Fact Check: The Sacklers will pay $1.5 billion as part of the settlement, with Purdue contributing approximately $900 million in the first payment.

Published June 17, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: The Sacklers Will Pay $1.5 Billion as Part of the Settlement, with Purdue Contributing Approximately $900 Million in the First Payment ...

Fact Check: The Sacklers Will Pay $1.5 Billion as Part of the Settlement, with Purdue Contributing Approximately $900 Million in the First Payment

What We Know

The Sackler family, owners of Purdue Pharma, has agreed to pay a total of $1.5 billion as part of a settlement related to their role in the opioid crisis. Purdue Pharma will contribute approximately $900 million in the first payment of this settlement. The settlement, which totals $7.4 billion, is designed to resolve litigation against Purdue and the Sacklers and aims to provide funds for addiction treatment, prevention, and recovery efforts across the United States (source-1, source-2, source-3).

The settlement will be distributed over a period of 15 years, with the majority of funds allocated in the first three years. The payment schedule includes the initial $900 million from Purdue, followed by $500 million after one year, another $500 million after two years, and $400 million after three years (source-4, source-5).

Analysis

The claim that the Sacklers will pay $1.5 billion and Purdue will contribute $900 million in the first payment is supported by multiple reliable sources, including statements from various state attorneys general (source-1, source-2, source-3). These sources include official announcements from state attorneys general, which are typically credible due to their authoritative nature and the legal implications involved.

The settlement is described as the largest of its kind, aimed at addressing the opioid epidemic that has significantly impacted communities across the nation. The funds are intended for addiction treatment and recovery programs, which adds a layer of public interest and accountability to the settlement (source-6, source-7).

The reliability of the sources is high, as they come from official government websites and press releases, which are less likely to be biased or misleading compared to other forms of media. The consistent reporting across multiple states reinforces the accuracy of the claim.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that the Sacklers will pay $1.5 billion as part of the settlement, with Purdue contributing approximately $900 million in the first payment, is accurate. This information is corroborated by multiple credible sources, including official statements from state attorneys general involved in the settlement negotiations.

Sources

  1. AG Sunday Announces Historic Settlement with Purdue Pharma and Sackler Family Regarding Manufacture, Distribution of Opioids that Fueled Addiction Epidemic. Link
  2. 55 attorneys general sign on to $7.4 billion Purdue settlement. Link
  3. AG Nessel Signs On to $7.4 Billion Purdue Pharma Settlement. Link
  4. Attorney General Alan Wilson announces 55 attorneys general sign on to $7.4 billion Purdue settlement. Link
  5. Attorney General Bonta Signs On to $7.4 Billion Purdue Settlement. Link
  6. Attorney General James Secures $7.4 Billion from Purdue Pharma and the Sackler Family. Link
  7. Letitia James - New York State Attorney General. Link
  8. Carr: Georgia Joins National Settlement with Purdue Pharma to Resolve Opioid Crisis. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers will pay $1.5 billion and approximately $900 million in the first payment of the settlement.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers will pay $1.5 billion and approximately $900 million in the first payment of the settlement.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Purdue Pharma and the Sacklers will pay $1.5 billion and approximately $900 million in the first payment of the settlement.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Sacklers and Purdue Pharma increased their settlement contribution to $7.4 billion after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a prior settlement in June 2024.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Sacklers and Purdue Pharma increased their settlement contribution to $7.4 billion after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a prior settlement in June 2024.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Sacklers and Purdue Pharma increased their settlement contribution to $7.4 billion after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a prior settlement in June 2024.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The settlement will end the Sacklers' ownership of Purdue Pharma and bar them from making, selling, or marketing opioids in the U.S.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The settlement will end the Sacklers' ownership of Purdue Pharma and bar them from making, selling, or marketing opioids in the U.S.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The settlement will end the Sacklers' ownership of Purdue Pharma and bar them from making, selling, or marketing opioids in the U.S.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  PFAS manufacturers 3M and DuPont agreed to pay at least $12.5 billion 💰for their roles in contaminating state landfills and rivers with “forever chemicals.” For over 50 years, they knew that PFAS exposure could be linked to kidney and testicular cancer, but chose to keep the risk hidden from the public.

Those affected may be eligible for compensation. Check eligibility for a settlement today with our 1-minute evaluation. ⚡️
Partially True

Fact Check: PFAS manufacturers 3M and DuPont agreed to pay at least $12.5 billion 💰for their roles in contaminating state landfills and rivers with “forever chemicals.” For over 50 years, they knew that PFAS exposure could be linked to kidney and testicular cancer, but chose to keep the risk hidden from the public. Those affected may be eligible for compensation. Check eligibility for a settlement today with our 1-minute evaluation. ⚡️

Detailed fact-check analysis of: PFAS manufacturers 3M and DuPont agreed to pay at least $12.5 billion 💰for their roles in contaminating state landfills and rivers with “forever chemicals.” For over 50 years, they knew that PFAS exposure could be linked to kidney and testicular cancer, but chose to keep the risk hidden from the public. Those affected may be eligible for compensation. Check eligibility for a settlement today with our 1-minute evaluation. ⚡️

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: American taxpayers paid $10 million for trump to play golf and cut a ribbon in Scotland and to 'negotiate' a deal where you pay 15% more on most goods from Europe.
Partially True

Fact Check: American taxpayers paid $10 million for trump to play golf and cut a ribbon in Scotland and to 'negotiate' a deal where you pay 15% more on most goods from Europe.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: American taxpayers paid $10 million for trump to play golf and cut a ribbon in Scotland and to 'negotiate' a deal where you pay 15% more on most goods from Europe.

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →