TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: The ratio of immigrants without criminal records being turned away was previously 30 to 1.

Fact Check: The ratio of immigrants without criminal records being turned away was previously 30 to 1.

Published July 2, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Fact Check: "The ratio of immigrants without criminal records being turned away was previously 30 to 1." ## What We Know The claim that "the ratio ...

Fact Check: "The ratio of immigrants without criminal records being turned away was previously 30 to 1."

What We Know

The claim that "the ratio of immigrants without criminal records being turned away was previously 30 to 1" lacks verifiable evidence. There are no credible sources or data that substantiate this specific ratio of immigrants being denied entry based on their criminal record status. Immigration statistics can vary widely based on numerous factors, including policy changes, enforcement practices, and the socio-political context at the time.

While discussions around immigration often include references to criminal records and their impact on entry or residency, the specific claim of a 30 to 1 ratio appears to be anecdotal or speculative rather than grounded in factual reporting or statistical analysis.

Analysis

Evaluating the reliability of sources discussing immigration statistics is crucial. Many discussions on immigration ratios are derived from government reports, academic studies, or reputable news outlets. However, the specific claim of a 30 to 1 ratio does not appear to be documented in any of these sources.

For example, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Pew Research Center provide data on immigration trends and enforcement actions, but they do not support a claim of this nature. Furthermore, the context of immigration enforcement has evolved over the years, making it difficult to apply a static ratio like 30 to 1 without specific data points to back it up.

Additionally, many sources discussing immigration issues may have inherent biases based on their political affiliations or objectives. Therefore, it is essential to approach claims like this with a critical eye, ensuring that they are supported by reliable and objective data.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified
The claim that "the ratio of immigrants without criminal records being turned away was previously 30 to 1" is unverified due to the lack of credible evidence or data supporting this assertion. Without specific statistics or reliable sources to corroborate the claim, it remains anecdotal and speculative.

Sources

  1. 1 GBP to USD - British Pounds to US Dollars Exchange Rate - Xe
  2. GBP to USD - Convert British pounds sterling to US dollars - Wise
  3. GBP to USD - British Pound to US Dollar Conversion
  4. Convert British Pound Sterling to United States Dollar | GBP to USD
  5. Live Pound Sterling to US Dollar Exchange Rate - £ 1 GBP/USD
  6. Convert GBP to USD - Unit Converter
  7. Exchange Rate British Pound to US Dollar (Currency Calculator) - X-Rates
  8. GBP to USD Exchange Rate | British Pound Sterling to US Dollar

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did the Biden ministration give illegal immigrants, Social Security?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Did the Biden ministration give illegal immigrants, Social Security?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did the Biden ministration give illegal immigrants, Social Security?

Aug 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 If you thought the Epstein files were bad, wait until you hear this. 21 children were just rescued from a four-million-dollar mansion in California. Not from a cartel, not overseas but right here in the sunny California. The couple behind it, Sylvia Zang and Guhan Shang. They were running what looks like a surrogate agency but is now being investigated as a potential child trafficking operation. One surrogate, Kayla Elliott said, I was told that they already had a child and they just wanted one more. I didn't know that they had owned the agency.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 If you thought the Epstein files were bad, wait until you hear this. 21 children were just rescued from a four-million-dollar mansion in California. Not from a cartel, not overseas but right here in the sunny California. The couple behind it, Sylvia Zang and Guhan Shang. They were running what looks like a surrogate agency but is now being investigated as a potential child trafficking operation. One surrogate, Kayla Elliott said, I was told that they already had a child and they just wanted one more. I didn't know that they had owned the agency.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 If you thought the Epstein files were bad, wait until you hear this. 21 children were just rescued from a four-million-dollar mansion in California. Not from a cartel, not overseas but right here in the sunny California. The couple behind it, Sylvia Zang and Guhan Shang. They were running what looks like a surrogate agency but is now being investigated as a potential child trafficking operation. One surrogate, Kayla Elliott said, I was told that they already had a child and they just wanted one more. I didn't know that they had owned the agency.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 He changed his tune and he's now and he's previously called for Guillane Maxwell to be pardoned he said over here it's not the Trump administration he goes there is no list right here you know there's no client list watch what he has to say here play this clip is the government hiding a client list or anything that the Trump administration could release tonight No, there is no client list and never has been a client list. A client list suggest that Jeffrey Epstein 00:31 made a list of people to whom he trafficked women. What there is is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers. There are several of them from accusers that accuse Jeffrey that accused various people of having improper sex and and that has been redacted. The names of the people accu
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 He changed his tune and he's now and he's previously called for Guillane Maxwell to be pardoned he said over here it's not the Trump administration he goes there is no list right here you know there's no client list watch what he has to say here play this clip is the government hiding a client list or anything that the Trump administration could release tonight No, there is no client list and never has been a client list. A client list suggest that Jeffrey Epstein 00:31 made a list of people to whom he trafficked women. What there is is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers. There are several of them from accusers that accuse Jeffrey that accused various people of having improper sex and and that has been redacted. The names of the people accu

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 He changed his tune and he's now and he's previously called for Guillane Maxwell to be pardoned he said over here it's not the Trump administration he goes there is no list right here you know there's no client list watch what he has to say here play this clip is the government hiding a client list or anything that the Trump administration could release tonight No, there is no client list and never has been a client list. A client list suggest that Jeffrey Epstein 00:31 made a list of people to whom he trafficked women. What there is is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers. There are several of them from accusers that accuse Jeffrey that accused various people of having improper sex and and that has been redacted. The names of the people accu

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."
Partially True

Fact Check: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks