Fact Check: The IAEA confirmed on June 17, 2025, that there was no change to report at Iran's two other major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow.

Fact Check: The IAEA confirmed on June 17, 2025, that there was no change to report at Iran's two other major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow.

June 17, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The IAEA confirmed on June 17, 2025, that there was no change to report at Iran's two other major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow." ...

Fact Check: "The IAEA confirmed on June 17, 2025, that there was no change to report at Iran's two other major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow."

What We Know

On June 17, 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that there was "no change to report" at Iran's two major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow, following military strikes that impacted the Natanz enrichment facility. The IAEA confirmed that, despite the damage at Natanz, both Isfahan and Fordow had not been affected by the attacks (IAEA Statement) (Reuters). This statement was made after the agency analyzed high-resolution satellite imagery and received updates from Iranian authorities, who indicated that there were no elevated radiation levels at the unaffected sites (Reuters).

Analysis

The IAEA is recognized as the authoritative body overseeing nuclear safety and security, making its statements highly credible. The agency's confirmation that there was no change at Isfahan and Fordow is supported by multiple reports and statements from both the IAEA and independent news sources (IAEA Statement) (Reuters).

The context of the claim is crucial; it follows military actions that specifically targeted the Natanz facility, which is known for its uranium enrichment activities. The IAEA's assessment that Isfahan and Fordow remained unaffected suggests a focused impact of the military operations, which aligns with the agency's ongoing monitoring efforts and its commitment to nuclear safety (IAEA Statement).

While the IAEA's reports are generally reliable, it's important to note that the situation is fluid, and the agency has indicated that it is unable to conduct on-site inspections due to security concerns. This limitation could affect the comprehensiveness of their assessments (Reuters). However, the use of satellite imagery and information from Iranian authorities provides a reasonable basis for their conclusions.

Conclusion

The claim that "the IAEA confirmed on June 17, 2025, that there was no change to report at Iran's two other major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow" is True. The IAEA's statements and supporting evidence from reliable news sources confirm that both sites remained unaffected by the recent military actions targeting Natanz, thereby validating the claim.

Sources

  1. IAEA Statement on the situation in Iran
  2. Israeli Strike Directly Hit Iran's Natanz Underground Enrichment Plant
  3. IAEA says no damage seen at Iran's Fordow or Khondab nuclear sites

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported on June 17, 2025, that an Israeli military strike directly hit the underground uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, Iran.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported on June 17, 2025, that an Israeli military strike directly hit the underground uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, Iran.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported on June 17, 2025, that an Israeli military strike directly hit the underground uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, Iran.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) expressed concern over the Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities following the attacks on June 13, 2023.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) expressed concern over the Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities following the attacks on June 13, 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) expressed concern over the Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities following the attacks on June 13, 2023.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The IAEA reported that several facilities were destroyed at the Isfahan nuclear complex, including Iran's plant that converts uranium for enrichment.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The IAEA reported that several facilities were destroyed at the Isfahan nuclear complex, including Iran's plant that converts uranium for enrichment.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The IAEA reported that several facilities were destroyed at the Isfahan nuclear complex, including Iran's plant that converts uranium for enrichment.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The IAEA reported no increase in off-site radiation at either the Natanz or Isfahan nuclear facilities following the strikes as of October 2023.
True

Fact Check: The IAEA reported no increase in off-site radiation at either the Natanz or Isfahan nuclear facilities following the strikes as of October 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The IAEA reported no increase in off-site radiation at either the Natanz or Isfahan nuclear facilities following the strikes as of October 2023.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the above-ground part of the Natanz nuclear plant had been destroyed but noted no apparent damage to its underground chambers.
True

Fact Check: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the above-ground part of the Natanz nuclear plant had been destroyed but noted no apparent damage to its underground chambers.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the above-ground part of the Natanz nuclear plant had been destroyed but noted no apparent damage to its underground chambers.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey confirmed the death toll from the flooding had risen to six on June 17, 2025.
True

Fact Check: West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey confirmed the death toll from the flooding had risen to six on June 17, 2025.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey confirmed the death toll from the flooding had risen to six on June 17, 2025.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →