Fact Check: The consolidated case reverted to its original name, L.W. v. Skrmetti, after the Trump administration dropped the previous administration’s support for the plaintiffs.

Fact Check: "The consolidated case reverted to its original name, L.W. v. Skrmetti, after the Trump administration dropped the previous administration’s support for the plaintiffs."

What We Know

The claim centers around the legal case known as L.W. v. Skrmetti, which involves challenges to Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors. Following the change in administration from President Biden to President Trump, the Department of Justice withdrew its support for the plaintiffs in this case. This withdrawal led to the case reverting to its original name, L.W. v. Skrmetti. According to a report by the New York Times, the Trump administration's decision to change the government's position significantly impacted the case, aligning it with the interests of the state of Tennessee rather than the plaintiffs.

Analysis

The sources supporting this claim are credible and provide a clear narrative of the events. The U.S. Department of Justice document confirms that the case was initially supported by the previous administration but that this support was withdrawn under the Trump administration, which led to the reversion of the case name. Additionally, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) outlines the background of the case and the implications of the administration's change in position.

The Associated Press also corroborates this information, stating that the Trump administration's withdrawal of support for the plaintiffs was a pivotal moment in the case's trajectory. Furthermore, a recent report from LGBTQ Nation reiterates that the case reverted to its original name after the Trump administration's actions, providing further validation of the claim.

While the sources are generally reliable, it is important to note that media outlets can have varying degrees of bias. However, the legal documents from the U.S. Department of Justice serve as a primary source and are considered highly authoritative.

Conclusion

The claim that "the consolidated case reverted to its original name, L.W. v. Skrmetti, after the Trump administration dropped the previous administration’s support for the plaintiffs" is True. The evidence from multiple credible sources confirms that the withdrawal of support by the Trump administration directly resulted in the reversion of the case name, aligning with the actions taken by the Department of Justice.

Fact Check: The consolidated case reverted to its original name, L.W. v. Skrmetti, after the Trump administration dropped the previous administration’s support for the plaintiffs.