Fact Check: The fight against Trump's citizenship order continues in district courts.

Fact Check: The Fight Against Trump's Citizenship Order Continues in District Courts

What We Know

The claim that "the fight against Trump's citizenship order continues in district courts" is supported by recent legal developments surrounding Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship. On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a case related to this executive order, which aimed to limit birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents. The plaintiffs in this case argued that the executive order violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause and relevant sections of the Nationality Act (source-1).

The ruling from the Supreme Court indicated that three federal district court judges had found the executive order likely violates citizenship language in the U.S. Constitution, and the litigation involved immigrant rights groups and 22 states who had filed lawsuits against the order (source-2, source-3). This indicates that the legal battles surrounding the executive order are ongoing, as lower courts continue to address the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling.

Analysis

The evidence supports the claim that litigation regarding Trump's citizenship order is still active in district courts. The Supreme Court's decision to limit nationwide injunctions means that while some aspects of the executive order may be enforced, challenges to its legality remain (source-4, source-8).

The ongoing litigation involves various stakeholders, including state governments and immigrant rights organizations, which indicates a robust opposition to the executive order. The Supreme Court's ruling does not resolve the matter entirely; instead, it opens the door for further legal challenges at the district court level, where plaintiffs may continue to argue against the order's enforcement (source-6).

The sources used in this analysis are credible, including major news outlets and legal documents, which provide a comprehensive view of the current legal landscape regarding Trump's citizenship order. The Supreme Court's rulings and the responses from various legal entities lend weight to the assertion that the fight against the citizenship order is far from over.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that "the fight against Trump's citizenship order continues in district courts" is accurate. The recent Supreme Court ruling has not concluded the legal battles surrounding the executive order, and ongoing litigation indicates that challenges will persist as various parties seek to contest its enforcement.

Fact Check: The fight against Trump's citizenship order continues in district courts.