Fact Check: The globals are preparing a nuclear triggered EMP false flag to be blamed on Russia.

Fact Check: The globals are preparing a nuclear triggered EMP false flag to be blamed on Russia.

Published August 12, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Fact-Check: "The globals are preparing a nuclear triggered EMP false flag to be blamed on Russia." ## What We Know The claim that "the globals are...

Fact-Check: "The globals are preparing a nuclear triggered EMP false flag to be blamed on Russia."

What We Know

The claim that "the globals are preparing a nuclear triggered EMP false flag to be blamed on Russia" suggests a coordinated effort to stage a nuclear event that would implicate Russia. However, this assertion lacks credible evidence and is rooted in conspiracy theories rather than verified facts.

  1. The concept of false flag operations has historical precedence, notably the 1983 Soviet nuclear false alarm incident, where a malfunction in the Soviet early warning system led to a false alarm of a U.S. missile launch. This incident highlights the dangers of misinterpretation and the potential for catastrophic outcomes in tense geopolitical climates, but it does not support the claim of a planned false flag operation.

  2. There have been discussions regarding the possibility of false flag chemical or radiological attacks by Russia, particularly in the context of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Reports indicate that Russian state-affiliated media has set the stage for such claims since December 2021, but these do not specifically mention a nuclear EMP event (Understanding War).

  3. Concerns about nuclear attacks and their implications have been discussed widely, especially regarding the potential for staged events to provoke conflict (Daily Telegraph). However, these discussions are speculative and do not provide concrete evidence of a planned false flag operation involving an EMP.

  4. The notion of an EMP attack as a strategic military tactic has been explored, with experts noting that both Russia and China possess capabilities to disrupt U.S. infrastructure through nonkinetic means (USNI Proceedings). Nonetheless, this does not imply any current plans for a false flag operation.

Analysis

The claim in question appears to be a conspiracy theory that conflates various elements of historical events and current geopolitical tensions without providing substantiated evidence.

  • Historical Context: The reference to the 1983 incident serves to illustrate the potential for misunderstandings in nuclear strategy, but it does not indicate a modern parallel where a false flag operation is being orchestrated. The historical context shows the risks involved in nuclear deterrence strategies, but it does not validate the claim of a deliberate false flag operation.

  • Source Reliability: The sources discussing the potential for false flag operations, such as the Understanding War report and the Daily Telegraph, provide context but lack specific evidence linking these discussions to an imminent EMP event. Furthermore, many of the claims circulating on social media regarding false flags are often speculative and lack rigorous verification.

  • Critical Assessment: The sources that do discuss the potential for false flag operations often do so in a speculative context, without concrete evidence. For instance, while the Atlantic Council discusses allegations of false flag operations, it does not provide evidence that these are being planned or executed. This lack of substantiation undermines the credibility of the claim.

Conclusion

The claim that "the globals are preparing a nuclear triggered EMP false flag to be blamed on Russia" is False. It is based on speculative interpretations of geopolitical tensions and historical incidents without credible evidence to support the assertion. The discussions surrounding false flag operations are often rooted in conspiracy theories and do not reflect a verified or imminent threat.

Sources

  1. 1983 Soviet nuclear false alarm incident
  2. Russia May Conduct a Chemical or Radiological False-Flag Attack
  3. Fears of staged "false flag" nuclear attack to trigger global war
  4. An EMP or Solar Incident Could Result in Blackout Warfare
  5. The close calls: how false alarms triggered fears of nuclear war
  6. False Alarms on the Nuclear Front
  7. RUSSIA PREPARES FALSE FLAG ATTACK, DEPLOYS ...
  8. Russian War Report: Russian conspiracy alleges false flag

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Poland is preparing for war against Russia due to perceived invasion threats.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Poland is preparing for war against Russia due to perceived invasion threats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Poland is preparing for war against Russia due to perceived invasion threats.

Jul 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Estonian intelligence warns of Russia preparing for new military conflict.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Estonian intelligence warns of Russia preparing for new military conflict.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Estonian intelligence warns of Russia preparing for new military conflict.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Iran's parliament is preparing to exit the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
True

Fact Check: Iran's parliament is preparing to exit the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Iran's parliament is preparing to exit the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

Jun 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Russia is preparing for a large-scale conflict with NATO by 2030.
Partially True

Fact Check: Russia is preparing for a large-scale conflict with NATO by 2030.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Russia is preparing for a large-scale conflict with NATO by 2030.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Russia is preparing for large-scale conflict with NATO by 2030.
True

Fact Check: Russia is preparing for large-scale conflict with NATO by 2030.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Russia is preparing for large-scale conflict with NATO by 2030.

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →