Fact Check: The review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week.

Fact Check: The review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week.

Published June 13, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week." ## What We Know Re...

Fact Check: "The review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week."

What We Know

Recent reports indicate that the White House has initiated a review of SpaceX contracts amid a public feud between President Trump and Elon Musk. According to Reuters, the administration directed the Defense Department and NASA to gather details on billions of dollars in contracts with SpaceX following Trump's threats to potentially terminate these agreements. The review is seen as a response to Trump's comments about Musk's behavior and his public spat with the billionaire, which included accusations of drug use and personal insults.

Trump's threats were made during a series of social media posts where he expressed dissatisfaction with Musk's actions and suggested that the government might reconsider its business dealings with Musk's companies. Specifically, Trump stated, "We’ll take a look at everything," indicating that the administration was contemplating a thorough review of Musk's contracts (source-2).

Analysis

The claim that the administration is following through on Trump's threat is supported by multiple sources. The Reuters article confirms that the review of SpaceX contracts was initiated as a direct response to the public fallout between Trump and Musk, which included Trump's threats to cut government contracts. This aligns with statements made by Trump, who has publicly expressed a willingness to reconsider the government's relationship with Musk's businesses (source-3).

However, it is important to assess the reliability of the sources. Reuters is a well-established news organization known for its factual reporting, which lends credibility to their claims. The New York Times also provides corroborative details about Trump's threats and the ensuing review process, further validating the information (source-3).

On the other hand, some sources, like Yahoo News and CBS News, provide additional context about the nature of Trump's threats, describing them as serious and potentially damaging to Musk's business interests (source-7, source-8). These reports emphasize the potential consequences of the feud, highlighting the precarious position Musk finds himself in due to his reliance on government contracts.

Conclusion

The evidence supports the claim that the administration is indeed following through on a threat made by Trump during his public spat with Musk. The initiation of a review of SpaceX contracts directly correlates with Trump's statements and actions, indicating a willingness to leverage government contracts as a form of political leverage. Therefore, the verdict is True.

Sources

  1. White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers
  2. Trump-Musk spat: Does it pose a regulatory threat for the billionaire?
  3. Trump's Relationship With Musk Remains Icy as Public Feud Escalates
  4. White House Reviews SpaceX Contracts as Trump-Musk Feud Simmers
  5. Elon Musk Is a Security Risk
  6. Elon's Explosion at Trump Appears to Have Cost Him a HUGE Deal
  7. Trump Issues New Threat to Elon Musk
  8. Trump threatens Musk with "serious consequences" if he continues

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: HOLY SHIT:
Content In Review
Let's EFFING go!!!!!!!
OC <redacted_social_handle>
Mike Pence just TORCHED Trump on Epstein: "Release ALL the files"
"I know of no reason why this administration, once the victims' names are protected, should not release all the files."
Protect victims. EXPOSE the accomplices. Release the files!!
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: HOLY SHIT: Content In Review Let's EFFING go!!!!!!! OC <redacted_social_handle> Mike Pence just TORCHED Trump on Epstein: "Release ALL the files" "I know of no reason why this administration, once the victims' names are protected, should not release all the files." Protect victims. EXPOSE the accomplices. Release the files!!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: HOLY SHIT: Content In Review Let's EFFING go!!!!!!! OC <redacted_social_handle> Mike Pence just TORCHED Trump on Epstein: "Release ALL the files" "I know of no reason why this administration, once the victims' names are protected, should not release all the files." Protect victims. EXPOSE the accomplices. Release the files!!

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files.

The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up.

Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files. The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up. Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files. The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up. Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. Supreme Court has the authority to review state laws.
True

Fact Check: The U.S. Supreme Court has the authority to review state laws.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. Supreme Court has the authority to review state laws.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The CIA and FBI conducted a review of their intelligence assessments.
True

Fact Check: The CIA and FBI conducted a review of their intelligence assessments.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The CIA and FBI conducted a review of their intelligence assessments.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Intelligence community assessments are often subject to review.
True

Fact Check: Intelligence community assessments are often subject to review.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Intelligence community assessments are often subject to review.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →