Fact Check: The girl's attorney Roman Martinez called the ruling a win for children with disabilities facing discrimination in schools across the country.

Fact Check: The girl's attorney Roman Martinez called the ruling a win for children with disabilities facing discrimination in schools across the country.

Published June 13, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The girl's attorney Roman Martinez called the ruling a win for children with disabilities facing discrimination in schools across the c...

Fact Check: "The girl's attorney Roman Martinez called the ruling a win for children with disabilities facing discrimination in schools across the country."

What We Know

On June 12, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling that is expected to significantly ease the process for families of children with disabilities to sue school districts for discrimination. This ruling stemmed from a case involving a teenage girl with a rare form of epilepsy, whose family argued that her school district failed to provide necessary accommodations for her disability. The lower courts had previously ruled against the family, requiring them to prove that the school acted with "bad faith or gross misjudgment," a standard that is more stringent than that typically applied in disability discrimination cases (source-1, source-3).

The Supreme Court's decision clarified that lawsuits against schools regarding disability accommodations should adhere to the same legal standards as other discrimination claims. Chief Justice John Roberts noted that children with disabilities "face daunting challenges on a daily basis" and should not be subjected to a higher standard of proof (source-2, source-4).

Roman Martinez, the attorney representing the girl, stated that the ruling is a victory not only for his client but also for "children with disabilities facing discrimination in schools across the country" (source-3, source-7).

Analysis

The claim that Roman Martinez characterized the Supreme Court ruling as a win for children with disabilities is supported by multiple reputable sources. The unanimous decision of the Supreme Court is a landmark ruling that aligns with the broader goals of disability rights advocates, as it lowers the burden of proof for families seeking justice against school districts that fail to provide adequate accommodations.

The sources cited are credible, including major news outlets like the Associated Press and CBS News, which reported on the ruling and included direct quotes from Martinez. The ruling is also celebrated by organizations advocating for the rights of students with disabilities, such as COPAA (Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates), which highlights the significance of this decision in protecting the rights of disabled students (source-5, source-6).

The analysis of the ruling indicates a shift towards greater protections for disabled students, which is a crucial step in ensuring equitable access to education. Martinez's statement reflects this shift and emphasizes the ruling's broader implications for children with disabilities nationwide.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that Roman Martinez called the Supreme Court ruling a win for children with disabilities facing discrimination in schools is accurate. His statement is corroborated by multiple credible sources that report on the ruling's significance and its implications for disability rights in education.

Sources

  1. US Supreme Court bolsters school disability protections
  2. Supreme Court decision makes it easier for disabled students to sue school districts for bias
  3. Minnesota girl with epilepsy wins Supreme Court ruling
  4. US Supreme Court Bolsters School Disability Protections
  5. COPAA Celebrates Landmark Win for Students with Disabilities
  6. Supreme Court Unanimously Sides With Disabled Student
  7. Supreme Court win for girl with epilepsy expected to make disability lawsuits against schools easier
  8. Supreme Court Decision Lets Students Sue Schools More Easily for Disability Bias

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check:  DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Attorney General Pamela Bondi <redacted_social_handle> X California officials are failing to protect girls on the playing field and in the locker room. The Department of Justice has filed suit
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Attorney General Pamela Bondi <redacted_social_handle> X California officials are failing to protect girls on the playing field and in the locker room. The Department of Justice has filed suit

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Attorney General Pamela Bondi <redacted_social_handle> X California officials are failing to protect girls on the playing field and in the locker room. The Department of Justice has filed suit

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: An undocumented man tried to kill U.S. Attorney John A. Sarcone III.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: An undocumented man tried to kill U.S. Attorney John A. Sarcone III.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: An undocumented man tried to kill U.S. Attorney John A. Sarcone III.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Attorney General Pam Bondi admitted no client list for Jeffrey Epstein exists.
True

Fact Check: Attorney General Pam Bondi admitted no client list for Jeffrey Epstein exists.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Attorney General Pam Bondi admitted no client list for Jeffrey Epstein exists.

Jul 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Florida State Attorney General provides legal opinions on state laws.
True

Fact Check: The Florida State Attorney General provides legal opinions on state laws.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Florida State Attorney General provides legal opinions on state laws.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Immigration judges work under the direction of the U.S. attorney general.
True

Fact Check: Immigration judges work under the direction of the U.S. attorney general.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Immigration judges work under the direction of the U.S. attorney general.

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →