Fact Check: The Shining Path was endorsed in the music video for the RATM song “Bombtrack”

Fact Check: The Shining Path was endorsed in the music video for the RATM song “Bombtrack”

Published March 16, 2025Updated June 18, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The Shining Path was endorsed in the music video for the RATM song 'Bombtrack'" ## What We Know The claim that the music video for Rag...

Fact Check: "The Shining Path was endorsed in the music video for the RATM song 'Bombtrack'"

What We Know

The claim that the music video for Rage Against the Machine's (RATM) song "Bombtrack" endorses the Shining Path (Sendero Luminoso) is supported by several sources. The music video explicitly depicts support for the Peruvian Maoist organization and its leader, Abimael Guzmán. It opens with a statement that reads, "For 13 years the people of Peru have waged revolutionary war against their oppressive U.S.-backed government. Their movement is known as the Sendero luminoso or Shining Path" (source-1). This framing positions the Shining Path as a revolutionary force against perceived oppression, aligning with the band's broader political message.

The video also features imagery that references Guzmán's capture and presentation to journalists, symbolically placing the band in a cage, which mirrors Guzmán's own treatment (source-1). The lyrics of "Bombtrack" and other songs by RATM often address themes of social inequality and resistance, which further contextualizes their support for revolutionary movements like the Shining Path (source-2).

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim is robust, as the music video for "Bombtrack" directly references the Shining Path and portrays it in a sympathetic light. The initial text in the video explicitly states the group's revolutionary struggle against a U.S.-backed government, which can be interpreted as an endorsement of their actions and ideology (source-1).

However, it is important to note that the portrayal of the Shining Path has been met with criticism. Some observers argue that RATM's depiction oversimplifies a complex and violent conflict, and many Peruvians question the narrative presented by the band (source-5). This criticism highlights the potential for misinterpretation of the band's intentions and the consequences of their artistic choices.

The sources used in this analysis are credible, primarily drawn from Wikipedia entries that summarize the band's political activism and the content of their music videos. While Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, the specific entries used here are well-cited and reflect a consensus view on the band's political stance (source-1, source-2).

Conclusion

The claim that the music video for "Bombtrack" endorses the Shining Path is True. The video explicitly supports the organization and its revolutionary struggle against oppression, aligning with Rage Against the Machine's broader political messages. While there are valid criticisms of the band's portrayal of the Shining Path, the evidence clearly indicates that the video serves as an endorsement of the group's ideology.

Sources

  1. Bombtrack - Wikipedia
  2. Political views and activism of Rage Against the Machine
  3. Rage Against The Machine - Bombtrack (Official Video)
  4. Bombtrack by Rage Against the Machine - Songfacts
  5. Disputed reality: 'Bombtrack' and Peru's internal armed conflict

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Elon Musk claims to know a cure for neuropathy, in a video. Is it AI generated and fake?
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Elon Musk claims to know a cure for neuropathy, in a video. Is it AI generated and fake?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Elon Musk claims to know a cure for neuropathy, in a video. Is it AI generated and fake?

Jul 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 🎓 WHEN YOUR DAUGHTER’S SCHOOL TEACHES OBEDIENCE, NOT MATH
Sec. 30061 + DEI bans
➡️ Education turns into indoctrination. The path to college narrows. DEI is gone. If she’s not a legacy or male, she’s left behind.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 🎓 WHEN YOUR DAUGHTER’S SCHOOL TEACHES OBEDIENCE, NOT MATH Sec. 30061 + DEI bans ➡️ Education turns into indoctrination. The path to college narrows. DEI is gone. If she’s not a legacy or male, she’s left behind.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 🎓 WHEN YOUR DAUGHTER’S SCHOOL TEACHES OBEDIENCE, NOT MATH Sec. 30061 + DEI bans ➡️ Education turns into indoctrination. The path to college narrows. DEI is gone. If she’s not a legacy or male, she’s left behind.

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's actions may accelerate Iran's path to nuclear weapons.
False

Fact Check: Trump's actions may accelerate Iran's path to nuclear weapons.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's actions may accelerate Iran's path to nuclear weapons.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Supreme Court clears path for states to limit birthright citizenship.
Partially True

Fact Check: Supreme Court clears path for states to limit birthright citizenship.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Supreme Court clears path for states to limit birthright citizenship.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Supreme Court ruling clears path for states to limit birthright citizenship.
False

Fact Check: Supreme Court ruling clears path for states to limit birthright citizenship.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Supreme Court ruling clears path for states to limit birthright citizenship.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →