruling that definitively favors either party.

Source Evaluation

  • Reuters 1: A reputable news organization known for its factual reporting. The article discusses the legal proceedings and Fox's counterclaims, providing a balanced view of the ongoing litigation.
  • ABC News 2: A well-established news outlet that provides comprehensive coverage of significant legal matters. This source highlights the current motions filed by both parties, indicating that the case is still unresolved.
  • CNN 3: Offers a narrative on the case's implications and the financial stakes involved. While CNN is generally reliable, it is essential to consider its potential bias against Fox News, given the context of the reporting.
  • Smartmatic's Official Updates 4: While this source provides direct information from Smartmatic, it may reflect the company's perspective and interests, which could introduce bias.
  • Legal Commentary Sites 567: These sources provide insights into the legal arguments and strategies of both parties. However, the reliability can vary; legal blogs may not have the same editorial standards as established news organizations.

Conflicts of Interest

Smartmatic's official communications may be viewed as self-serving, aiming to bolster its public image and legal position. On the other hand, Fox News's counterclaims could be interpreted as an attempt to undermine Smartmatic's credibility, which raises questions about the objectivity of their statements.

Methodology and Evidence

The ongoing legal proceedings involve complex legal arguments and evidence submissions. The resolution of the case will depend on the judicial interpretation of defamation laws and the evidence presented by both parties. Additional information, such as detailed court documents and expert legal analyses, would be beneficial in understanding the nuances of the case.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that "The Smartmatic defamation case against Fox News has been decided in Smartmatic's favor" is false. The evidence indicates that the case is still active, with both parties seeking summary judgment and no definitive ruling made in favor of either side. The ongoing legal proceedings highlight the complexity of the situation, and while Smartmatic is pursuing its claims, the lack of a resolution means that the assertion of a favorable outcome for Smartmatic is misleading.

It is important to note that the legal landscape can change rapidly, and new developments may arise that could alter the current understanding of the case. As such, readers should remain aware of the evolving nature of legal disputes and the potential for new information to emerge.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider the context and nuances surrounding legal cases, as well as the potential biases of sources reporting on such matters.

Sources

  1. Smartmatic can't squelch Fox counterclaim in $2.7 billion defamation ... (https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/column-smartmatic-cant-squelch-fox-counterclaim-27-billion-defamation-suit-2024-01-24/)
  2. Fox News, Smartmatic file dueling motions for summary judgment in ... (https://abcnews.go.com/US/fox-news-smartmatic-file-dueling-motions-summary-judgment/story?id=121328259)
  3. Fox News gets a win in Smartmatic defamation case - CNN (https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/14/media/fox-news-smartmatic-appeals-court-documents)
  4. Lawsuit Updates - Smartmatic (https://www.smartmatic.com/us/lawsuit-updates/)
  5. Fox News Files Court Documents Accusing Smartmatic of Destroying ... (https://www.legalreader.com/fox-news-smartmatic-defamation-spoliation-discovery/)
  6. Fox News cannot depose billionaire in Smartmatic lawsuit - Law & Crime (https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/grossly-inflated-its-damage-claims-fox-news-gets-mixed-ruling-over-deposition-requests-in-smartmatic-lawsuit/)
  7. Smartmatic Lawsuit (https://blog.counselstack.com/smartmatic-lawsuit/)
  8. Fox News Granted Access to Smartmatic Bribery Indictment for Defamation ... (https://www.thewrap.com/fox-news-granted-access-to-smartmatic-bribery-indictment-materials/)
  9. Fox News motion claims Smartmatic had no good reputation to damage (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/3396554/fox-news-smartmatic-no-good-reputation-to-damage/)
  10. Fox And Smartmatic Seek Summary Judgments In Latest Filings In ... (https://deadline.com/2025/05/fox-news-smartmatic-defamation-1236382858/)

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Dominion Voting Systems won a $787 million settlement in a defamation lawsuit against Fox News over false claims aired about the company.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Dominion Voting Systems won a $787 million settlement in a defamation lawsuit against Fox News over false claims aired about the company.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Dominion Voting Systems won a $787 million settlement in a defamation lawsuit against Fox News over false claims aired about the company.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Gavin Newsom sues Fox News for $787 million in defamation!
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Gavin Newsom sues Fox News for $787 million in defamation!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Gavin Newsom sues Fox News for $787 million in defamation!

Jun 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A few months ago, Piers pledged to pay her almost $150,000 if the defamation case filed by Brigitte Macron against the «trans-accusers» didn’t prove their conspiracy theories false.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A few months ago, Piers pledged to pay her almost $150,000 if the defamation case filed by Brigitte Macron against the «trans-accusers» didn’t prove their conspiracy theories false.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A few months ago, Piers pledged to pay her almost $150,000 if the defamation case filed by Brigitte Macron against the «trans-accusers» didn’t prove their conspiracy theories false.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Fox News paid a $787.5 million settlement in a defamation lawsuit.
True

Fact Check: Fox News paid a $787.5 million settlement in a defamation lawsuit.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Fox News paid a $787.5 million settlement in a defamation lawsuit.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Fox News faces another defamation lawsuit amid ongoing media controversies.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Fox News faces another defamation lawsuit amid ongoing media controversies.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Fox News faces another defamation lawsuit amid ongoing media controversies.

Jun 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Newsom demands $787 million from Fox News in explosive defamation lawsuit.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Newsom demands $787 million from Fox News in explosive defamation lawsuit.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Newsom demands $787 million from Fox News in explosive defamation lawsuit.

Jun 28, 2025
Read more →