Fact Check: The IAEA confirmed on June 17, 2025, that there was no change to report at Iran's two other major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow.

Fact Check: The IAEA confirmed on June 17, 2025, that there was no change to report at Iran's two other major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow.

Published June 17, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The IAEA confirmed on June 17, 2025, that there was no change to report at Iran's two other major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow." ...

Fact Check: "The IAEA confirmed on June 17, 2025, that there was no change to report at Iran's two other major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow."

What We Know

On June 17, 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that there was "no change to report" at Iran's two major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow, following military strikes that impacted the Natanz enrichment facility. The IAEA confirmed that, despite the damage at Natanz, both Isfahan and Fordow had not been affected by the attacks (IAEA Statement) (Reuters). This statement was made after the agency analyzed high-resolution satellite imagery and received updates from Iranian authorities, who indicated that there were no elevated radiation levels at the unaffected sites (Reuters).

Analysis

The IAEA is recognized as the authoritative body overseeing nuclear safety and security, making its statements highly credible. The agency's confirmation that there was no change at Isfahan and Fordow is supported by multiple reports and statements from both the IAEA and independent news sources (IAEA Statement) (Reuters).

The context of the claim is crucial; it follows military actions that specifically targeted the Natanz facility, which is known for its uranium enrichment activities. The IAEA's assessment that Isfahan and Fordow remained unaffected suggests a focused impact of the military operations, which aligns with the agency's ongoing monitoring efforts and its commitment to nuclear safety (IAEA Statement).

While the IAEA's reports are generally reliable, it's important to note that the situation is fluid, and the agency has indicated that it is unable to conduct on-site inspections due to security concerns. This limitation could affect the comprehensiveness of their assessments (Reuters). However, the use of satellite imagery and information from Iranian authorities provides a reasonable basis for their conclusions.

Conclusion

The claim that "the IAEA confirmed on June 17, 2025, that there was no change to report at Iran's two other major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow" is True. The IAEA's statements and supporting evidence from reliable news sources confirm that both sites remained unaffected by the recent military actions targeting Natanz, thereby validating the claim.

Sources

  1. IAEA Statement on the situation in Iran
  2. Israeli Strike Directly Hit Iran's Natanz Underground Enrichment Plant
  3. IAEA says no damage seen at Iran's Fordow or Khondab nuclear sites

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

Fact Check: The IAEA confirmed on June 17, 2025, that there was no change to report at Iran's two other major nuclear sites, Isfahan and Fordow. | TruthOrFake Blog