Fact Check: The Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland dismissed appeals against account freezes in 2024, confirming that the requirements for blocking were met.

Fact Check: The Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland dismissed appeals against account freezes in 2024, confirming that the requirements for blocking were met.

June 14, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland dismissed appeals against account freezes in 2024, confirming that the requirements for...

Fact Check: "The Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland dismissed appeals against account freezes in 2024, confirming that the requirements for blocking were met."

What We Know

In 2024, the Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland dismissed multiple appeals regarding the freezing of bank accounts linked to individuals associated with former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych. These account freezes were originally ordered by the Federal Council in response to concerns about illicitly acquired assets belonging to politically exposed persons from Ukraine. The court confirmed that the legal requirements for these account freezes were indeed met, particularly noting that the Ukrainian authorities were unable to fulfill the necessary conditions for mutual legal assistance in criminal matters (Swiss court rejects appeal to release funds linked to former ..., Federal Supreme Court: Account freezes on Ukraine ...).

Analysis

The dismissal of the appeals by the Federal Administrative Court is significant as it reinforces the Swiss government's stance on maintaining sanctions against individuals tied to the Yanukovych regime. The court's decisions were based on the Federal Act on the Freezing and Restitution of Illicit Assets of Foreign Politically Exposed Persons (FIAA), which provides a legal framework for such actions. This law allows for the freezing of assets pending a decision on their confiscation, thereby preventing any withdrawal of funds until the legal proceedings are resolved (Swiss Court Rejects Appeal To Release Funds Linked To ...).

The reliability of the sources reporting on this matter is high, as they include established news organizations and legal commentary platforms that specialize in Swiss law and international relations. The information is corroborated across multiple outlets, indicating a consensus on the court's ruling and the underlying legal principles (Federal Supreme Court: Account freezes on Ukraine ..., Swiss court rejects appeal to release funds linked to former ...).

Conclusion

The claim that "The Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland dismissed appeals against account freezes in 2024, confirming that the requirements for blocking were met" is True. The evidence from multiple credible sources confirms that the court upheld the account freezes, citing compliance with legal requirements and the inability of Ukrainian authorities to meet the necessary conditions for mutual legal assistance.

Sources

  1. Swiss court rejects appeal to release funds linked to former ...
  2. Federal Supreme Court: Account freezes on Ukraine ...
  3. Swiss Court Rejects Appeal To Release Funds Linked To ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: On June 14, 2025, a federal judge ordered President Trump to end his unilateral deployment of the National Guard in California, but an appeals court temporarily preserved his ability to do so.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: On June 14, 2025, a federal judge ordered President Trump to end his unilateral deployment of the National Guard in California, but an appeals court temporarily preserved his ability to do so.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On June 14, 2025, a federal judge ordered President Trump to end his unilateral deployment of the National Guard in California, but an appeals court temporarily preserved his ability to do so.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A federal judge ruled that Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles was unlawful, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked this ruling two hours later.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A federal judge ruled that Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles was unlawful, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked this ruling two hours later.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A federal judge ruled that Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles was unlawful, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked this ruling two hours later.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Federal Council of Switzerland ordered the blocking of assets linked to politically exposed persons in 2022 and 2023.
True

Fact Check: The Federal Council of Switzerland ordered the blocking of assets linked to politically exposed persons in 2022 and 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Federal Council of Switzerland ordered the blocking of assets linked to politically exposed persons in 2022 and 2023.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.
Needs Research

Fact Check: The Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Federal Supreme Court indicated that Ukrainian authorities are not in a position to fulfill the requirements for mutual legal assistance proceedings in criminal matters.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The five former Memphis officers involved in Tyre Nichols' death were indicted in federal court in September 2023.
True

Fact Check: The five former Memphis officers involved in Tyre Nichols' death were indicted in federal court in September 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The five former Memphis officers involved in Tyre Nichols' death were indicted in federal court in September 2023.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →