Fact Check: The globalist control the USA and the world

The Claim: "The globalists control the USA and the world"

Introduction

The assertion that "globalists control the USA and the world" suggests a coordinated effort by a group of elites to manipulate political and economic systems on a global scale. This claim often appears in discussions surrounding globalization, international organizations, and conspiracy theories. It raises questions about the influence of entities like the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the implications of globalization on national sovereignty and job markets.

What We Know

1. Globalization's Impact on Jobs: According to a Washington Post article, globalization has led to significant job losses in the United States, with over 5 million jobs lost in more than 90,000 factories over the past three decades. North Carolina, for example, reportedly lost 300,000 manufacturing jobs following the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) 1.

2. World Economic Forum (WEF): The WEF is often cited in discussions about globalism. A Reuters fact-check clarified that WEF leader Klaus Schwab did not call for "full governmental control" over nations, countering claims that he pressured government leaders to align with the WEF or risk losing power 2.

3. Conspiracy Theories: The term "New World Order" (NWO) is frequently associated with conspiracy theories alleging that a secretive elite is orchestrating a totalitarian world government. This theory has evolved over time, shifting its focus from communists to "globalists" as the perceived threat 379.

4. Far-Right Perspectives: The New York Times has reported that the far-right often uses the term "globalism" to encapsulate a worldview that includes elements of racism and xenophobia. This framing suggests that the narrative around globalism is not just about economic policies but is also intertwined with cultural and racial tensions 4.

5. Anti-Globalization Movement: The anti-globalization movement critiques the capitalist system and its impact on global inequality. Influential figures like Noam Chomsky have been critical of U.S. foreign policy, which they argue exacerbates global disparities 6.

Analysis

The claim that "globalists control the USA and the world" is multifaceted and requires careful scrutiny of its sources and implications.

• Source Reliability: The Washington Post and Reuters are established news organizations known for their journalistic standards, making their reports relatively reliable 12. However, the New York Times, while also credible, has been criticized for potential bias in its coverage of political issues, particularly those involving the far-right 4. Wikipedia entries, while useful for general information, can vary in reliability due to their open-editing nature and should be approached with caution 689.

• Methodological Concerns: The evidence provided by sources discussing job losses due to globalization lacks a direct causal link to the notion of "globalist control." While job losses are documented, attributing these losses to a coordinated effort by global elites requires more robust evidence. The claims surrounding the WEF and Schwab's statements also highlight the necessity of context; misinterpretations can easily arise, as seen in the Reuters fact-check 2.

• Potential Conflicts of Interest: Some sources discussing globalism may have inherent biases, particularly those aligned with political ideologies that oppose globalization. This could skew the interpretation of facts and lead to the promotion of conspiracy theories without sufficient evidence.

• Contradicting Perspectives: While some argue that globalization has led to job losses and diminished national sovereignty, others contend that it has also resulted in economic growth and increased global cooperation. The anti-globalization movement presents a counter-narrative that critiques the capitalist underpinnings of globalization rather than attributing control to a specific elite 6.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that "globalists control the USA and the world" is not substantiated by credible evidence. Key sources, including fact-checks from reputable organizations like Reuters, indicate that assertions of a coordinated elite manipulating global systems are largely unfounded. The evidence presented regarding job losses due to globalization does not directly support the notion of "globalist control," as these economic changes can be attributed to a variety of factors, including technological advancements and policy decisions rather than a singular elite agenda.

It is important to recognize that while globalization has complex effects on national economies and job markets, attributing these changes to a shadowy group of "globalists" oversimplifies the issue and aligns more closely with conspiracy theories than with factual analysis. Furthermore, the framing of globalism often intersects with cultural and political narratives that can distort the discussion.

However, it is essential to acknowledge the limitations of the available evidence. The discourse surrounding globalization is nuanced, and while the claim has been debunked, the broader implications of globalization and its impact on society warrant ongoing critical examination. Readers are encouraged to approach such claims with skepticism and to evaluate information critically, considering multiple perspectives and the reliability of sources.

Sources

1. Unpacking the White House spin on the impact of ‘globalist’ policies - The Washington Post. Link
2. Fact Check: WEF leader did not ask for 'full governmental control' over ... - Reuters. Link
3. The New World Order: The Historical Origins of a ... - Middlebury Institute. Link
4. Globalism: A Far-Right Conspiracy Theory Buoyed by Trump - The New York Times. Link
5. Fact check: The World Economic Forum does not have a ... - Reuters. Link
6. Anti-globalization movement - Wikipedia. Link
7. New World Order conspiracy theory - Wikipedia. Link
8. Globalism - Wikipedia. Link
9. New World Order conspiracy theory - Wikipedia. Link
10. The WEF’s chairman did not confess that a ‘political revolution’ is destroying his agenda | AP News. Link