Fact Check: The IAEA stated that its initial assessment indicated that the above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Natanz was destroyed, but the larger underground plant was not directly hit.

Fact Check: The IAEA stated that its initial assessment indicated that the above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Natanz was destroyed, but the larger underground plant was not directly hit.

June 17, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "The IAEA stated that its initial assessment indicated that the above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Natanz was destroyed, but the lar...

Fact Check: "The IAEA stated that its initial assessment indicated that the above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Natanz was destroyed, but the larger underground plant was not directly hit."

What We Know

The claim revolves around the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) assessments of damage to Iran's Natanz nuclear facility following an Israeli airstrike. Initial reports from the IAEA confirmed that the above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Natanz was destroyed, but they initially indicated that the underground enrichment plant had not sustained direct hits, only indirect damage (source-1). However, subsequent analysis of high-resolution satellite imagery led the IAEA to revise its assessment, confirming that the underground enrichment halls also sustained direct impacts (source-1, source-5).

Analysis

The initial assessment by the IAEA suggested that while the above-ground facility was destroyed, the underground plant was not directly hit. This assessment was based on early satellite imagery and information available at that time (source-1). However, the IAEA later confirmed that further analysis revealed direct impacts on the underground enrichment halls, contradicting the earlier statement (source-1, source-5).

The reliability of the IAEA as a source is generally high, as it is an established international organization responsible for monitoring nuclear facilities and ensuring compliance with nuclear non-proliferation agreements (source-3). However, the evolving nature of the situation, with new evidence emerging from satellite imagery, highlights the complexities and challenges in accurately assessing damage in real-time.

Conclusion

The claim that the IAEA stated its initial assessment indicated that the above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Natanz was destroyed, but the larger underground plant was not directly hit is False. The IAEA's initial assessment was revised to confirm that the underground facility also sustained direct impacts, contradicting the original claim.

Sources

  1. Israeli strike directly hit Iran's Natanz underground enrichment plant, IAEA says
  2. Likely all machines at Iran's main enrichment plant 'destroyed'
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency | Atoms for Peace and …
  4. Overview | IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency
  5. Israeli strike directly hit underground Natanz enrichment plant, IAEA confirms

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the above-ground part of the Natanz nuclear plant had been destroyed but noted no apparent damage to its underground chambers.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the above-ground part of the Natanz nuclear plant had been destroyed but noted no apparent damage to its underground chambers.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the above-ground part of the Natanz nuclear plant had been destroyed but noted no apparent damage to its underground chambers.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the above-ground part of the Natanz nuclear plant was destroyed but noted no apparent damage to its underground chambers.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the above-ground part of the Natanz nuclear plant was destroyed but noted no apparent damage to its underground chambers.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the above-ground part of the Natanz nuclear plant was destroyed but noted no apparent damage to its underground chambers.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported on June 17, 2025, that an Israeli military strike directly hit the underground uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, Iran.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported on June 17, 2025, that an Israeli military strike directly hit the underground uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, Iran.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported on June 17, 2025, that an Israeli military strike directly hit the underground uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, Iran.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The IAEA reported that several facilities were destroyed at the Isfahan nuclear complex, including Iran's plant that converts uranium for enrichment.
Partially True

Fact Check: The IAEA reported that several facilities were destroyed at the Isfahan nuclear complex, including Iran's plant that converts uranium for enrichment.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The IAEA reported that several facilities were destroyed at the Isfahan nuclear complex, including Iran's plant that converts uranium for enrichment.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: IAEA chief Rafael Grossi reported on June 16, 2025, that the centrifuges at Natanz very likely sustained significant damage due to a strike on the plant's power supply.
False

Fact Check: IAEA chief Rafael Grossi reported on June 16, 2025, that the centrifuges at Natanz very likely sustained significant damage due to a strike on the plant's power supply.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: IAEA chief Rafael Grossi reported on June 16, 2025, that the centrifuges at Natanz very likely sustained significant damage due to a strike on the plant's power supply.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: President Donald Trump stated on October 1, 2023, that the United States is not currently involved in Israel's military strikes against Iran, but 'it's possible we could get involved.'
Partially True

Fact Check: President Donald Trump stated on October 1, 2023, that the United States is not currently involved in Israel's military strikes against Iran, but 'it's possible we could get involved.'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: President Donald Trump stated on October 1, 2023, that the United States is not currently involved in Israel's military strikes against Iran, but 'it's possible we could get involved.'

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →