TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: The ratio of immigrants without criminal records stopped at the border was 30 to 1.

Fact Check: The ratio of immigrants without criminal records stopped at the border was 30 to 1.

Published July 2, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Fact Check: "The ratio of immigrants without criminal records stopped at the border was 30 to 1." ## What We Know The claim that "the ratio of immi...

Fact Check: "The ratio of immigrants without criminal records stopped at the border was 30 to 1."

What We Know

The claim that "the ratio of immigrants without criminal records stopped at the border was 30 to 1" suggests a significant disparity between non-criminal and criminal immigrants apprehended at the U.S. border. According to a report from CBS News, recent statistics indicate that among those detained by ICE, a substantial number do not have criminal records. Specifically, it was noted that the number of non-criminal immigrants detained has increased dramatically, with some reports indicating a ratio of 30 non-criminal immigrants for every criminal immigrant apprehended at the border. This statistic aligns with broader discussions about immigration enforcement practices and the profiles of individuals being detained.

Analysis

The source of the claim appears to be a report from The Nation, which discusses the increase in detentions of non-criminal immigrants and cites the 30 to 1 ratio. However, while this source provides a specific figure, it is essential to evaluate the reliability and context of such claims. The statistics surrounding immigration are often complex and can vary significantly based on the definitions used (e.g., what constitutes a "criminal record").

The CBP Enforcement Statistics and ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Statistics provide a more comprehensive overview of immigration enforcement but do not explicitly confirm the 30 to 1 ratio. Instead, they offer data on criminal noncitizen statistics, which can be interpreted in various ways depending on the context.

Additionally, the broader context of immigration enforcement suggests that while many immigrants apprehended may not have criminal records, the framing of the statistic can influence public perception. The claim's origin from a politically charged source may also introduce bias, as discussions around immigration often intersect with political agendas.

Conclusion

The claim that "the ratio of immigrants without criminal records stopped at the border was 30 to 1" remains Unverified. While there are reports suggesting a high ratio of non-criminal to criminal immigrants, the lack of direct corroboration from multiple reliable sources and the potential for bias in the originating report necessitate caution. More comprehensive data and context are required to substantiate this claim fully.

Sources

  1. CBP Enforcement Statistics
  2. ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Statistics
  3. Illegal immigration to the United States
  4. query - Traduction française – Linguee
  5. ICE detentions of non-criminal immigrants spike; about 8...
  6. Qu’est-ce que Power Query ? - Power Query | Microsoft Learn
  7. Trump's Big Bill Is Building a Big Police State
  8. QUERY | traduire en français - Cambridge Dictionary

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Did the Biden ministration give illegal immigrants, Social Security?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Did the Biden ministration give illegal immigrants, Social Security?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did the Biden ministration give illegal immigrants, Social Security?

Aug 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: The ratio of immigrants without criminal records stopped at the border was 30 to 1. | TruthOrFake Blog