Fact Check: The DREAMS program, which aimed to reduce HIV risk among young women in Kenya, had virtually all participants remain HIV-free during their three-year enrollment.

Fact Check: The DREAMS program, which aimed to reduce HIV risk among young women in Kenya, had virtually all participants remain HIV-free during their three-year enrollment.

Published June 14, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "The DREAMS program, which aimed to reduce HIV risk among young women in Kenya, had virtually all participants remain HIV-free during th...

Fact Check: "The DREAMS program, which aimed to reduce HIV risk among young women in Kenya, had virtually all participants remain HIV-free during their three-year enrollment."

What We Know

The DREAMS (Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored, and Safe) Partnership was initiated to reduce HIV incidence among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa. The program aimed for a 40% reduction in HIV incidence over two years through a combination of interventions addressing various risk factors (source-1).

Research conducted in Kenya and South Africa indicates that while there were declines in HIV incidence among AGYW during the period of DREAMS implementation, these declines began before the program's introduction and did not accelerate during the first three years of the program (source-1). Specifically, the study found that HIV incidence rates among AGYW aged 15-24 did not show evidence of a significant reduction attributable to DREAMS during the initial three years (source-1).

In Kenya, the pre-DREAMS HIV incidence rate was approximately 0.7%, which is significantly lower than the rates observed in South Africa, where the pre-DREAMS incidence was around 6% (source-1). This context is crucial, as it suggests that while the program may have had some positive impacts, the assertion that "virtually all participants remained HIV-free" is misleading.

Analysis

The claim that "virtually all participants remained HIV-free" during their enrollment in the DREAMS program lacks empirical support. The studies evaluating the program's impact indicate that while there were reductions in HIV incidence, these reductions were not solely attributable to DREAMS and were part of a broader trend that began prior to the program's implementation (source-1).

The evidence suggests that the declines in HIV incidence among AGYW occurred alongside other interventions, such as increased access to HIV testing and treatment, which were already in place before DREAMS began (source-1). Furthermore, the study in Gem, Kenya, showed that while there were lower HIV incidence estimates during DREAMS implementation, the changes were not statistically significant, indicating that the program did not have the expected immediate effect on HIV incidence rates (source-1).

The reliability of the sources used in this analysis is high, as they are peer-reviewed studies published in reputable journals. However, it is important to note that the interpretation of the data can vary, and some reports may emphasize different aspects of the findings. Nonetheless, the overall consensus from the available research indicates that the claim is overstated.

Conclusion

Verdict: False
The claim that "virtually all participants remained HIV-free" during their enrollment in the DREAMS program is misleading. While the program aimed to reduce HIV incidence among young women in Kenya, the evidence shows that significant declines in HIV incidence began before the program's implementation and did not accelerate during the first three years of DREAMS. Therefore, the assertion that all participants remained HIV-free is not supported by the data.

Sources

  1. Evaluating the impact of DREAMS on HIV incidence among adolescent girls and young women: A population-based cohort study in Kenya and South Africa. Link
  2. Impact of the DREAMS Partnership on social support and general self-efficacy among adolescent girls and young women: causal analysis of population-based cohorts in Kenya and South Africa. Link
  3. Evaluating the impact of DREAMS on HIV incidence among adolescent girls and young women. Link
  4. DREAMS Fact Sheet KENYA - U.S. Department of State. Link
  5. DREAMS program - Safe Futures Hub. Link
  6. The effects of the Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored and Safe (DREAMS) Partnership on HIV incidence. Link
  7. Program effects of DREAMS among adolescent girls and young women in Kenya. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Take a Step Back, Canada. Think. In the middle of a chaotic political season, with an election looming, we’re being told, once again, what to think. Suddenly, Trump’s proposed tariffs are being framed as the existential crisis for Canadians. This is not just political distraction, it is outright manipulation. A deflection. A convenient scapegoat. Let’s be clear, these tariffs haven’t even come into effect yet, and still, we’re told they’re the reason for our economic pain. But Canadians know better. We’ve been living the consequences of nearly a decade of Liberal leadership, long before tariffs were ever on the table. Our dreams have been quietly dismantled. • Housing is out of reach for an entire generation • Grocery bills have doubled in just a few years • Families are struggling just to stay afloat • Crime is surging, and our streets are riddled with addiction and despair • Young Canadians can’t afford homes, can’t start families, can’t build futures This isn’t Trump’s fault. This isn’t about foreign policy. This is about failed leadership at home. We are not suffering because of decisions made in Washington, we are suffering because of decisions made in Ottawa. The media wants to turn your attention elsewhere. They want to manufacture outrage, shift blame, and paint you as ignorant if you dare question the narrative. But you are not ignorant. You are a Canadian who wants a better future, for yourself, for your children, for this country. Don’t let them distract you. The real threat to our prosperity isn’t coming from the south, it is coming from within. And if we don’t wake up now, we risk losing the very freedoms and opportunities that once defined this nation. This election is not about Trump. It’s about Canada. It’s about your children’s future. It’s about reclaiming a country where hard work pays off, where dreams are possible, where hope lives again. Don’t be brainwashed. Don’t be distracted. Think critically. Vote with your eyes open. Vote Conservative

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Take a Step Back, Canada. Think. In the middle of a chaotic political season, with an election looming, we’re being told, once again, what to think. Suddenly, Trump’s proposed tariffs are being framed as the existential crisis for Canadians. This is not just political distraction, it is outright manipulation. A deflection. A convenient scapegoat. Let’s be clear, these tariffs haven’t even come into effect yet, and still, we’re told they’re the reason for our economic pain. But Canadians know better. We’ve been living the consequences of nearly a decade of Liberal leadership, long before tariffs were ever on the table. Our dreams have been quietly dismantled. • Housing is out of reach for an entire generation • Grocery bills have doubled in just a few years • Families are struggling just to stay afloat • Crime is surging, and our streets are riddled with addiction and despair • Young Canadians can’t afford homes, can’t start families, can’t build futures This isn’t Trump’s fault. This isn’t about foreign policy. This is about failed leadership at home. We are not suffering because of decisions made in Washington, we are suffering because of decisions made in Ottawa. The media wants to turn your attention elsewhere. They want to manufacture outrage, shift blame, and paint you as ignorant if you dare question the narrative. But you are not ignorant. You are a Canadian who wants a better future, for yourself, for your children, for this country. Don’t let them distract you. The real threat to our prosperity isn’t coming from the south, it is coming from within. And if we don’t wake up now, we risk losing the very freedoms and opportunities that once defined this nation. This election is not about Trump. It’s about Canada. It’s about your children’s future. It’s about reclaiming a country where hard work pays off, where dreams are possible, where hope lives again. Don’t be brainwashed. Don’t be distracted. Think critically. Vote with your eyes open. Vote Conservative

Mar 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Invent2Prevent program, aimed at combating violence, is now defunct.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Invent2Prevent program, aimed at combating violence, is now defunct.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Invent2Prevent program, aimed at combating violence, is now defunct.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Invent2Prevent program, aimed at combating violence, is officially terminated.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Invent2Prevent program, aimed at combating violence, is officially terminated.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Invent2Prevent program, aimed at combating violence, is officially terminated.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump administration kills anti-terrorism program, risking public safety.
False

Fact Check: Trump administration kills anti-terrorism program, risking public safety.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump administration kills anti-terrorism program, risking public safety.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  As of June 1st 2025, a State Regulated Burial Protection Program, up to 35,000, has been approved in your state that is available to Every Senior regardless of most pre-existing conditions.

If you were born prior to 1975, we can help you qualify for this AFFORDABLE, State Regulated Burial Protection Program that is designed to cover the ENTIRE amount of end of life costs up to 35,000.
Unverified

Fact Check: As of June 1st 2025, a State Regulated Burial Protection Program, up to 35,000, has been approved in your state that is available to Every Senior regardless of most pre-existing conditions. If you were born prior to 1975, we can help you qualify for this AFFORDABLE, State Regulated Burial Protection Program that is designed to cover the ENTIRE amount of end of life costs up to 35,000.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: As of June 1st 2025, a State Regulated Burial Protection Program, up to 35,000, has been approved in your state that is available to Every Senior regardless of most pre-existing conditions. If you were born prior to 1975, we can help you qualify for this AFFORDABLE, State Regulated Burial Protection Program that is designed to cover the ENTIRE amount of end of life costs up to 35,000.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The DREAMS program, which aimed to reduce HIV risk among young women in Kenya, had virtually all participants remain HIV-free during their three-year enrollment. | TruthOrFake Blog