TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: The IUD scandal involved 4,500 women fitted with contraception without consent between 1966 and 1970.

Fact Check: The IUD scandal involved 4,500 women fitted with contraception without consent between 1966 and 1970.

Published July 1, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Fact Check: "The IUD scandal involved 4,500 women fitted with contraception without consent between 1966 and 1970." ## What We Know The claim that ...

Fact Check: "The IUD scandal involved 4,500 women fitted with contraception without consent between 1966 and 1970."

What We Know

The claim that 4,500 women were fitted with intrauterine devices (IUDs) without consent between 1966 and 1970 lacks substantial evidence. The term "IUD scandal" may refer to various historical instances where medical practices involving IUDs were controversial, particularly regarding informed consent and ethical standards. However, specific data supporting the figure of 4,500 women and the exact timeframe remains unverified.

The European Commission has established a unique device identifier (IUD) system to enhance the traceability and safety of medical devices, including IUDs. This system was introduced to prevent issues related to medical device recalls and counterfeit products, emphasizing the importance of informed consent and patient safety. However, historical records from the 1960s and 1970s regarding IUD usage and consent practices are not comprehensively documented in the available sources.

Analysis

The claim appears to stem from a broader discourse on the ethical implications of IUD usage during the 1960s and 1970s. During this period, many women were subjected to medical procedures without adequate consent, particularly in the context of birth control. However, the specific assertion regarding 4,500 women fitted with IUDs without consent is not substantiated by credible historical records or research.

The sources available, including those from the European Commission and various medical literature, do not provide direct evidence of this claim. The Commission's documentation focuses on the regulatory framework established for IUDs and does not address historical malpractice or specific incidents involving non-consensual procedures. Furthermore, while there are discussions about the prevalence of IUDs in certain populations, such as in China where a significant percentage of IUD users reside, these discussions do not correlate with the claim about non-consensual fittings in the specified timeframe (source-2).

The lack of specific, verifiable sources makes it difficult to assess the claim's validity. Additionally, the historical context of medical ethics in the 1960s and 1970s suggests that while there were indeed issues related to consent, the exact figure of 4,500 women remains unverified.

Conclusion

The claim that "4,500 women were fitted with contraception without consent between 1966 and 1970" is Unverified. The available evidence does not support this specific assertion, and while there are historical concerns regarding the ethical treatment of women in medical contexts, the claim lacks substantiation from credible sources.

Sources

  1. Identifiant unique des dispositifs (IUD) - Commission européenne
  2. 为什么不在（未生育过的）女性中推广使用宫内节育 ...
  3. Enregistrement des IUD/dispositifs - Commission européenne
  4. IUD（避妊リング）を装着されている方に質問です ...
  5. 避孕环的原理是什么，对女性有伤害么？
  6. Fiche d’information à l’intention des fabricants de dispositifs ...
  7. Identificatori unici ai dispozitivelor – IUD - Comisia Europeană
  8. européenne Fiche d’information sur les dispositifs médicaux de clas

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The IUD scandal involved 4,500 women fitted with contraception without consent.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The IUD scandal involved 4,500 women fitted with contraception without consent.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The IUD scandal involved 4,500 women fitted with contraception without consent.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: TRUTH ABOUT THE FBI SPY SCANDAL AND PLOT TO OVERTHROW A DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT IS WORKING ITS WAY UP THE CHAIN. WE KNOW WHERE IT WILL LEAD.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: TRUTH ABOUT THE FBI SPY SCANDAL AND PLOT TO OVERTHROW A DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT IS WORKING ITS WAY UP THE CHAIN. WE KNOW WHERE IT WILL LEAD.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: TRUTH ABOUT THE FBI SPY SCANDAL AND PLOT TO OVERTHROW A DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT IS WORKING ITS WAY UP THE CHAIN. WE KNOW WHERE IT WILL LEAD.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hegseth BACKSTABBS Trump After Publicly Exposing Trump's Health SCANDAL Live On Air
Unverified

Fact Check: Hegseth BACKSTABBS Trump After Publicly Exposing Trump's Health SCANDAL Live On Air

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hegseth BACKSTABBS Trump After Publicly Exposing Trump's Health SCANDAL Live On Air

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Watergate scandal led to campaign finance reforms in the United States.
Unverified

Fact Check: The Watergate scandal led to campaign finance reforms in the United States.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Watergate scandal led to campaign finance reforms in the United States.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The corruption scandal is one of the most serious since Spain's democracy restoration.
Partially True

Fact Check: The corruption scandal is one of the most serious since Spain's democracy restoration.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The corruption scandal is one of the most serious since Spain's democracy restoration.

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: The IUD scandal involved 4,500 women fitted with contraception without consent between 1966 and 1970. | TruthOrFake Blog