TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: The ratio of immigrants without criminal records being stopped at the border was 30 to 1.

Fact Check: The ratio of immigrants without criminal records being stopped at the border was 30 to 1.

Published July 1, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Fact Check: "The ratio of immigrants without criminal records being stopped at the border was 30 to 1." ## What We Know The claim that the ratio of...

Fact Check: "The ratio of immigrants without criminal records being stopped at the border was 30 to 1."

What We Know

The claim that the ratio of immigrants without criminal records being stopped at the border is 30 to 1 has been referenced in discussions surrounding immigration enforcement statistics. According to a report by The Nation, it was stated that Customs and Border Patrol agents had previously stopped most immigrants without criminal records at this ratio. However, this assertion lacks comprehensive context and verification.

Recent data from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) indicates that as of July 21, 2024, there were 662,556 individuals under ICE supervision who were either convicted of crimes or facing criminal charges, with nearly 15,000 in custody (AP News). The majority of these individuals were not detained by ICE, which complicates the interpretation of the statistics. The Department of Homeland Security clarified that these numbers include individuals who may be detained by state or local agencies, and not solely by ICE (AP News).

Analysis

The claim's validity hinges on the interpretation of statistics regarding immigrants stopped at the border. While the assertion of a 30 to 1 ratio suggests a significant disparity between those without criminal records and those with, the source from The Nation does not provide detailed data or methodology to substantiate this claim.

Moreover, the context provided by ICE and the Department of Homeland Security indicates that many individuals classified as "non-detained" may still be under supervision or facing legal proceedings, which complicates the narrative of a straightforward ratio. The statistics cited by ICE reflect a broader historical context, including data from previous administrations, which may not accurately reflect the current situation under the Biden administration (BBC).

The reliability of the sources reporting this claim varies. The Nation, while a reputable publication, has a progressive editorial stance that may influence its interpretation of immigration data. In contrast, the AP News and ICE provide official statistics and clarifications that offer a more nuanced view of the immigration enforcement landscape.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The claim that the ratio of immigrants without criminal records being stopped at the border is 30 to 1 remains unverified due to a lack of comprehensive data and context. While the assertion is based on reported statistics, the interpretation of these figures is contentious and requires further substantiation to be deemed accurate.

Sources

  1. ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Statistics
  2. Criminal Alien Statistics Fiscal Year 2024
  3. CBP Enforcement Statistics
  4. NEW DATA REVEAL WORSENING MAGNITUDE OF THE ...
  5. Trump points to new numbers on migrants with criminal ...
  6. Migrants with criminal records - what new US data shows
  7. すぐに使える研修報告書テンプレート（Excel・Word）無料・登 …
  8. Trump's Big Bill Is Building a Big Police State

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did the Biden ministration give illegal immigrants, Social Security?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Did the Biden ministration give illegal immigrants, Social Security?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did the Biden ministration give illegal immigrants, Social Security?

Aug 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 If you thought the Epstein files were bad, wait until you hear this. 21 children were just rescued from a four-million-dollar mansion in California. Not from a cartel, not overseas but right here in the sunny California. The couple behind it, Sylvia Zang and Guhan Shang. They were running what looks like a surrogate agency but is now being investigated as a potential child trafficking operation. One surrogate, Kayla Elliott said, I was told that they already had a child and they just wanted one more. I didn't know that they had owned the agency.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 If you thought the Epstein files were bad, wait until you hear this. 21 children were just rescued from a four-million-dollar mansion in California. Not from a cartel, not overseas but right here in the sunny California. The couple behind it, Sylvia Zang and Guhan Shang. They were running what looks like a surrogate agency but is now being investigated as a potential child trafficking operation. One surrogate, Kayla Elliott said, I was told that they already had a child and they just wanted one more. I didn't know that they had owned the agency.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 If you thought the Epstein files were bad, wait until you hear this. 21 children were just rescued from a four-million-dollar mansion in California. Not from a cartel, not overseas but right here in the sunny California. The couple behind it, Sylvia Zang and Guhan Shang. They were running what looks like a surrogate agency but is now being investigated as a potential child trafficking operation. One surrogate, Kayla Elliott said, I was told that they already had a child and they just wanted one more. I didn't know that they had owned the agency.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."
Partially True

Fact Check: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: The ratio of immigrants without criminal records being stopped at the border was 30 to 1. | TruthOrFake Blog