Fact Check: The federal government filed an appeal against a federal judge's ruling that deemed Trump's deployment of National Guard troops illegal.

Fact Check: "The federal government filed an appeal against a federal judge's ruling that deemed Trump's deployment of National Guard troops illegal."

What We Know

In June 2025, a federal judge, Charles Breyer, ruled that President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles was illegal, stating that he exceeded his statutory authority and violated the Tenth Amendment, which delineates the powers of federal and state governments (source-1, source-3). The judge ordered that control of the California National Guard troops be returned to the state governor, Gavin Newsom. However, the ruling was stayed to allow the Trump administration time to appeal (source-2).

The Trump administration quickly filed an appeal against this ruling, arguing that the deployment was necessary to maintain order amid protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles (source-4). The appeal was granted by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which temporarily blocked the judge's order, allowing the deployment to continue while the case is reviewed (source-6).

Analysis

The claim that the federal government filed an appeal against a federal judge's ruling regarding the legality of Trump's deployment of National Guard troops is accurate. The timeline of events confirms that Judge Breyer ruled the deployment illegal and mandated the return of control to the governor. The Trump administration's immediate response was to file an appeal, which was subsequently accepted by the appeals court (source-5).

The sources used in this analysis are credible and come from well-established news organizations, including the BBC, AP News, and NPR, which are known for their journalistic integrity. Each source provides consistent details about the court's ruling and the administration's response, reinforcing the claim's validity. The legal arguments presented by both the judge and the Trump administration highlight the contentious nature of the deployment and the legal framework surrounding the National Guard's use, particularly the balance of power between state and federal authorities (source-7).

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that the federal government filed an appeal against a federal judge's ruling that deemed Trump's deployment of National Guard troops illegal is true. The evidence clearly shows that following the judge's ruling, the Trump administration acted promptly to appeal the decision, and the appeals court subsequently allowed the deployment to continue while the case was under review.

Sources

1. Appeals court temporarily allows Trump to keep National Guard in LA
2. Appeals court temporarily blocks judge’s ruling to return control of National Guard to California
3. Trump can keep California National Guard deployed for now
4. Appeals court allows Trump to keep National Guard in L.A.
5. Trump's Use of National Guard in Limbo After Court Rulings
6. Appeals court blocks earlier ruling, allows Trump to keep control of California National Guard
7. Judge rules Trump illegally used California's National Guard in Los Angeles