Fact Check: The damage caused by the Jan. 6 attack is estimated by Congress’ audit arm to be $2.7 billion.

Fact Check: The damage caused by the Jan. 6 attack is estimated by Congress’ audit arm to be $2.7 billion.

Published June 14, 2025
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "The damage caused by the Jan. 6 attack is estimated by Congress’ audit arm to be $2.7 billion." ## What We Know The claim that the dam...

Fact Check: "The damage caused by the Jan. 6 attack is estimated by Congress’ audit arm to be $2.7 billion."

What We Know

The claim that the damage caused by the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol is estimated to be $2.7 billion has been referenced in various reports and articles. According to a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the estimated costs associated with the attack, which include property damage and other expenses, indeed amount to approximately $2.7 billion. This figure has been cited in multiple sources, including a news article that discusses the financial implications of the attack and a report from the House Oversight Committee that confirms the GAO's findings.

The $2.7 billion figure encompasses a wide range of costs, including physical damage to the Capitol building, security expenses, and other related costs incurred by federal and local agencies in response to the attack. The GAO report specifically notes that these costs are part of a broader assessment of the events surrounding January 6, 2021.

Analysis

While the $2.7 billion estimate is widely reported, it is essential to evaluate the reliability of the sources providing this information. The primary source, the GAO report, is a credible government agency known for its thorough investigations and audits. The GAO's findings are based on comprehensive data collection and analysis, making it a reliable source of information regarding government expenditures.

However, some reports, such as those from Forbes and CBS News, have noted that the estimate could be conservative, suggesting that the actual costs may be higher. This indicates a level of uncertainty in the exact figure, which is common in assessments of this nature due to the complexities involved in calculating total damages.

Moreover, the context in which the $2.7 billion figure is presented can vary. For instance, while it is often cited as a total cost, some reports emphasize that only a small fraction of this amount is expected to be repaid by those responsible for the damages, which raises questions about accountability and financial recovery.

In summary, while the $2.7 billion estimate is supported by credible sources, the nuances surrounding the calculation and potential underestimation of costs warrant further investigation. The varying interpretations of the data and the implications of the costs suggest that more research is needed to fully understand the financial impact of the January 6 attack.

Conclusion

Needs Research. The claim that the damage caused by the January 6 attack is estimated to be $2.7 billion is substantiated by credible sources, particularly the GAO report. However, the complexities of the situation, including potential underestimations and the broader implications of the costs, indicate that further research is necessary to provide a comprehensive understanding of the financial ramifications of the attack.

Sources

  1. March 24, 2025 Mr. Thomas E. Austin Architect of the ...
  2. Capitol Attack: Federal Agencies Identified Some Threats, ...
  3. The Committee on House Administration's January 6 ...
  4. Cost of January 6 Capitol riot? $2.7 billion, according to GAO
  5. Proud Boys' lawsuit against DOJ is legally unsound
  6. Capitol Riot Costs Go Up: Government Estimates $2.73 ...
  7. Congressional Democrats investigate unpaid January 6 ...
  8. Federal officials have doubled the estimated damages from ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Gender ideology has undermined freedom of speech, scientific truth, gay rights, and women's and girls' safety, privacy and dignity. It's also caused irreparable physical damage to vulnerable kids.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Gender ideology has undermined freedom of speech, scientific truth, gay rights, and women's and girls' safety, privacy and dignity. It's also caused irreparable physical damage to vulnerable kids.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Gender ideology has undermined freedom of speech, scientific truth, gay rights, and women's and girls' safety, privacy and dignity. It's also caused irreparable physical damage to vulnerable kids.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Juicing can damage kidneys
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Juicing can damage kidneys

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Juicing can damage kidneys

Aug 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: “heart damage resulting from the mRNA and Spike protei
Partially True

Fact Check: “heart damage resulting from the mRNA and Spike protei

Detailed fact-check analysis of: “heart damage resulting from the mRNA and Spike protei

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: On July 10, ICE agents raided two marijuana farms in Carpinteria and Camarillo in the sanctuary state of California. Agents found at least 14 migrant children at the sites, believed to have been labor trafficked, and more than 360 illegal aliens — including those convicted of rape, child molestation, and kidnapping, among other crimes.

Among the hundreds of illegal aliens arrested in the raid were:

Santos Alberto Rodriguez-Jacinto of El Salvador, arrested in El Salvador in 2006 and 2011 for terroristic threats
Josefina Lopez-Martinez of Mexico, previously deported in 1998 and convicted in 2023 of willful cruelty to a child in California
Jorge Luis Anaya-Garcia of Mexico, previously arrested in California for possession with intent to sell narcotics
Jose Vasquez-Lopez of Mexico, previously deported five times from the U.S. and convicted of battery in Florida
Fabian Fernando Antonio-Martinez of Mexico, twice granted voluntary return and was arrested in February 2021 in California for felony possession of a firearm
Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez of Mexico, previously arrested for indecent exposure and granted voluntary return three times
Miguel Mejia-Echevearia of El Salvador, arrested for hit-and-run with property damage
Christina Martinez-Modesto of Mexico, arrested for misdemeanor assault and battery of her spouse
Cinthia Paola Cardona-Mendoza of Mexico, arrested for assault with a deadly weapon
Adriana Gonzalez-Gonzalez of Mexico, convicted three times for burglary and drunk driving
Partially True

Fact Check: On July 10, ICE agents raided two marijuana farms in Carpinteria and Camarillo in the sanctuary state of California. Agents found at least 14 migrant children at the sites, believed to have been labor trafficked, and more than 360 illegal aliens — including those convicted of rape, child molestation, and kidnapping, among other crimes. Among the hundreds of illegal aliens arrested in the raid were: Santos Alberto Rodriguez-Jacinto of El Salvador, arrested in El Salvador in 2006 and 2011 for terroristic threats Josefina Lopez-Martinez of Mexico, previously deported in 1998 and convicted in 2023 of willful cruelty to a child in California Jorge Luis Anaya-Garcia of Mexico, previously arrested in California for possession with intent to sell narcotics Jose Vasquez-Lopez of Mexico, previously deported five times from the U.S. and convicted of battery in Florida Fabian Fernando Antonio-Martinez of Mexico, twice granted voluntary return and was arrested in February 2021 in California for felony possession of a firearm Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez of Mexico, previously arrested for indecent exposure and granted voluntary return three times Miguel Mejia-Echevearia of El Salvador, arrested for hit-and-run with property damage Christina Martinez-Modesto of Mexico, arrested for misdemeanor assault and battery of her spouse Cinthia Paola Cardona-Mendoza of Mexico, arrested for assault with a deadly weapon Adriana Gonzalez-Gonzalez of Mexico, convicted three times for burglary and drunk driving

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On July 10, ICE agents raided two marijuana farms in Carpinteria and Camarillo in the sanctuary state of California. Agents found at least 14 migrant children at the sites, believed to have been labor trafficked, and more than 360 illegal aliens — including those convicted of rape, child molestation, and kidnapping, among other crimes. Among the hundreds of illegal aliens arrested in the raid were: Santos Alberto Rodriguez-Jacinto of El Salvador, arrested in El Salvador in 2006 and 2011 for terroristic threats Josefina Lopez-Martinez of Mexico, previously deported in 1998 and convicted in 2023 of willful cruelty to a child in California Jorge Luis Anaya-Garcia of Mexico, previously arrested in California for possession with intent to sell narcotics Jose Vasquez-Lopez of Mexico, previously deported five times from the U.S. and convicted of battery in Florida Fabian Fernando Antonio-Martinez of Mexico, twice granted voluntary return and was arrested in February 2021 in California for felony possession of a firearm Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez of Mexico, previously arrested for indecent exposure and granted voluntary return three times Miguel Mejia-Echevearia of El Salvador, arrested for hit-and-run with property damage Christina Martinez-Modesto of Mexico, arrested for misdemeanor assault and battery of her spouse Cinthia Paola Cardona-Mendoza of Mexico, arrested for assault with a deadly weapon Adriana Gonzalez-Gonzalez of Mexico, convicted three times for burglary and drunk driving

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: George Soros has done more damage to Israel's standing than anyone else.
Partially True

Fact Check: George Soros has done more damage to Israel's standing than anyone else.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: George Soros has done more damage to Israel's standing than anyone else.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The damage caused by the Jan. 6 attack is estimated by Congress’ audit arm to be $2.7 billion. | TruthOrFake Blog