Fact Check: The Little Ice Age occurred roughly from the 16th to 19th centuries.

Fact Check: The Little Ice Age occurred roughly from the 16th to 19th centuries.

Published July 1, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "The Little Ice Age occurred roughly from the 16th to 19th centuries." ## What We Know The term "Little Ice Age" (LIA) refers to a peri...

Fact Check: "The Little Ice Age occurred roughly from the 16th to 19th centuries."

What We Know

The term "Little Ice Age" (LIA) refers to a period of regional cooling that particularly affected the North Atlantic region, characterized by significant glacial advances and colder temperatures. The conventional timeframe for the LIA is often cited as extending from the 16th to the 19th centuries, specifically from around 1500 to 1850 (source-3). However, some researchers argue for a broader timeframe, suggesting it began as early as 1300 and extended to about 1850 (source-1, source-3).

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has noted that the LIA was not a globally synchronous event, but rather a period marked by regional climate changes, with modest cooling in the Northern Hemisphere of less than 1°C relative to late 20th-century levels (source-2). The cooling was punctuated by intervals of slight warming, with significant cold periods occurring around 1650, 1770, and 1850 (source-3).

Analysis

The claim that the Little Ice Age occurred from the 16th to 19th centuries is partially true. While this timeframe is widely accepted, it is essential to recognize that there is no consensus on the exact start and end dates of the LIA. Some experts advocate for an earlier start around 1300, which indicates that the cooling period could be more extensive than the claim suggests (source-1, source-3).

Moreover, the IPCC's reports highlight that the LIA's effects were not uniform across the globe, suggesting that while some regions experienced significant cooling, others did not, and the overall impact was more complex than a simple linear timeframe might imply (source-2). Therefore, while the claim captures a significant aspect of the LIA, it oversimplifies the nuances of its timing and regional variations.

Conclusion

The verdict is Partially True. The claim that the Little Ice Age occurred from the 16th to 19th centuries is supported by conventional definitions; however, it overlooks the broader scholarly debate regarding its actual start date and the regional variability of climate changes during this period. The LIA is better understood as a complex phenomenon with significant regional differences rather than a strictly defined global event.

Sources

  1. The Effects of the Little Ice Age (c. 1300-1850)
  2. Little Ice Age
  3. Little Ice Age - Wikipedia
  4. Little Ice Age (LIA) - Britannica

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The Little Ice Age occurred from the 16th to 19th centuries.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Little Ice Age occurred from the 16th to 19th centuries.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Little Ice Age occurred from the 16th to 19th centuries.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: ICE detainee transport increasingly handled by private companies with little oversight.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: ICE detainee transport increasingly handled by private companies with little oversight.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: ICE detainee transport increasingly handled by private companies with little oversight.

Jun 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: ICE detainee transport increasingly privatized with little oversight!
False

Fact Check: ICE detainee transport increasingly privatized with little oversight!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: ICE detainee transport increasingly privatized with little oversight!

Jun 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  over 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, with little or no savings and under constant threat of financial collapse. Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023.
Partially True

Fact Check: over 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, with little or no savings and under constant threat of financial collapse. Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: over 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, with little or no savings and under constant threat of financial collapse. Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023.

Aug 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: It is normal to be a little poor.
Partially True

Fact Check: It is normal to be a little poor.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: It is normal to be a little poor.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →